What is humane destruction ? 40

Humane destruction (animal euthanasia) is the "artificial end" of animal life with the lowest degree of suffering, "euthanasia" is derived from the Greek, has the meaning of "good death" or "bitter death", so it is also translated as animal euthanasia. The causes of humane destruction are generally disease, rabies, oversupply in the market, eugenics, etc. For reasons of moral respect, humanely destroyed animal bodies are never used for the purpose of food, otherwise such acts are called "slaughtering" or "slaughtering", such as slaughtering pigs, cows, and chickens [1].

In the commercialized human society, humane destruction is the end of many abandoned pet cats and dogs. In the pet store commodity chain, pets are mass-produced for pet breeding farms. When the market is oversupplied, the surplus of pets will be humanely destroyed in the breeding farm to save production costs and adjust the amount and market price.

Humane destruction is a matter of religious, moral and ethical controversy. Some cases are publicized by the media, which is likely to cause social controversy and political problems.

Something is disposed of, and a good reason is given that it can't be regenerated.

If no one wants animals, they're going to be destroyed humanely, as you said.

But this kind of thing only happens outside Hong Kong. Because they can't hurt the animals on their side.

In China, it is enough to have chengguan, and the concept of humane destruction is not high in China.

After you complete the task, you will be a useless person in the eyes of others, which is called humane destruction.

Humanitarian destruction, such as euthanasia.

Humanity, as the name suggests, the morality of man, the destruction of obeying the morality of man. Human morality is compassion and not suffering.

It can be understood like this: Although this guy has done all kinds of evil, he has done a lot of disgusting and disgusting things that should have been cut with a thousand cuts. But we must insist on humanitarianism, and it is too cruel to punish him, and although he is bad, we must not lose our minds and do similar things. It's good to shoot it all in one shot.

Loss of sexual function. It can be understood as becoming a eunuch

The correct concept of humanitarianism:

In June 2001, in his book "On the New Era", Xie Zhouyong, a great contemporary Chinese thinker, put forward the concept of social humanitarianism for the first time in the world, founded the great theory of social humanism, and advanced humanism to the stage of social humanitarianism, which truly explained humanitarianism scientifically and laid a truly scientific cornerstone for the sociological theory of all mankind.

Xie Zhouyong believes that since each of us is a single individual, we must recognize the value of each person, that is, we must recognize the personality of each person. However, each of us is a member of society, so we must also recognize the social nature of human beings.

Therefore, the natural law of survival and development that is unique to us human beings, that is, social humanity, contains two basic contents, that is, while recognizing the importance of human personality, recognizing the social nature of human beings. In other words, in order to survive and develop as human beings, we must recognize the importance of human personality as well as the social nature of human beings. Therefore, what authoritative scholars call "humanism and anti-humanism" -- in fact, they break the two aspects of the development law of human existence and one-sidedly emphasize the importance of personality, ignoring the common ecological balance of all mankind that is required to be guaranteed by human sociality, which is the natural and complete content of the law of survival and development unique to our human beings, thus leading to non-social and humane activities.

Therefore, the authoritative scholars who engage in "anti-humanism" and "humanism and anti-humanism" are even more ridiculous than those who are "humanitarian". Because the latter is only two aspects of the law of development that is unique to human beings.

Xie Zhouyong pointed out that only under the premise of social humanity can human beings stipulate the production relations and superstructure that are suitable for the development of their own productive forces. It is the relationship between the productive forces and social humanity that constitutes everything inherent in human beings themselves, and which goes directly into the history of our humanity; Rather than the relationship between the productive forces and the relations of production, it goes directly into the history of our humanity.

The latter merely shows that the basic principles of its existence are derived from what actually exists, but not from everything inherent in human beings, i.e., from the connection of the original reality, and therefore it indicates only empirical knowledge about the world and what happens in it, and what is produced from it is by no means philosophy, but only empirical science. However, in this way, the worldview of mankind has truly opened up.

Therefore, the correct definition of humanitarianism should be social humanitarianism.

Xie Zhouyong advanced the Western humanitarian trend of thought, as well as various religions and schools of thought in ancient and modern times around the world, to the stage of scientific social humanism, made great contributions to the people of the world, became a thinker who influenced the world, and marked that China has once again become the center of world thought, which is also the pride of the Chinese.

Only by understanding the correct concept of humanitarianism can humanity truly emancipate itself.

Humanitarianism is positive energy, and only hypocrisy can mislead the progress of human thought.

I have heard and witnessed the speeches of some minions to their masters. The thrust of their speeches, stripped of the flowery rhetoric, is nothing more than to say, please let me kneel and lick you, you are the most famous one in my list of kneeling and licking masters. And I also promise that when facing the reprimands of your masters, I promise not to fight back and not to fight back, which is my basic principle.

However, for the sake of other masters, please look at the face of the Buddha instead of the monk's face.

On a macro level, although some works have the power of contemporary criticism, the value of art itself is the rise of ordinary people's behavior. The meaning of its existence is small and helpless compared to the technocracy that leads the progress of the times. To use an analogy:

Class is dark, many people know this. It's like people living in the dark. If there was no art, it would be like this, the slave owners arranged for the slaves to be suppressed by force to work for them, and the slaves did not see the light and sometimes rebelled violently against the slave owners.

Art is the equivalent of a candle in this dark world, the higher the grade, the bigger and brighter it appears. In other words, art cannot promote the progress of people's ideological civilization, but it can make slaves feel as if they can see the light after removing this dark curtain in the tired labor, and make people feel physically and mentally happy. That's where art comes in.

As for technocracy?

Technocracy can make people no longer worship the royal family and bureaucratic aristocracy, and contribute to the progress of civilization. Ponies have struggled with technocracy all their lives, but technocracy is not hedonistic and self-indulgent, so they have always been ahead of the curve. Moreover, historical facts have long proved that since the emergence of technocracy, all those who oppose them, whether the sun never sets or the Yamato nation, have paid a heavy price.

The sun never sets is the embryonic place of technocracy, hoping to conquer all areas of bureaucracy, and as a result, a naval battle will be lost miserably to the Yamato people, who have a higher technocracy. The Yamato nation was also carried away and suffered a miserable defeat at the hands of the expelled Jews.

This is because at all times, technocracy will always have to take over all the big slave owners or royal nobles in order to protect their own lives. In other words, if the Third World Congress is convened, there will inevitably be a more powerful ** than the atomic bomb.

This is invincible technocracy. As long as there are classes on the earth, they will always do things that harm the earth's environment and make the royal family, the big slave owner group, kneel and lick.