What did the early Hubble telescope see, and why did it say it saw the last moments of the sun s lif

Updated on tourism 2024-05-10
18 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The Hubble telescope saw the demise of a star, and the last moments of the star's life were captured by the Hubble telescope from afarAllowing humanity to better understand the demise of stars.

    We all know that stars have a life cycle just like us humansThis means that they will also be born, old, sick and die, but the life of stars is much longer, and we humans have no way to see the whole process of stars from birth to death. Because the lifespan of a star is often billions or tens of billions of years, no one can live that long. Our assumptions about solar life are based on some scientific speculation, but humans have not seen the extinction of stars very much.

    Because there is only one star in the solar system, and human technology does not allow us to fly out of the solar system.

    What the Hubble telescope sees is supposed to be a star** moment, but this should be far away. Because the impact of stars is very strong, equivalent to tens of billions of nuclear bombs at the same time. At the same time, I personally think that what he can photograph should be the light left by the star ** many light years ago, and we know that light also has speedFrom the location of the star** to the location of the Hubble telescope, there may have been many light-years in between.

    One light year is equivalent to a certain amount of time, so I think he can photograph this sun many years ago.

    To sum up, I think the Habo telescope is indeed seeing the moment of the sun. But time is not now, it should be a long time past. So I think we can only know some of the characteristics of the sun through this shot.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Because he saw a dying star, he deduced that the sun had an end of life like it.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Because the Hubble telescope observed a dying star, it was thought that the sun was similar to this star and would die later.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    At that time, technology was not very developed, so people saw something and mistakenly thought that this was the last moment of the sun's life.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Because science was not very developed at that time, people had a deep misunderstanding.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Introduction: The telescope is a great invention, through which people can observe all kinds of weather, which is also very helpful for people to understand the universe, and in the process, the telescope is constantly updated. There is also a telescope in the universe, and that is the Hubble Telescope.

    The Hubble telescope can see so far, so why not just use it to observe the planet?

    In fact, the observation distance of the Hubble telescope is very far, first of all, there is no weakening effect of the earth's atmosphere in outer space, so the observation distance will be farther. And the Hubble telescope is not an optical telescope, so the observation distance of the Hubble telescope is very far, in fact, the Hubble telescope can be used to observe the planet, for example, Jupiter and Saturn in the solar Qingzhen system can be directly observed, and it is very clear, you can see the color and shape of the surface of the planet. But these planets have actually sent out corresponding probes, and there are probes to observe, so there is no need to use the Hubble telescope.

    Moreover, the Hubble telescope is very widely used, mainly to observe new bodies hundreds of millions of light years away, and it is impossible for the Hubble telescope to undertake too many tasks at this time, so it can undertake some tasks that other instruments cannot do, so that the Hubble telescope can play the greatest purpose.

    In fact, the Hubble telescope is very old, has been in use for a long time, and will soon be retired. But there is still no space telescope that can be launched into the sky, which means that there is no way to get the data that people have failed to believe. This situation is still sad for many people, so I hope that more telescopes can be sent into space, so that people can better observe the universe.

    And this is very helpful for the exploration of the universe and the development of astronomy, and the Hubble telescope has indeed brought a lot of fresh information and knowledge to people, so it is also hoped that more telescopes that are better than the Hubble telescope can be invented.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Because there is no point in observing the planets, the main role of the Hubble telescope is to find the boundaries of the universe, and it is too wasteful for you to observe the planets.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Because if you use it directly to observe the planet, you can only observe the surface of the planet, and it is a bit overkill to observe the planet in this way.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    There may be certain problems when observing, and they are not particularly detailed, so such problems occur.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    There are indeed many people who have questions about this issue, but in fact it is due to a conceptual misunderstanding. First of all, it is a fact that according to the special theory of relativity, the speed of light in a vacuum is the fastest in the universe. At a distance of 13.7 billion light years, it would take 13.7 billion years for light to get there, and that's true.

    The mistake with this concept lies in how the Hubble Space Telescope looks at distant stars.

    <> Hubble didn't shoot out his eyes to look at distant galaxies (or other celestial bodies) and then come back. Rather, it is the light from galaxies that reaches Earth through space, and Hubble captures this light so it can see distant galaxies. There is no such thing as vision, and there is no such thing as vision, which is many times faster than the speed of light.

    These are all wrong concepts. Both the Hubble Space Telescope and the human eye can see objects because the light (or reflected light) from these objects enters the telescope or eye and is imaged.

    The farthest galaxy Hubble has seen so far is 13.1 billion light-years away, suggesting that it existed 13.1 billion years ago, when its light traveled through space and 13.1 billion years to Earth, where it was captured by Hubble. Hubble saw what the Milky Way looked like 13.1 billion years ago. We know that the universe was born 13.8 billion years ago, which means we can only see galaxies within 13.8 billion light-years (the speed of light multiplied by time) around Earth.

    Because as the universe expands, galaxies 13.8 billion light-years away from us at speeds faster than the speed of light, their light is no longer in our event horizon. In fact, the entire universe is 93 billion light-years wide, which means that a large part of it will never be seen by us.

