Why can t the cost performance of wp mobile phones be the same as that of Android phones?

Android is open source, and WP has to pay royalties and so on for each device.

I am a copycat engineer, the current MT6572 quad-core machine, mainly four chips, medium frequency, CPU flash power supply, can only say MTK solution, the hardware cost can be very low, not to mention WP licensing fees.

Android technology is mature and rotten streets.

There are more manufacturers who do WP, and ** will naturally come down - from Nokian Lumia 920

It's very simple, because WP doesn't have a copycat machine to compete with it, resulting in ** will not be very low. This is due to the market economy.

Why is WP mobile phone cost-effective? Are they all expensive? It's not that it's not cheap. The choice is yours.

There are too few applications to be mainstream.

Microsoft focuses on user experience – did you know Windows Phone, did you know that Nokia has smartphones? This article is from the high-end Lumia 520

Use "what" at the end of your question - if Yijing hadn't married Nobita in the end, her lifelong persistence would have collapsed in a second.

The licensing fee is higher than Android's, and Microsoft limits the system specifications - from the high-end Lumia 925

I only see a lot of software installed on Android, but there are also many traps for absorbing fees. —From the Windows Phone client.

Qualcomm U plus system licensing fees are not low... From a lumia520 restoring, loading....

= Domestic manufacturers start to do it in order to have a cost-effective from lumia 820

If you look at the domestic business, there are a few who can survive if they are cost-effective.

I don't understand, is it called cost-effective hardware?

Android and Microsoft both have their own characteristics:

There are few applications corresponding to the mobile phone, and the quality of the software is not perfect, the system itself will have some bugs, and the operating system will be a little more complicated than Android. The pros, even low-end phones run smoothly and the operating system is stable.

2.Android, on the other hand, has a large number of applications and the quality of the software is relatively complete. However, the operating system is not as smooth as Windows, as well as the stability.

3.In general, the low-end price point is Windows. Because it is also a low-end machine, Microsoft is better than Android, and there are various jamming phenomena when Android configuration is low.

The prospect is better, after all, the widows system computer is so deeply rooted in the public, and the mobile phone believes that the prospect is also very good.

WP has just entered China, and now is not the time to start, Android has the world's largest market share, of course, it refers to the field of smart phones, which do you think you should start?

The advantage is that the response speed is fast, simple and easy to understand, and it is easy to get started The disadvantage is that the software is not as rich as Android, WP7 does not have a multitasking function, and you can't run multiple programs with colleagues, but it seems that WP8 supports it.

There is no need for a large CPI to be comparable to Android quad-core, and it should be WP with very low hardware requirements!