Smoking or farting in an elevator, which behavior do you find more hateful?

I think the behavior of smoking in the elevator is more hateful, fart sometimes people may have no way to control it, but smoking you can completely control, after all, the elevator is such a sealed, or a public environment, you fully know that smoking is wrong and still smoke in the elevator, that is the quality of the problem.

I think smoking is more hateful. After all, sometimes farting is uncontrollable, and I think the person who farted in the elevator didn't mean it, so he should have tried to endure it as much as possible. Smoking is different, smoking is prohibited in the elevator, and smoking in the elevator will also make others smoke second-hand, which is a manifestation of immorality, so smoking is more hateful.

Although smoking and farting in the elevator are both immoral, smoking is the most hateful, farting is just the smell will make people in the same elevator uncomfortable, but smoking is not only harmful to yourself, the entire elevator people follow you to smoke second-hand smoke, which is harmful to everyone's body.

Compared with farting and smoking in the elevator, I think smoking, I think smoking is more hateful, because farting may be a person, it is not under his control, and he doesn't want to do this, but smokers have no quality, smoking at will in public, and even influencing others in a small environment, this kind of person is very unqualified, and this kind of annoying behavior is even more hateful.

Smoking in the elevator is more hateful than farting, because smoking is an act that you can control, but farting is a physical behavior that you can't control well. Smoking in such a closed public place can have a significant impact on the lives of others.

I think it's smoking, because sometimes I want to fart, and things like burps are things that I can't control, and things that are not within my control can be forgiven. But smoking is a deliberate thing. People who choose to smoke in such a confined space with strangers are at least people who don't care about what others experience and feel.

So I think it's more hateful to smoke in an elevator.

For smoking and farting in the elevator. I found both behaviors disgusted, but I felt like people who smoke in elevators. The most hateful.

Smoking in the elevator can only show that the person has a problem with his quality. Now everywhere you can see signs prohibiting smoking in public places.

The man was still smoking in the elevator. Not only does it make people around you inhale second-hand smoke, but it is more likely to cause fires.

For farting in the elevator. This kind of behavior is excusable, there are too many irresistible factors, if the person is a patient, congenital digestion is not good. It is not allowed by its own conditions.

For most people, in public. Face everyone. Fart is a shameful thing. Presumably, no one would deliberately fart in front of others.

As the saying goes, if you control the heavens and the earth, you can't control other people's xx farts.

Farts are poison in the belly, and there is no reason not to let go.

Both of these behaviors are embarrassing, but smoking is more hateful than that. Fart is sometimes a physical discomfort and uncontrollable behavior, although a little embarrassing and barely understandable, but smoking is an avoidable behavior, and it is immoral to smoke in public to cause second-hand smoke.

It is illegal to smoke in an elevator.

Elevators are obviously public places. The control of smoking in public places follows the principle of co-governance with the society, leading the way, the unit is responsible, the individual is self-disciplined, and the society is supervised. Smoking in places where smoking is prohibited shall be ordered by the administrative law enforcement personnel of the corresponding competent department to make immediate corrections and may be fined not less than 50 yuan but not more than 500 yuan.

No one is allowed to smoke or ask for smoking equipment in places where smoking is prohibited, and consciously obey dissuasion; Smoking in non-smoking places should reasonably avoid non-smokers, do not litter cigarette ashes, and do not litter cigarette butts.

Those who smoke in a business premises where smoking is prohibited and are asked to leave the premises because they do not listen to dissuasion, do not have the right to claim back the fees already consumed from the operators, and those who have already received services but have not paid the fees shall pay the fees.

The legal representative or principal responsible person of a state organ, enterprise, public institution, social group and other social organization is the first person responsible for the unit's smoking control work, and is fully responsible for the unit's smoking control work. The State and society should support efforts to control smoking in public places. Volunteer organizations, other social organizations and individuals are encouraged to participate in or provide support for tobacco control efforts through various forms.

Where individuals discover smoking or other violations of these Regulations in places (areas) where smoking is prohibited, the following measures may be taken:

1. Ask smokers to stop smoking immediately;

2. Require the operator or manager of the place to dissuade him;

3. Report to the supervision and management department the operators or managers who do not perform the duties of smoking control.

Article 10 of the Regulations on the Control of Smoking in Public Places All indoor public places are prohibited from smoking.

Article 11 Smoking is prohibited in the outdoor areas of the following public places:

1) Outdoor areas of childcare establishments, child welfare establishments, schools, activity centers, education and training institutions, and other public places where minors are the main activity population;

2) Outdoor teaching areas of institutions of higher learning;

3) Outdoor areas of maternal and child health care institutions, children's hospitals, and maternity hospitals;

4) Outdoor audience seating and competition area of sports and fitness venues;

5) Outdoor waiting areas for public transport;

6) Other outdoor places where smoking is prohibited as provided for by laws and regulations.

Anyone who violates the law and smokes in a place where smoking is prohibited shall be ordered to make immediate corrections by the administrative law enforcement personnel of the corresponding competent department, and may be fined not less than 50 yuan but not more than 500 yuan. Article 2 of the Regulations on the Control of Smoking in Public Places clearly defines the definition of public places, which refers to places that can be entered, exited or used by the public, places used during work, and public transportation. Elevator is obviously regarded as a legal liability in public places Article 37 Individuals who violate the provisions of these regulations and smoke in places where smoking is prohibited shall be ordered to make immediate corrections by the administrative law enforcement personnel of the corresponding competent authorities, and may be fined not less than 50 yuan but not more than 500 yuan.

