I want to buy the most cost effective card machine, which brand is good?

When it comes to value for money, casio is preferred.

Casio ZR10, high image quality, high resolution of 12 million pixels. And because of the use of Casio HDR technology, each time you press the shutter, you actually shoot several shots of different degrees, and at the same time combine them into a single wide dynamic range. This technology ensures that both bright and dark areas can be vividly reproduced on the final **, minimizing the generation of waste and overly dark areas, so that the ** looks just like what the human eye sees.

Canon sells very well in China, advertising is done a lot, color is Canon's characteristic, imaging colors are softer and not distorted. The ixus series is a full-fledged card player with a wide range of colors. It looks good, but it sells expensively.

But average value for money. The same level of card machine is hundreds more expensive than other brands. I don't think it's worth the price.

Sony's machines are updated too quickly, but most of them don't have much new ideas, T series manual night scene and panorama mode are highlights, but battery life, imaging effect Sony is not dominant, and Canon, not cost-effective.

The lens of Sony's T-series cameras is too small, and no matter how it is performed, its effect cannot be compared with that of ordinary lens cameras.

In comparison, I still think Casio's card machine is real.

Of course, the Casio ZR10, why we recommend the ZR10, is because of its powerful shutter and high-quality imaging. The Casio ZR10 uses multiple CPUs to process images very quickly, which solves the problem of long shooting intervals in card machines. It only takes seconds to capture wonderful moments.

In addition, the powerful CASIO engine can also realize high-speed continuous shooting, and take photos while recording.

Casio is good, Casio camera is stylish, not expensive, and the imaging is not bad. S200, Z800, Z2300 are all cost-effective models, the one endorsed by Zhou Xun, S200, is very small.

Personally, I think that if you want to consider all aspects, you can choose Nikon's, which is more cost-effective, but it may be a little lower than that of domestic brands, but I personally don't like domestic brands, don't hit me, hehe, I use Panasonic's LX3 myself, and I spent a little more money, hehe, I'm very satisfied.