    Detailed interpretation of the problem, I hope it will help you, if you have any questions, you can leave me a message in the comment area, you can comment with me more, if there is something wrong, you can also interact with me more, if you like the author, you can also follow me, your like is the biggest help to me, thank you.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Because this telescope took a relatively deep and wide image of the universe, it took a total of 250 days, this telescope can observe 13.4 billion years ago, this telescope has reached 540 kilometers from the ground from the ground, has not been affected by the earth's environment, the main horn of this telescope has quietly reached meters, can observe ultraviolet light or mirror infrared light, the sensitivity of spiritual liquid slag is particularly high.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The Hubble Space Telescope captures light from galaxies and reaches the Earth through space, so we can see distant galaxies, and the speed of light in galaxies is faster than that of Earth, and it is possible that we will not be able to observe galaxies.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    After adjusting for the defects, the Awa Space Telescope's resolution reached the theoretical diffraction limit, so some people would think that it had reached the implementation limit.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Because now mankind knows that the distance of the universe has far exceeded the limits of the Hubble telescope, and it can only see a limited number of things.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    When the Hubble telescope was put into use, it was actually a big surprise. Because it is very blurry to shoot home**, it is not at all what everyone expects to be able to shoot clear outer space**. The reason for this is due to an error in the process of correcting the mirror glass of the Hubble telescope.

    However, the Hubble Telescope, which has a large investment in such a project and bears everyone's expectations, cannot be so obsolete.

    So three years later, NASA sent a spacecraft to carry seven astronauts to outer space to renovate the Hubble telescope, and finally the Hubble telescope was able to work normally. Two years later, the Hubble telescope photographed a stunning photograph of the Pillars of Creation. According to the inference of scientists, the image in this photo is likely to be a star orbit, and the test-tube embryos of the planet are also photographed in it.

    In the same year, using a long-term exposure that lasted 10 days, the Hubble telescope captured another starlight map of outer space.

    From the ** we can see that in the extensive regulation, the galaxy is evenly and widely spread, which includes more than 3,000 planets. It also made people realize for the first time that there is no such thing as a unique being on Earth. The well-known thinker Yuanda once said that there are two objects in the world that can shake people's hearts, one is the noble moral standard in people's hearts, and the other is the brilliant starry sky above their heads.

    That starry sky is not only a natural scenery for everyone to see under the condition of relieving boredom under the starry sky.

    A lot of it is to arouse people's curiosity and encourage people to leave the earth and step into the longer cosmic starry sky, which is only our home, which is as insignificant as a drop in the ocean in the Milky Way. The Hubble telescope bears people's ideals, and it bears everyone's expectations. On April 24, 1990, the Discovery spacecraft took off with the Hubble telescope and successfully entered a 575-kilometer orbit with a shrouded track.

    The Hubble telescope is named after the British Comu scientist Hubble in memory of his dedication to the development of astronomy.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The area of the shooting range is about 1/24 million of the area of the whole day. It looked dark and empty. However, after a long wait, Hubble was able to capture the famous Hubble Extreme Deepfield.

    There are as many as 5,500 starry systems in this area, each of which contains hundreds of millions of stars. These galaxies are extremely faint and only 10 billion times brighter than the limit of what the human eye can see, and the galaxies in the Hubble Extreme Deep Field are very far from Earth. They are located 13.2 billion light-years away, which is already the observation limit of the Hubble telescope.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    On April 24, 1990, the Space Shuttle Discovery carried the Hubble Telescope into orbit with a distance of 575 kilometers. The Hubble Telescope is named after his friend American astronomer Hubble in honor of his contribution to the development of astronomy.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    1.Astronauts were sent to the sky for maintenance, but this plan could not be implemented because there was no space reserved on the primary mirror system to carry out maintenance operations. 2.

    Sending the space shuttle back into space, dragging the Hubble telescope back from orbit, returning to the ground to re-correct the primary mirror, and finally did not pass this plan, because the implementation period of this plan is too long, and it needs to be re-sent to space, which is too troublesome. 3.Install an optical correction system for the Hubble telescope, and finally use this Fang Nai Eye, which is considered to be a correction system, of course, this program also uses the space shuttle, and 7 Chang Chong Sui astronauts drove the space shuttle to carry 8 tons of equipment and went to space for Hubble maintenance.

    This is the story of Hubble and the results! It's still very beautiful and great!

Related questions
14 answers2024-05-10

In order to facilitate the study and discrimination, the image signals collected by the Hubble telescope will be post-processed into color**, and different information will be expressed in color, so what we see is color.

19 answers2024-05-10

What a terrible question you have is that the Hubble telescope is used to observe aliens? >>>More

7 answers2024-05-10

1000m double barrel is definitely not good, about 250m, my single barrel 80 Puxiao (astronomical), it is not very clear, I have observed an old man. If you want to see what others do, you should need a very high image quality. 1000m is estimated to be more than 150 can be extremely clear, but the landlord may not be able to afford it, more than 4000! >>>More

4 answers2024-05-10

Domestic telescope brands include Boguan, Xingtron, Forester, Esky, Yuzon, and Tucson. Wait. >>>More

4 answers2024-05-10

The angular diameter of the area of the sky that can be well imaged by the telescope is called the field of view of the telescope or the angle of view of the field of view ( ) The field of view of a telescope is often determined at the time of design. The field of view of a telescope is inversely proportional to magnification, and the greater the magnification, the smaller the field of view. Different optical systems, different imaging qualities (due to aberrations), different apertures, and different focal lengths determine the size of the telescope's different fields of view (in the case of astrophotography, the size of the negatives or CCDs also constrains the size of the field of view). >>>More