Escape from Tehran authenticity, what is the authenticity of Escape from Tehran?

It can only be said that there is such a thing, and the historical background is real.

However, the Americans exaggerated the role of the United States and narrowed the role of Canada in this. In fact, Canada took a big risk by taking in these American diplomats in the first place. Canada asked both sides to cooperate in evacuating the Americans, not because of any pressure on Canada, but because Canada had decided to close its embassy so that American diplomats would have nowhere to hide.

In fact, when the United States made a mistake when it made a fake visa (the passport is a real Canadian passport), it was discovered by the Canadian embassy staff.

On the other hand, the whole rescue was not so sinister at all, there was no children's puzzle to find that the American hostages were reduced, nor the airport guard suddenly became suspicious of this wave of Americans with Canadian passports, let alone the scene of the police car chasing the plane, the only thrill was in the airport waiting room after being told that the flight was delayed due to mechanical failure, Joseph Stafford, who was very frustrated at the beginning and refused to actively cooperate, picked up a local newspaper. At this point, it suddenly occurred to him that the people in the Canadian film crew did not read Persian newspapers. He was still calling the other people's real names, which made everyone nervous.

Finally, there is the fact that the US authorities never abruptly halted the rescue plan.

Of course, Canada paid some costs when it was an ally of the United States, such as Iran announcing the severance of diplomatic relations (in fact, Canada had closed all its embassies and consulates before). But at that moment, the gratitude of Americans to Canada was still real.

Really, this was the most famous Tehran hostage incident that year, but in fact, the Iranian side was also difficult to ride, otherwise those six people in history would not have gone so easily.

It's basically true, but it's not lacking in the over-exaggeration, exaggeration, and exaggeration of many aspects such as personal heroism.

Big brother, I'll tell you about it on Sunday.

In 1963, in order to build a secular Iran, Shah Pahlavi launched the "White Revolution" centered on the reform of the agricultural and land systems, which soon made Iran the ninth largest economy in the world. Bazaar (Persian for "bazaar") merchants, closely associated with traditional handicrafts, were so fearful of industrialization that they began to use their vast funds that were not controlled by ** to support the anti-king forces. In 1979, due to the sluggishness and weakness of the United States, the increasingly fierce revolution forced Pahlavi**, and Khomeini, who had been in exile for 15 years, finally waited for the opportunity to open the curtain of the Islamic Revolution.

On October 22, 1979, Pahlavi went to the United States for medical treatment, and the anti-American wave in Iran became increasingly high, strongly demanding that the United States hand over Pahlavi; On November 4, angry Iranian university students and militiamen seized the U.S. Embassy in Iran and took 66 U.S. diplomats and civilians hostage. The protracted Iranian hostage crisis has become the number one news that shocked the world.

The plan to use the opportunity of the "fake movie" to find a location in Iran to rescue the six Americans hiding in the Canadian embassy is obviously whimsical, but because of this, there are no twists and turns. Preliminary preparations such as buying scripts, setting up studios, holding press conferences, and advertising laid the foundation for the later victorious escape. Hollywood's self-deprecation and the reality of its domination by the left are on full display.

The film shows no mercy for Pahlavi, whose corruption and spy rule sparked the revolution; The critique of Khomeini is also straightforward, with the occupation of embassies, the streets of violent corpses, and fake shootings speak for themselves.

Footage of Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps soldiers taking an interest in the sketches of the "fake movie" shows that humanity is all connected, and that the psychological distance between Hollywood and Iran, between the East and the West, may not be as far away as politicians and religious leaders think. Unfortunately, there are too few such flashes for the film as a whole.

Pahlavi's efforts to secularize and Westernize Iran have not been all in vain with the collapse of his regime. Even when Khomeini was in full swing with the Islamic Revolution, Iranian society could not erase the Pahlavi imprint. The Iranian constitution establishes the principle of "permanent separation of powers", and the parliament is elected through direct elections, and there is a certain degree of supervision and restraint between powers.