The above is only the current information combined with my understanding of the law, please refer to it carefully!

If you still have questions about this issue, it is recommended that you organize the relevant information and communicate with a professional in detail.

Legal analysis: If the law is violated, the administrative law enforcement personnel of the corresponding competent department will order immediate correction, and a fine of not less than 50 yuan but not more than 500 yuan can be imposed.

Legal basis: Regulations on the Control of Smoking in Public Places

Article 37 Where an individual violates the provisions of these Regulations by smoking in a place where smoking is prohibited, the administrative law enforcement personnel of the corresponding competent department shall order him to make corrections immediately, and may impose a fine of not less than 50 yuan but not more than 500 yuan for travel.

Article 38: Where units or institutions violate the provisions of these Regulations by failing to implement a complete smoking ban or failing to set up smoking points in accordance with regulations, the corresponding competent departments shall order corrections to be made within a set period of time and may impose a fine of between 1,000 and 10,000 RMB; and where corrections are refused, a fine of between 10,000 and 30,000 RMB is to be given.

The law prohibits smoking in the office because the office is a public place, according to Article 18 of the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Regulations on the Administration of Hygiene in Public Places of the Ministry of Health

1. Smoking is prohibited in indoor public places.

2. Operators of public places shall set up conspicuous warnings and signs prohibiting smoking.

3. Smoking areas set up in outdoor public places shall not be located on the passages that pedestrians must pass.

4. Cigarette vending machines shall not be set up in public places.

5. Operators of public places shall carry out publicity on the health hazards of smoking, and assign full-time (part-time) personnel to dissuade smokers.

Article 2 of the Regulations on the Control of Smoking in Public Places clearly defines public places as places where the public can enter, exit or use, places used during work, and public transportation. Elevator is obviously regarded as a public place legal responsibility Article 37 individuals in violation of the provisions of these regulations, smoking in a place where smoking is prohibited, by the corresponding competent administrative law enforcement personnel ordered to immediately correct, Changhe and may be fined more than 50 yuan and less than 500 yuan.

[Legal Analysis].Article 2 of the Regulations on the Control of Smoking in Public Places clearly defines the definition of public places, which refers to places that can be entered, exited or used by the public, places used during work, and public transportation. Elevators are obviously considered public places.

[Legal basis].Smoking Control in Public Places

Article 37: Where an individual violates the provisions of these Regulations by smoking in a place where smoking is prohibited, the administrative law enforcement personnel of the corresponding competent department shall order him to make corrections immediately and may impose a fine of not less than 50 yuan but not more than 500 yuan.

Article 38: Where a unit or institution violates the provisions of these Regulations by failing to implement a comprehensive ban on smoking or failing to set up smoking points in accordance with the provisions, the corresponding competent department shall order it to make corrections within a set period of time and may impose a fine of between 1,000 and 10,000 RMB; and where corrections are refused, a fine of between 10,000 and 30,000 RMB is to be imposed.

China has a huge number of smokers, there are not a few people who smoke, and I will meet people who smoke in the elevator in life, I myself have pharyngitis, and second-hand smoke in a confined space will produce a strong sense of discomfort.

But looking back on my own experience, before I had children, I was reluctant to directly discourage others from smoking in the elevator, and I am a person who avoids conflict, and often prefer to be patient myself rather than create conflict (I still don't know enough about this matter now).

When you encounter a smoker in the elevator, are you willing to be brave enough to stop it?

When I learned about a case in Zhengzhou in 2017, it gave me a lot of courage, and yes, it seems that we need a little courage to make even a small change.

In 2017, there was a case in a community in Zhengzhou that discouraged smoking, and finally one of the parties died.

Here's the thing, the parties Yang and Duan entered the elevator successively, Duan was smoking in the elevator, and Yang dissuaded him. In the process of persuasion, the two did not have a verbal conflict, and after being dissuaded by the property personnel, Yang left, and Duan followed the property personnel into the property office, and Duan unfortunately died suddenly.

Duan's wife sued Yang in court, and the court ruled in the first instance that Yang should pay RMB 10,000 yuan, and Duan's wife, Tian, was dissatisfied and sued to the Zhengzhou Intermediate People's Court. As a result, Tian not only did not realize the original litigation claim, but also did not even get the compensation of 10,000 yuan, how is this considered?

The translation is: Yang's dissuasive behavior is reasonable and legal, and he should not be liable for compensation.

Imagine if according to the judgment of the first instance, if I encountered a smoker in the elevator again, would I hesitate before trying to stop it? (Is this person healthy, if I persuade him, something happens to him later, do I want to compensate, although 10,000 yuan is not a huge amount of compensation, but I don't want to cause a lawsuit) hesitated and hesitated in the end, it is likely that it will no longer be stopped.

The little courage that this incident gave me to stand up was that there were no seemingly compromise verdicts in the verdict because of Duan's misfortune (which is certainly worthy of sympathy). The unfortunate deserve sympathy, but those who do what is reasonable and legitimate should also be protected by the law.