WP, iOS and Android who are more vulnerable and manipulated

Before I begin, I have to admit that my personal experience with these two mobile operating systems is clearly consistent with the findings and data of that article. On my Galaxy SII, I've seen about two or three apps crash in the past few months. My iPad, on the other hand, crashes several apps every week.

It was the same when I was still using 3gs. Of course, your personal experience may be different. So says Thom Howell.

Interestingly, Android and iOS handle app crashes very differently. On iOS, there is no prompt when the app crashes, which should be felt by both iPad and iHone users, and then just jumped to the main interface. On Android, what you get is to force close the dialog.

Although the concise crash handling method of iOS is convenient, I personally prefer to be notified when it crashes, which is just a personal feeling. I don't know that the app crashed, and I didn't realize that the app had crashed, and I must have pressed the home button or done something, which is very confusing.

Plus, it's easier for Android developers to update their apps in the marketplace than for iOS developers. Google has a much looser grip on its market, and developers can roll out their updates in an instant and fix bugs quickly. On iOS, every update has to go through layers of certification, and developers tend to wait until there are enough changes to update.

Fewer updates mean that vulnerabilities will be left unchecked on iOS devices for longer. All of this shows that there is no right or wrong way to run an app store.

Of course, there are many ifs and buts in the data given in the original text, so the above analysis cannot be accepted as clear and accepted facts. Of course, the topic raised by this is very meaningful.

Android now! iOS security is very high!

Android is a free and open-source** operating system based on Linux, and iOS, like Apple's Mac OS X operating system, is also based on Darwin, so it is also a Unix-like commercial operating system. Originally, this system was called iPhone OS

Unix-like systems (English: UNIX-like) refer to various traditional UNIX systems (such as FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Sun's Solaris) and various systems similar to traditional UNIX (such as MiniX, Linux, QNX, etc.). Although some of them are free software and some are commercial software, they all inherit the characteristics of the original Unix to a considerable extent, have many similarities, and all adhere to the PoSix specification to a certain extent.

The conclusion is that they are all based on the same software kernel and have certain commonalities, which is equivalent to the same family.

The difference is that one is Android and the other is iOS, iOS is optimized, and Android is open.

I'll talk about it from the application side:

The market good thing of iOS apps is charged, and there are more free resources in the Android market. WP8 did not have WP7 and the market reaction was muted.

App compatibility: iOS < WP < Android** iOS >WP > Android

1、IOS is Apple's own,Fluency,Optimization and application are quite powerful in all aspects2、Android was originally acquired by Google,The kernel is Linux,Optimization is not as good as iOS,But the current market share is the highest,And the number of applications is also very large。

3、WP system is Microsoft,The latest is WP8,Compared with WP7 the kernel has been replaced,At present, it is relatively niche,I personally feel that the interface is refreshing,More beautiful,The future is good,But there are still fewer applications。

Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no absolute good or bad!!

The comparison of iOS, Android, and Windows systems is as follows:

The system is relatively stable and smooth, the hardware and software are designed by engineers to be perfect, and the system is relatively closed and single.

2.The Android system is open source, because the background will start a lot of software, and a powerful configuration is required to run various software smoothly, but many users report that Android will be stuck after a long time, but you can use the Android native system, and the operation is very smooth.

There are few applications corresponding to the mobile phone, and the quality of the software is not perfect, the system itself will have some bugs, and the operating system will be a little more complicated than Android. The pros, even low-end phones run smoothly and the operating system is stable.

Android:High openness,After rooting, you can change some system programs according to your preferences。 However, the application experience is relatively widespread, ads, and deductions are flying all over the sky, as long as you grasp it well, it is still very easy to use.

iOS: Jailbreak can escalate permissions, and the app experience is currently the best and colorful.

WP8 said: I don't know if I haven't used it, but the three main streams have their own merits.

Let's have their own love for turnips and cabbage.

