What rights did the owner infringe on by the property renting the villa to the crew without authoriz

The property rented the villa to the crew without the consent of the owner, which violated the owner's right to privacy, property and the right to use the house.

First of all, it violates the owner's right to privacy, regardless of whether the house is inhabited at this time, the property rents the house to the crew for filming without the consent of the owner, and broadcasts it on TV, etc., so that the owner does not know it, the house structure, the facilities in the house are exposed to the public eye, and a house, no matter how big or small, is a person's home, and it is a place where you can return to relax at any time. And the property did not tell the owner during the filming that the owner saw the film and television works on TV that the furnishings in the house were consistent with the decoration style of his villa, and after careful investigation, he found that it was the villa where he did not live, and more than one drama used his own villa, which shows that there are many unknown people who entered their homes without their knowledge, which hurt their privacy. <>

There is also a violation of the property rights of the owner, the property rents the villa to the crew in a profitable way, without notifying the owner, putting the rent into his own pocket, and during the filming process, the items in the house are damaged, and many furniture calligraphy and paintings are damaged, so that the owner's property has been damaged, these losses are not borne by the owner, and the things are put in his own home, but he is lost without knowing it, so that the owner's property rights are damaged. <>

Violated the owner's right to use the house, the right to use the house of this villa belongs to the owner, not to the property, when the villa is rented to the crew, the right to use the house is transferred to the property, so that the owner's right to use the house is harmed, the property does not have the right to use the house, the owner hands over the key to the property, is to hope that the property will be properly managed when the owner is not there, instead of renting the house privately. Although the owner does not live in this villa, it does not mean that this house can be disposed of casually. <>

The owner has the right to the real estate in his own name, and the ownership is simply the right to complete control, so the property owner's unauthorized leasing of the house violates the owner's ownership, and based on this, the owner has the right to claim tort liability compensation. It also violates the privacy of the owner.

The villa is the private property of the owner, and the property rents the villa to the crew without authorization, which violates the owner's ownership and privacy rights.

Renting the villa to the crew mainly violates the ownership of the house and the owner's right to know, which is an obvious illegal and criminal act.

The property violates the owner's right to privacy and property because the property does so without the owner's approval.

This is a private house, it is illegal, the owner of the house is already very tolerant, just let them lose money, otherwise there will be more serious consequences, the owner's right to use the house, privacy has been violated.

Yes, it is necessary, and it is very disrespectful to use your own things without your consent.

I think that if it is indeed the property that made it happen, then the property should be sued, because after all, people who are not involved should not be sued.

Of course, the owners are going to sue the property, they used their villa to make money without authorization, and the crew also caused some damage to the interior of the villa during filming.

In fact, for the owner, buy the house, renovate the house, and live in. Many people are willing to entrust the property to take care of it, so that they can also worry about it, but remember to sign an agreement with the property, which must be specific and clear, including the relationship of rights and obligations and the liability for breach of contract, and to maximize the responsibility of the property. Be careful and go home in time to check in case the room is used for profit.

A woman can protect her own interests and demand compensation from the other party by violating her property rights and privacy rights. A lawsuit can also be brought against a property for failing to comply with the key custody agreement.

The main problem is the property, and the property must be held accountable, not only to get back the rent of the villa that was used as a filming location, but also to compensate the property for the loss of the items in the villa.

The woman should keep the evidence first, and then report the case directly to the local public security department to punish the arrogant property.

A woman can go to a lawyer's office or the procuratorate to exercise her rights and sue the property for encroaching on her house property rights and renting it to the crew without the owner's permission, so the property is illegal.

It is still impossible to determine whether the crew is renting the villa without knowing it, and the ownership of the house will be determined and the relevant contract will be signed for normal renting, obviously the crew has not fulfilled the relevant matters, the property should be mainly responsible, and the crew is not completely without responsibility.

Whether the crew was deceived by the property or knew the inside story is still uncertain. It is clear that the property has the primary responsibility for entrusting the keys to the property only for emergency use such as repairs, but the property lends the property without authorization and reaps the benefits. In addition to the key, the property did not have the relevant proof that it had the right to lend the villa, but it was able to lend the villa to at least three crews, and the crew rented the venue at a high cost, why did the relevant responsible personnel rent the villa without confirming the ownership, whether they signed a relevant contract with the property, and the crew also had the possibility of renting the villa at a low price knowing that it was not compliant, and the crew needed to prove that they rented the villa without knowing it, and they were also the injured party.

After the incident, the crew did not actively cooperate to find out the truth of the matter, and the attitude was confusing. If the crew's behavior is completely legal and compliant, the crew should actively cooperate with the investigation and directly provide an intermediary contact, it is not difficult to find the truth of the matter, and it can prove its innocence, on the contrary, the crew's attitude is very arrogant and completely refuses to communicate, which is very confusing. If the crew is innocent in the whole thing, the crew should actively cooperate to find the real responsible person and calm down the incident, maybe there is no hidden situation in it.

The crew entered the villa for filming without the permission of the owner of the villa, and damaged the house and some items inside, and the crew is also liable for compensation. How much responsibility the specific crew has and how much compensation should be determined by the final court trial.

According to the property law, the owner of the house has the right to occupy, use, benefit and dispose of his house. Therefore, the crew is still facing infringement allegations, but the specific responsibility still depends on the specific situation, and the crew violated the rights of the owner without knowing it, so the responsibility is relatively less.

First of all, the property is a service industry, and it is a property that provides services for the owners of the community, and does not have absolute control over the finances of the community.

Yes. The crew should be compensated for damaging the house, and the unauthorized rental of the property should also be compensated.

The crew does not need to be compensated, what should be compensated is the property. Because the crew didn't know that the villa had been sold.

