Which verb should be used to ask questions in antonym interrogative sentences IS, ARE, DID, DO do no

1, the verb be includes am, is, are, you know for sure you are....This sentence, so the antonym is aren't

2, might is the same as must, you only need to look at the person now to indicate just now, belonging to the past. itself should be an ISN't he becomes wasn't he.

3, it must have rained yesterday, simplify the sentence it rained yesterday. So the antonym is didn't.

That's it.

First, find out the content of the rhetorical question, and then look at whether there are be verbs, auxiliary verbs, etc., and tenses in the original sentence. There is also a mantra: before or after the will, before the back of the no.

The past tense of a verb in the sense of the substance: It is the past tense of the verb in the sense of the substance. For example, do becomes the negative clause of the substantive verb did: it is to add don to the subject after the subject't or doesn't't etc.

General interrogative sentences of substantial verbs: It is a special interrogative sentence that advances the auxiliary verb and restores the substantial verb to the substantial verb: it is a special interrogative sentence at the beginning of the sentence on the basis of the general interrogative sentence.

A past of a real verb.

bai: is to turn the real verb du into its past zhi form.

The negative sentence of the substantive verb is to add don after the subject of the reply't or doesn't't etc.

One-answer interrogative sentence of substantial verbs: It is a special interrogative sentence that advances the auxiliary verb and restores the substantial verb to the substantial verb: it is a special interrogative sentence at the beginning of the sentence on the basis of the general interrogative sentence.

The past tense of a verb in the sense of the substance: It is the past tense of the verb in the sense of the substance. Regular verbs are generally followed by an inner ed, and those ending with an unpronounced ej are directly added with d, and irregular ones can only be memorized by rote.

The negative sentence of the substantive verb: is to add don after the subject't or doesn't'General interrogative sentences of substantive verbs such as t: It is a special interrogative sentence that advances the auxiliary verb and restores the substantive verb to the substantive verb

On the basis of the general question sentence, it is enough to add a special question word at the beginning of the sentence.

Declarative sentences. I am a teacher. He was a teacher. They are all teachers.

i am a teacher. /he is a teacher. /they are teachers.

Negative sentence: I am not a teacher. He is not a teacher. They're not teachers.

i am not a teacher. /he is not a teacher./they are not teachers.

Interrogative sentences. Am I a teacher? Is he a teacher? Are they teachers?

am i a teacher? /is he a teacher?/ are they teachers？

Declarative sentences. my coat is red.

Negative sentences. my coat is not red.

General defeat with envy and questioning sentences.

is your coat red?

Special old funny question sentences.

what colour is your coat?

1. A rhetorical question is a rhetorical method, while an interrogative sentence is a sentence structure. A rhetorical question is a rhetorical tone to express an affirmative meaning, and the answer is already contained in the question, and the other party does not need to answer; For example: How can you do this?

Meaning you can't do that), people can grasp the true meaning of the expressor from the rhetorical question. Rhetorical questioning is also called radical questioning, cross-examination, and cross-examination. And the interrogative sentence is asking the other party, not knowing the answer, and needing the other party to answer.

For example: What time did you wake up today? -Seven.

2. What is the function of rhetorical questions" and "interrogative sentences"?

The role of rhetorical questions: rhetorical questions can strengthen the tone, make people think deeply, stimulate the reader's feelings, deepen the reader's impression, and enhance the momentum and persuasiveness of the text.

1) The piano is as heavy as a coffin, and the violin costs tens of hundreds of yuan each. Although the manufacturing is fine, how many people in the world can enjoy it? (Feng Zikai, "Sheltering from the Rain in the Mountains").

The affirmative sentence is a negative expression through a rhetorical question.

2) I was thinking to myself, is there no one in the quiet bamboo sea? (Huang Montaigne, "People in the Depths of the Bamboo Forest").

The negative sentence is a rhetorical question that expresses a positive meaning.

3) The voice is not very good, a little hoarse, a little burrgy. But is a public teaching class a performance on stage? Can a person with a bad voice just hide in the woods and read the texts he likes? Jingjing was very uncomfortable. (Huang Beijia's "Voice of the Heart").

Use concentrated rhetorical questions or continuous rhetorical questions to express emotional emotions to enhance the appeal of the article.

4) There is not a single anti-people force in history that has not been destroyed by the people! Didn't Hitler and Mussolini both fall before the people? (Wen Yiduo, "The Last Speech").

Declarative sentence (affirmative, negative): he

issixyears

old.shedidn’t

hearofyou

before.

2) Interrogative sentences (general, special, choice, rebuttal) :d othey

likeskating?

howold

ishe?ishe

sixorseven

yearsold?

marycanswim,can’t

she?3) Imperative sentence: be

careful,boys;

don’ttalk

Incl for Tan Stack Gan Ji imitation wet splatter ass

4) Exclamation: how

clever

theboyis!

Summary. Step 1 Antisense interrogative sentence is preceded by negation, followed by affirmation, preceded affirmation and followed by negation.

he+can'What is the antonymous interrogative sentence of t+do+what+he+said.

The answer is can he?

The specific analysis is as follows.

Step 1 Antisense interrogative sentence is preceded by negation, followed by affirmation, preceded affirmation and followed by negation.

Part 2 Because the first half of the sentence negates all the affirmations that follow.

The third step is to put forward the first half of the sentence such as the be verb or other verbs The subject is not a celebration of the verb and the subject is quiet.

Because there are other verbs in this question, can

Step 4: The answer is can he?

Expansion: The first sentence means that he can't do what he says.

Second, this is do, followed by an object clause.

Thirdly, what is an object in an object clause, it cannot be changed to that, and it cannot be replaced here, because that is an object in an object clause is a three-no product.

That is, "no ingredients, no meaning, no omission."

But there is a lack of object in this, so you can't change that

In summary, the answer to the antonym question is can he ? Other knowledge points should also be paid attention to

Answer: I think he can't do this,【can he】?

I don't think he can do this, can he?

The antonym question sentence is preceded by no and then yes, and the front is used before and after no, and the negation can is used in front't, so use affirmation later.