Does free will exist? Why?

Free will. The argument that it does not exist is mainly based on the certainty of the physical system, not to mention the quantum uncertainty of the physical system, because it is not needed. How can a definite system produce free will?

This needs to be thought from a different perspective. The first is whether different physical systems can produce the same logical system, with a controllable state and a controllable behavior. It's completely doable.

For example, a thousand different computers can run the same program to get the same result, which means that the logical system can exist independently of the physical system. We cannot say that these physical computers cannot change their state and behavior because of their deterministic nature, in fact, it is precisely because of their determinism that the correct operation of the program is guaranteed.

There is basically no free will. Human free will is more like an appearance, a feeling. The concept of freedom itself is illusory, and a bacterium is neither free nor free, depending on how you define it.

Neither mechanistic nor quantum theory can deduce the existence of free will – we cannot say that when the dice are rolled in our brains, free will arises in our own brains. Of course, from a practical point of view, if a person thinks he is free, he is free, and it is not feasible to pursue an absolutely objective solution to this relative concept.

I have the impression that free will works like this: if human beings are only obedient to God's arrangement, then human beings have no free will, and human actions cannot be good or evil. God has given human beings free will in order to achieve greater good in the world, so that people can obtain true good by their own active choices, but at the cost of this people also have the right to choose evil, but this situation is obviously better than a stagnant situation.

Of course, interested children can take a look at how the wiki and sep define free will, but I don't think there is any contradiction here: because those definitions refer to the qualities that some people have, such as the ability to reflect, but these things, to the bottom of the question, still have to be explained within the framework of naturalism. Thus, a quality that is a quality of human consciousness, if we are to call it free will, is clearly present and will not be eliminated, just like consciousness itself:

The fact that human consciousness can be fully explained by microscopic phenomena does not mean that consciousness does not exist. However, in the metaphysical senseTrueHow to define free will is a question.

Free will, it's not an objective thing, a nail or a car, it's a subjective thing in the mind, there's no way to prove it's a matter of perception, they have a way to prove it. I can only say that he exists because our people need him in life and work, so when it comes to free will, it should exist.

From a psychological and biological point of view, there is no such thing as a free-will. Everything you do depends on your reaction and feedback to something. All your actions or thoughts are reactions to one thing or a series of things that you do, so everything is a chain of things that are closely related to each other, rather than being free to play through your free-will.

The naturalistic system itself does not reserve a seat for free will: if the will is to be explained, we must explain it by natural means, i.e., that the causes of consciousness cannot have any reason for falling outside of nature, and that the soul can exist, but the soul independent of the physical world? There is no such thing.

Randomness in quantum mechanics does not guarantee free will, randomness only guarantees random will.

Intelligent systems differ from non-intelligent mechanical systems in that intelligence is a purposeful activity. In order to achieve the goal, the system needs to perceive the changes in the environment, recognize the law of change, so as to predict the future, and then preset the response mechanism of the system to achieve the goal. Therefore, the acquisition and processing of information and knowledge is the core part of intelligent systems.

Non-intelligent systems are not purposeful, so they only exhibit mechanical causality and fate. And it is purposefulness, foresight, and presupposition that make intelligent systems transcend mechanical causal fate and have freedom.

Freedom is the choice of what's possible. Is there a result in the world without a cause? If it is only mechanical cause and effect, then the world is fated and there must be no freedom, and if there is no cause, then action cannot be said to be free, but random.

Man is free by foreseeing the future and choosing a preset mode of reaction, transcending mechanical cause and effect. The more items you can choose from, the more freedom you have.

One choice can bring more choices to the future, which is freedom of choice; It is also possible to make the choice less and less in the future, and in the end there is no choice, which is the choice of destruction. A choice that can bring more freedom to oneself but gives others fewer choices is choosing to be imprisoned and enslaved; And one choice can give all people more choices, and that is freedom of choice.

Without free will, there can be no social progress, and knowledge is based on discovery and exploration. Resting on its laurels and just machinery, humans need the spirit of freedom and exploration.

It doesn't seem to exist. It is currently impossible to prove or falsify. Personally, I believe that this question is equivalent to: whether the soul exists. If consciousness is indeed only a product of the brain, true free will does not exist. Because everything just follows the laws of physics.

I think free will still exists, it just depends on how the individual understands it. Maybe there is no one definite answer to everything, many things are in an intermediate state, and only by keeping the discussion space can human wisdom be born, haha!

Of course, there is, because this is the fundamental consciousness of what it means to be human, the instinctive attribute of life.

Humans are also a logical system similar to computers. Different people are different physical realizations, but they can all become a person, and they can all have their own knowledge, feelings, goals, and wills. Physical certainty does not preclude the existence of a free person.