Highly recommended Android, I used to be very like you, I like WP8 very much, I always wanted to buy a phone like this, but I know that the system that just came out is not the time to buy it.

But when I waited so long, I didn't hope for the system, I was desperate, I didn't realize that there were still so few WP8 applications.

Did you find that WP8 still can't jailbreak.

There is no finding that WP8 does not jailbreak and there is no call attribution.

Have you found that WP8 has no new movement unless it is two new machines?

Really, it is still highly recommended that Android phones are cheap, with high configurations, and the playability is not good, but I am not saying that WP8's mobile phones are not good, but it is really not suitable to buy now, and the system is still not perfect enough and there are not enough resources.

WP system can't be said to be bad After all, it just came out,There are still relatively few software games in all aspects,If it's used to use,The new mobile phone configuration is very high,,, ios system fluency is needless to say that it's the first,The quality of software games is generally good and the experience is good,But at present, the system interface is single,It's a little troublesome to change the theme or something,,, Android system has been on the market for a while,The current number of software games can be a fight with Apple,The most important thing is to give you high permissions,You can change the system files at will, If you have strong hands-on ability and like DIY, although the experience is poor, all kinds of advertising plug-ins are flooded, but you can make up for it with third-party software,,, a great god said, Apple is used to use, Android is used to play, so it depends on what LZ needs, WP is not considered at present.

Android and iOS often criticize each other, but I think both have their drawbacks. First of all, iOS came out earlier than Android. There's no disputing that Android has a lot of things that mimic iOS.

iOS came first, Android came out late, copied iOS, and developed rapidly. But iOS is too maverick and closed, treating customers as fools, and many natural features have been killed by Apple. Now that Android is developing, ios is maverick, there are not so many advantages, ios has also plagiarized Android, there is always a time when innovation exhausts in a closed system, ios5 plagiarism is just the beginning, and there will be more in the future.

Without iOS, Android wouldn't have appeared.,Think about who copied whom.。

iOS is used all over the world, that is, Apple (-Android, because ** generally low cost users are also many, WP Microsoft feels that it has failed.

iOS, Android system is easier to get started, WP system is more troublesome to get started, but it is better in operability.

It's Android at the moment, and it's definitely WP in the future.

The Android system is good, and the open source system is open.

Android is open, which is its advantage as well as its disadvantage. Needless to say, the advantage of openness is that the disadvantage lies in compatibility, all kinds of different hardware, it is difficult to be fully compatible, and iOS does not have this problem.

Android just watched Apple make money after absorbing the system developed by low-end users, because it is too open, there are too many system versions, resulting in very poor compatibility! And the mobile phone is upgraded quickly. The new mobile phone has been reduced to a second-rate commodity in a few months!

For a normal person, I recommend the Android system, although the iOS software is more powerful, but the price is also over there, or use Android, more affordable.

The difference between open source and non-open source, personal preference for Android, After all, there are many Android users, and iOS is only used for Apple models, and now even MTK Android is available, hehe.

iOS is stable, the resolution is the same, there is no difference between the emulator and the real machine, but it is not open source.

Android has a variety of resolutions, which are very different from those on the emulator and the real machine, open source, and can customize the components.

There are many third-party software in ios, the software is ***, the stability is strong, the system is smooth, there are many optional models of Android, it is easier to crash than ios, there are almost no original big games, there are always ios leftovers, the hardware is different, the software is unsatisfactory, the software market is chaotic, and software developers have no interests and are unwilling to take the initiative to develop.

Although the WP7 interface is a bit ugly, the hardware starts very high, so the game will definitely surpass Android, and even surpass the iPhone that has been changing every year

Of course, if you have money, you can buy an iPhone

Buy Android software The game is all free ios**Too expensive Indeed, the screen is very clear I have used the Apple system to jailbreak Not open source Android** is relatively cheap Now it is popular to buy dual-core Apple 5 is going to come out So it must be to buy Android.