All this is reflected in the film, and the image of the Iranian militia is the same and brutal, lacking a three-dimensional sense.

I've never liked Ben Affleck. Whether it is "Soul Catcher" and "Pearl Harbor" during his invincible youth, or "The Thief in the City" that he acted and directed with You, the common shortcomings are full of ingenuity. The opinion of Time magazine speaks for many:

Despite its efforts to curry favor with O'Hyska, "Escape from Tehran" is mediocre in terms of quality. ”

The film "Escape from Tehran" is a biographical drama directed by Ben Affleck, on November 4, 1979, when the Iranian Revolution reached its peak, militants stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and took 52 hostages.

At the same time, six Americans took advantage of the chaos to escape and hide in the Canadian embassy in Iraq, but given the situation, it was only a matter of time before they were found or even executed.

In order to rescue the six trapped people, the CIA appointed a **Tony Mendez, who is proficient in camouflage skills, to be in charge of the hostage rescue operation. Then he devised an incredible plan.

Disguised as a filmmaker, the six hostages who were trapped falsely claimed to be the crew members of Mendez, who were working on a movie called "Escape from Tehran."

I know why this movie is so high at the box office and still won an Oscar. The United States bullies other countries, helps other countries build puppets**, and oppresses the people of other countries. Then the people of other countries rose up to resist, and some Americans were kidnapped, and they were upset and tried every means to rescue the hostages, and then a series of touching things happened.

Americans are proud of it, but forget that they are all self-inflicted. It's just to make them feel better inside.

"Escape from Tehran" is based on a magazine article titled "How the CIA Relies on a Fake Movie to Bring Americans Out of Tehran", which is consistent with real history, but because this historical event is controversial, it may not be true.

Down with US imperialism, the US is a meat grinder.

Down with the American Academy Awards, all the awards in the United States are cultural colonization.

Down with Ben Affleck, influential figures in the United States are all in the service of US imperialism.

"Escape from Tehran" is based on true events and is worthy of being a classic movie.

There is information that says it's true, but who knows?

In fact, it has been explained in the movie that these six people escaped, and the others were directly arrested. The arrested people were the U.S. ambassador to Iran and diplomats, and theoretically these people were in the embassy as if they were on U.S. soil, and on the one hand, they violated the territory of the United States, and on the other hand, there was no legal process to sentence them. The only way to do this is to detain and then negotiate.

In fact, Iran's practice is already an illegitimate means under abnormal circumstances. Therefore, the United States can use diplomacy or even war to legally resolve the hostage issue. So these hostages are a normal political issue.

It can be rescued normally.

But the six people who escaped could not be rescued in this way, because if they did, it would be difficult to tell them where they came from, and Iran had every reason to try them, because they were probably spies. So these people are not safe. In fact, the end of the movie says that the United States gave up on bailouts, which makes sense, because Iran will soon be able to find these six people, and the staff roster clearly indicates that there are six people.

So these people are just ambassadors who have not been arrested, not spies. It's easy to figure out that if Iran wants to kill these people, then the United States has a reason to do whatever it takes. So the insecurity of these six people is during the period when the roster is not all stitched together.

Other times it's safe.

The others have been taken under control and cannot be saved, but in the end of history, Iran still released all the hostages, but it was only a short time.

What is the film: Escape from Tehran about?

Hello, glad to have your question. The Escape from Tehran is based on a magazine article titled "How the CIA Relies on a Fake Movie to Bring Mi People Out of Tehran", titled "Argo"** A frank allusion to the hostage crisis of Yi Lang. In 1979, the embassy of the United States in Yi Lang was surrounded by the Yi Lang People's League, which had just won the victory of Yi Lang, and 66 diplomats and civilians of the United States were held hostage for 444 days.

During this period, a Zhong intelligence agency ** Tony Mendez, who is proficient in camouflage skills, planned a rescue plan and successfully took away six American diplomats trapped in the embassy of the Canadian University in Yi Lang.