Should the property be rented to the crew regardless of whether the owner has agreed to rent the house? There is no doubt that the crew destroyed things in the house and destroyed things that did not belong to him in the first place, so they should be compensated.

After buying a super luxurious villa in her hometown 5 years ago, Ms. Lin has been working and living in Hangzhou and has no time to go back. One day, Ms. Lin suddenly saw on a TV series called "Me and My Children" that her villa had become the home of the heroine in the play. Ms. Lin urgently went home to find that her villa had been rented to the crew by the property and was made a mess.

There is also such a clip in the movie "See You or Leave", Li Qing played by Xu Fan works as a maid in a family in the United States, and Liu Yuan played by Ge You came to her to discuss, saying that a friend's crew wanted to borrow this house to make a movie, only for one day and would not break things. Li Qing relented for a while and agreed. didn't think about it, the crew came, and it didn't matter if they borrowed it or not, smoking, littering, wiring indiscriminately, and the house was like they bought it themselves.

Not only did it leave a lot of indelible marks, but it also damaged a lot of furniture. It can be seen that if you don't lend the house to the crew, you will already be revealed to us audiences.

However, without discussion, the villa he hadn't lived in for a long time was actually lent to the crew by the property company for filming, and it was also messed up, making the house out of shape. I'm afraid this is unacceptable to anyone, although the homeowner has sued the property, but in addition to the property, does the crew also have to pay part of the responsibility?

The property management company "is not immune to blame, because he has signed a "key escrow agreement" with the owner. But how did the crew get in? If the property is leased privately, then there is no doubt that the property needs to pay full responsibility, after all, it is very likely that the crew is unaware.

But if the crew didn't get the keys through the property, it's not just the property that needs to be sued.

Is the property a tort or a breach of contract? The owner has ownership of the immovable property in his own name, so the property owner's unauthorized rental of the house violates the owner's ownership, so the owner can sue the property for infringement. However, it is also possible for the property to constitute a breach of contract.

Because the property and the landlord have signed a service contract, under the circumstances required by the contract, the property rents the house privately, which is obviously a breach of contract, and from this point of view, the property still has a breach of contract. Therefore, the owner can sue the property for breach of contract and infringement to protect his rights.

The women's villa was requisitioned by the crew, and the property was faced with the interests of the owner, and the owner could file a lawsuit by finding a lawyer.

The owner should recover the expropriated fees from the property, and at the same time sue the property, and the property disposes of the house without the consent of the owner, which is also an act of trespassing on the house, and the owner should defend his rights legitimately.

The owner applied the law to protect his rights, and the woman has reported the case and claimed 3 million yuan from the property and crew through the court and apologized, and removed the TV series from the shelves.

The women's villa was requisitioned by the crew and faced with the property of the first interest, and the owner should join the crew to sue the property in court and ask for compensation!

Take advantage of the popularity of the law and the Internet to collect relevant evidence, protect rights in accordance with the law, and put forward reasonable legal demands.

Recently, Ms. Lin found that her villa appeared in a TV series that was broadcast, which was an idle property of her own. In this regard, Ms. Lin sued the two property companies in the early and late stages of the villa, the developer Ningbo Xiangyuan Hejing Real Estate Development ****, and the TV series producer iQiyi Platform for the crimes of infringing on other people's property and violating others' privacy. It is conceivable that the use of other people's goods without their consent is a violation of the property rights of others.

Moreover, this shooting is in Ms. Lin's villa, which has caused the crime of violating the privacy of others.

Finally, I believe that Ms. Lin can recover her losses through a method. Eventually, the law will be on the side of the victim to protect the victim and punish the violator.

Privacy is definitely there, the villa must have an owner, filming without the owner's consent violates the owner's privacy, and how did the crew get into the villa.

The property crew violated the privacy of the homeowner, as well as the right to use the rent, causing huge losses to the homeowner and infringing on the personal property of the homeowner, which is very wrong.

It was the woman's right to privacy that was violated by the property crew because they entered the house without the consent of the owner of the house.

Of course not! When a house is purchased by the owner, the owner has ownership of the house, and the right to use the house is included in the ownership. That is to say,The right to use the house belongs to the owner, and the property does not have the right to determine the owner's right to use the house.

The owner's property rights include house ownership and land use rights, of which the house ownership is permanent, that is, as long as the owner does not give the house to others, then the house ownership owned by the owner is permanently vested in the owner. Among them, the ownership of the house includes the owner's right to occupy the houseThe right to use their premisesThe owner can dispose of all the above rights of the property within the scope of the law, and the rights to transfer, trade, rent, mortgage and other rights belong to the ownerWithout the permission of the owner, others are not allowed to carry out the above activities on the house.

So what role does property play in community management? Generally speaking, a property company is an organization that is hired by the owner to manage the community in the community. The rights of the property management company are mainly as follows:

1.The property can formulate relevant management rules and regulations for the community; 2.The property can charge the owner a certain management fee in accordance with the contract and relevant regulations; 3.

The property can be managed in accordance with the contract signed with the owner; 4.The property has the right to hire other companies to undertake special management business in certain communities; 5.The property has the right to request a committee formed by the owners to assist the property in the management of the community; 6.

The property has the right to stop the owner from violating the regulations of the community; 7.The property can be operated within the scope permitted by laws and regulations, and its income can be used to supplement the management expenses required by the community.

As can be seen from the above, the property management company does not have the right to determine the owner's right to use the property, and the property needs to protect the safety of the owner and his house. On this issue, the property not only does not have the right to provide the owner's house to the crew for the filming of film and television dramas, but also has the obligation to ensure the basic safety of the house for the owner. In any respect, the property management company has no right to interfere with the owner's right to use the house without permission.