Which of these two sentences is true?

Yes, but the second sentence is a declarative sentence order, you see, which is the subject, was is a verb, the way to the bus stop is the predicate, the main + system + table Standard declarative sentence order! Hehe, because here the question is asked about the subject of the object clause, the sentence order remains the same!

The interrogative pronoun as the subject of the way to the bus stop was......

Obviously the logic is wrong, because the question is how to get there, not what the way is.

The teacher asked me which class he was in is right Not always which is the subject You have to restore the sentence to see it.

This sentence he was in class 1 is known as restore.

i told him what i did 。What is the object of the verb.

i did sth。

It should be a definite clause!

I guessed.

You listened to me and made sense.

i asked him

Let's look at the front, there is already a subject-verb-object.

The following clause which leads is to modify what he asked.

That's the definite from the distance, and there is no problem with eight.

I'm not so sure.

i asked him which was the way to the bus stop.

which is the subject.

The subject is in front of the predicate, which is the declarative sentence order.

A has no grammatical errors, but the second sentence is better in the past perfect tense. So to speak:

when i arrived at the bus station， bus had left.

i no sooner arrived at the bus station than bus was gone.

b has grammatical errors, when the sentence after the sentence is missing the verb, when leads the sentence here, the complete subject-verb-object is needed, just add a were:

what did you say when you were from a to b?

Both of these sentences are sick sentences.

In the first sentence, replace "was left" with "had left."

The second sentence when the guided clause lacks a predicate verb, from a to b is a prepositional phrase, which can be regarded as a predicate and can be added as a conjunctive verb.

When I arrived at the bus station, the bus had already left

None of them are right. The main reason may be that the parts of speech of the words are not clear.

The "was left" in the first sentence is a verb + predicate structure, and the verb cannot be a predicate.

It can be changed to: when i arrived at the bus station, number 20 bus was not there.

The "you from a to b" sentence in the second sentence is missing a predicate verb.

It can be changed to: what did you say when you was from a to b?

Or turn it into a word: what did you say during from a to b?

The first sentence is not in the right voice, was left is the passive voice, and it is correct to directly use left or had left to form the active voice. The second sentence doesn't know what you want to express, the clause is incorrect, and the predicate is missing, if it is fromatob, then you can add were

root, pinyin: [gēn] Interpretation: The part of the stem of a higher plant that grows in the soil. The base of the object is connected to something else. The origin of things. Thorough. basis, as the fundamental. A measure word that refers to something that is long strips.

I think that's how it's written:

when i arrived at the bus station，number 20 bus had left.

The first sentence, love

doingsth.Or lovetodo

sth means liking to do something.

The subject is she, the third person, and the predicate should be added with s

"The reality is that there is no reason, no excuse"lity

isthereisno

reason,no

excuse"Our suspicions are traitors, let's lose the good things that we would normally win"oursuspicionisa

traitor,let

uslose

thegood

things

usually

win"Gray area"gray

zone