Huawei P8 graphics card comparison with Tegrak1

You must know that Huawei's own Kirin CPU uses Arm's 10,000-year-old Mali GPU, and the performance has not been good.

Kirin 935, 4 A53E A53, ArmV8 architecture, GPU Mali-T628 MP4, 600MHz,. This GPU is about the same as Qualcomm's Adreno 320 (96ALU), APQ8064AB, 450 MHz, and K1 is more powerful than 810's A430, A430, 500-600MHz, containing 288 ALUs, which is 3 times that of A320, see the figure at the bottom.

Tegra K1 4 Cortex A15 cores, the highest frequency, GPU part Tegra K1 is the first to carry a more advanced Kepler architecture, and 192 CUDA cores (stream processors), support Direct 11, means that the graphics processor of this processor has reached the desktop processor level. The Snapdragon 810 comes with an Adreno 430 GPU with 288 built-in render cores. Although there are more than the Tegra X1, the main frequency is only 600MHz, while the Tegra X1 GPU can reach 1GHz, so the graphics performance is also better than that of the Snapdragon 810.

In terms of performance, NVIDIA says it is capable of more than three times the performance of the Apple A7 in GFXBENCH. Subsequently, foreign media notebookcheck managed to get a tablet prototype equipped with Tegre K1 processor and did a GFXBENCH (T-Rex offscreen) performance comparison test. In this test, the Tegra K1 ran a score of 60FPS, which is almost four times that of the previous generation Tegra4, more than twice that of the Snapdragon 800 and Apple A7, and even surpasses the X86 architecture HD Graphics 4400, second only to the mobile GPU GT 740M.

The Tegra K1 shows graphics performance that is close to that of a desktop processor. In the GFXBont test, the Tegra K1 only lost out to its own GeForce GT740M graphics card, which scored nearly twice as much. The HD Graphics 4400 graphics card used by Intel's Haswell chip is in third place by a narrow margin, and other products, including desktop graphics, are significantly behind Tegra K1.

It's pretty tough for a tablet, with a high configuration of multi-core and 3D-heavy capabilities! It's equivalent to the entry level of GPU!

Tegra is similar to AMD's APU processor, and the theoretical GPU performance of Tegra K1 should be similar to that of GT630 D3 of desktop graphics cards.

Depending on what voltage it is, the K1 overclocking can surpass some desktop-level processors when the same desktop-level high voltage is high, but such a small power in the mobile phone is definitely impossible.

Are you kidding? Does the GPU performance on a mobile phone compare to the GPU performance of a graphics card on a computer? Even the worst GPU on a computer today is many times better than the performance of a mobile GPU.

It has to be K1, the architecture is different, the latter uses the same Kepler architecture as the desktop PC, with 192 stream processor units, and the performance is half of the 2012 NVIDIA GT640 desktop version (DDR3 video memory version)! Throw tegra 4 a few streets. It is stronger than the previous generation Apple A7 and Snapdragon 801, but the power consumption is also high (:

GPU model CPU model GPU clock speed Floating-point arithmetic (bigger is better).

The Xiaomi tablet uses a 32-bit K1, while the Google Nexus9 uses a 64-bit one! (Google was immediately optimized for 64-bit).

K1 has good performance, but it can't be used in mobile phones if the heat dissipation and power consumption problem is not solved.

K1 is good, Tegra4 is mainly used for mobile phones, and K1 is used for tablets.

To tell you the truth, this SOC has extremely high heat generation and very power-hungry performance You can roughly understand that it is tied with Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 GPU is also similar to that of desktops The test data given by Nvidia is close to Intel Celeron 2955U to be verified.

Tegra K1's performance is really strong, but the power consumption and baseband can't be controlled, so it's basically disappeared on the mobile phone platform, and it's basically a tablet in terms of performance, and it's the only processor in Android that can be comparable to Apple's.

Now it's not good, it was defeated by Apple's tablet cpua8x, which was more god back then, and now it has been taken over by Tegrax1.

It's the best hair, has the Snapdragon 810 heating problem been solved, what about the strong performance, and you are willing to touch it when you are hot like that? The M9 is still hotter with a metal body.

The performance of Tegra K1 can be compared with Snapdragon 810, but it also has high power consumption, so it is only used in the tablet field.

You didn't say that the specific models of HiSilicon processors can't be compared, but HiSilicon has been optimizing for power consumption and heating since Kirin, so the GPU performance will inevitably not be very strong.

The Snapdragon 805 is not top-of-the-line compared to the K1 and Snapdragon 810, but it is better than all HiSilicon models.

Of course, Qualcomm 810 is the best, there is a big difference.

GPU performance should be slightly better than K1.

But SoC, you also have to look at the power consumption.

Lao Huang is keen on the manufacture of tactical-grade nuclear bombs!

The K1 has a 32-bit version and a 64-bit version, but no matter which version it is, the actual experience of the NVIDIA Tegra K1 is absolutely instantaneous MTK8752(TM).