-
Note that the upstairs is the maximum, why, the Cauchy inequality can be proved:
By Cauchy's inequality:
x+y<= (1 1+1 2)* x+y)=(2)* x+y) so it should be:
x+√y)/√(x+y)<=(√2)*√x+y)/√(x+y)=√2
2 is the maximum.
The minimum value should be taken when x=0, y=1 is alive x=1, y=0, the minimum value is 1 can be simply understood in this way, when finding the maximum value, the equal sign is established when the condition is x=y, that is, x, y is the closest to take the maximum value, of course, its opposite is that the greater the difference between x and y, the smaller its value, obviously, if x is infinite, y tends to 0 when the minimum is the same: this is equivalent to finding the limit:
lim(√x+√y)/√(x+y)=lim√x/√x=1。
The minimum value is 1, but this minimum value cannot be taken because of x,y r+,.
-
(x)+ y)] 2 [ (x+y)] 2x+y+2 (xy) x+y, first find the minimum value x+y+2 (xy) x+y] 1 2 (xy) x+yx+y, greater than or equal to 2 xy, the basic inequality.
Therefore, the minimum value of [ (x)+ y)] 2 [ (x+y)] 2 is 2 (x)+ y)] and the minimum value of [ (x+y)] is 2
-
【√(x)+√y)】/【√(x+y)】)2=(x+y+2√xy)\(x+y)
Because x+y 2 (x+y).
So (x+y+2 xy) (x+y) 4 xy 2 xy=2, so the original formula [ (x)+y)] [ (x+y)] 2 so the minimum value is 2
-
The minimum real number m=27, so that a=b=c=1 3 is obtained, m>=27, and when m=27, we prove, 27(a 3+b 3+c 3)>=6(a 2+b 2+c 2)+1 (1).
3(a^3+b^3+c^3)-(a^2+b^2+c^2)=3(a^3+b^3+c^3)-(a^2+b^2+c^2)(a+b+c)=
a+b)(a-b)^2+(b+c)(b-c)^2+(c+a)(c-a)^2>=0
and 3(a 2 + b 2 + c 2)-1=3(a 2 + b 2 + c 2) - (a + b + c) 2 = (a - b) 2 + (b -c) 2 + (c -a) 2 > = 0
So 9(a 3 + b 3 + c 3) > = 3 (a 2 + b 2 + c 2) > = 1
Proof (1) is sufficient.
-
Proof: From the fundamental inequality, it can be seen that when x,y 0, x +y 2xy===>2(x²+y²)≥x+y)².
=>√[2(x²+y²)]x+y.Therefore, it can be seen from the inscription, [2(a +b )]a+b.√[2(b²+c²)]b+c,√[2(c²+a²)]c+a.
The addition of the three formulas yields (2)[ a +b )+b +c )+c +a )]2(a+b+c)===>√(a²+b²)+b²+c²)+c²+a²)≥2)(a+b+c).
-
Do it with the basic properties of inequality.
Under the root a 2+b 2>=(a+b)*(a+b) 2 under the root (a 2+b 2)>=(a+b)*under the root (1 2) under the root (a*a+c*c)>=(a+c)*under the root (1 2) under the root (c*c+b*b)>=(c+b)*under the root (1 2) add the above three formulas.
A 2+B 2 + B 2+C 2+C 2+C 2 + C 2+A 2 under the root number> = 2 * (A + B + C).
-
f(x) = ln(1+x) -mx
f'(x) = 1/(1+x) -m
f'(1) =0
m = 1/2
f''(x) = - 1/(1+x)^2 < 0 ( for x≠ -1 )
f(x) is defined for x > 1f(x).
Increase (-1, 1 2).
Decrease (1 2,
a^2b+b^2c
a*ab+b*bc) >>>More
Fractional inequalities are reduced to integer inequalities and solved. The solution of a fractional inequality is as follows: the first step is to remove the denominator, the second step is to remove the parentheses, the third step is to move the terms, the fourth step is to merge the same terms, and the fifth step is to reduce the coefficient of the unknown to 1. >>>More
。Because |x2-4|Definitely greater than or equal to 0 |x2-4|<1 So|x2-4|It must be a positive decimal or 0, so x2-4 is less than or equal to 1 or x2-4 is equal to 0, and we get that x2 is less than or equal to 5, x is less than or equal to the root number 5, or x is equal to plus or minus 2, and bring in |x-2|It follows that a is greater than or equal to the root number 5-2 or a is equal to 4 or 0 and 4 is included in the root number 5-2. >>>More
Let's say there are x boxes, y parts.
Get the inequality. >>>More
Because a + b a+b
So a + b [a+b (a + b)]a+b [a+b (a + b)]. >>>More