Free consciousness can be understood as soul consciousness, the soul is the known macrocosm and microcosm appendages, the relationship between the soul and the body is actually correct to say that the body is housed on the soul, the soul is the essence of nothing, it is 0 consciousness, the universe has no beginning and no end, the universe has natural laws, fixed cause and effect, but he can not only control the basis of being, the soul is nothing, but also has an ontology, and the framework of the soul is the framework of the universe.

As long as people are self-aware, they must be self-conscious. Those who are not self-aware can only be scientific yellow-skinned and white-hearted humanoid garbage. Of course, the Western humanoid beasts that have come out of Western cultural science also have a simpler and superficial self-consciousness than humans.

All things are the product of the laws of nature, and there will be no true freedom, unless you are God, but on the territory of the universe, God will not be allowed to exist.

Learn to promote! Know how strong. By the heart, there are short and long.

Free will. Free will is a philosophical proposition, the core of which is whether people can produce consciousness completely freely without being affected by external objects. This determines whether the world is materialistic or idealistic.

Materialists believe that man does not have free will. All human thinking is based on a reaction to material reality. For example, if you suddenly want to eat watermelon now, it's not really you"Free"The idea of staring at a sedan chair is determined by your perception of watermelon, the environment you are in, and the small details you are not aware of.

Idealists believe that man has free will, that matter is only a reflection of man's consciousness, and that man's thoughts are generated first and then reflected in matter. For example, if you suddenly want to eat watermelon now, your free random consciousness is that you want to eat something cold, sweet, and crunchy, and then it is reflected in the material watermelon, and it is reflected in time as the present.

From this point of view, everything about you"Whims"., in fact, it was all subconsciously set for the duel before, not really"Random behavior".So man has no free will.

Don't be confused here, people have an independent will, that is, people make decisions"Autonomy"of, and"Free"are two concepts.

Some scholars believe that if a person really achieves philosophical free will, that is, the generation of consciousness does not follow the causal logic of reality and has randomness, then in reality this person is a madman, and it is the kind that can never be cured.

Man has no real free will. Since the 80s of the last century, the debate between free will and determinism has attracted many researchers, when Benjamin Libet of the United States studied the brain decision-making process and found that conscious decision-making is initiated by the brain's unconscious processes, they recorded a kind of brain wave that can act as a "preparatory potential", which appeared before the volunteer realized that he was making a decision, and the unconscious brain process seemed to know in advance how he would make a decision.

Until now, the prep brain process has been used as evidence of "determinism". Determinism holds that free will is just an illusion and that decisions are made by unconscious brain processes rather than by the "conscious self."

John-Dylan Haines, a professor at the Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience at Charitt Hospital, said that a person's decision-making is not at the mercy of unconscious and early brain waves, and people can actively intervene in the decision-making process and interrupt their actions. Previously people used prep brain signals to oppose free will, but now our research shows that freedom is much less restricted than previously thought.

Of course there is, but that kind of free will is also in God's control.

Free will is a professional concept in philosophy, understood as the decision of the conscious mind to choose what to do, that is, the initiative of the will.

There is no universally agreed definition of free will. The philosophical community does not have a uniform definition of free will; The "free will" that people talk about in everyday life is different from the "free will" as understood by the judicial and psychological circles.

In its broadest sense, free will is the ability of people to decide whether or not to do something according to the conditions they have.

Chinese name. Free will.

Foreign name. free will

Brief introduction. Free will is the belief or philosophical theory that humans can choose their own behavior (a concept that is sometimes extended to animals or computerized artificial intelligence). In layman's terms, it means that human desire is not completely controlled by the brain, and that human free will has the highest authority over human beings, and that free will is considered to be a moral judgment and is therefore supported by many religious organizations.

In general usage, the term has an additional meaning of objectivity, with objective being the actor's action not being completely influenced by tacit factors, and subjective being the actor's belief that his or her actions are due to his or her own will.

The main structures that constitute free will include a variety of aspects, for example, in the context of religion, free will may mean that the all-powerful "god" or some mysterious force does not control the will and choices of individuals by their power; In ethics, free will may mean that individuals are morally responsible for their actions; In psychology, this means that the mind controls parts of the body's movements; In science, free will may mean that the actions of the body, including the brain, are not entirely determined by physical causes and effects.

Quantum mechanics does not support free will, but matter has uncertainty such as probability waves, but it still has stable objective laws, does not depend on human will, denies fatalism, and the microcosm constitutes the macrocosm. First, there is still an insurmountable distance between this randomness at the micro scale and the macro scale in the usual sense. Second, it is difficult to prove whether this randomness is irreducible, because things are a diverse whole composed of their own independent evolution, and there is a dialectical relationship between chance and necessity.

The existence or absence of free will has been a central issue in the history of philosophy and science.