Ladies of you who are studying law, I want to ask for help!!!!!

Article 83 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that: "The adjacent parties to the immovable property shall, in accordance with the spirit of conducive to production, convenient life, solidarity and mutual assistance, fairness and reasonableness, correctly handle the adjacent relationship in terms of water interception, drainage, passage, ventilation and lighting." Where obstructions or losses are caused to neighboring parties, the infringement shall be stopped, the obstruction removed, and the losses compensated.

Article 124 stipulates: "Whoever violates the state's provisions on environmental protection and prevention of pollution and pollutes the environment and causes damage to others shall bear civil liability in accordance with law." "Noise pollution is a type of environmental pollution, and the relationship between the small bathhouse and your home is one of neighborhoods.

Therefore, the behavior of the small bathhouse violates the principle that the neighbor relationship should follow, causes noise pollution, and affects the normal life of the neighbors, which is a tort and should bear civil liability in accordance with the law. Article 134 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates: "The main ways to bear civil liability are:

a) Cease the violation; (ii) removal of obstacles; (iii) Elimination of hazards; (iv) Return of property; (v) restitution; (6) repair, rework and replacement; (vii) Compensation for losses; (8) Pay liquidated damages; (ix) Elimination of influence and restoration of reputation; (10) Apologize. The above methods of bearing civil liability may be applied separately or in combination. In addition to applying the above provisions, people's courts hearing civil cases may also give reprimands, order them to make a statement of repentance, confiscate property and illegal gains from illegal activities, and may impose fines or detention in accordance with the provisions of law.

Therefore, you can negotiate with the small bathhouse to settle the matter accordingly, if not, you can ask the relevant departments to mediate, or you can directly sue the people's court for litigation.

Mediation first, if mediation fails, infringement can be sued.

This is a tort under the newly promulgated tort law, which violates your right to a peaceful life, you can negotiate with them first, and if it fails, you can only sue in court and ask them to stop the infringement.

Violation of neighbouring rights. Video, find a witness, and then negotiate with the boiler room first. If you can't solve it, go to court to sue.

First question:

1. There is something wrong. The mortgage contract signed by the parties did not take effect.

2. The bank's mortgage cannot be realized.

3. The factory building is immovable property, and the mortgage of the immovable property must be registered. In this case, the mortgage contract between the parties was established, but it did not take effect without registration. Only after registration can the bank realize the mortgage.

Second question:

1. It can be resold, Lin has notified Sun before the transfer, and Sun has not indicated that he wants to buy, and the transfer is valid.

2. The effect is to be determined, and the consent of the owner of the house must be obtained for subleasing the house as a tenant. If the owner of the house subsub-acknowledges the sublease sub-contract, the sublease is valid, and if the owner of the house does not sub-recognise the sub-lease, the sub-lease is invalid.

3. Have the right to require Sun to bear the liability for breach of contract. Mr. Zhao is now the owner of the house, and Mr. Zhao has inherited the rights and obligations of the lease contract between Mr. Lin and Mr. Sun.

Are you talking about the division of responsibility for traffic accidents? Isn't there a determination of the responsibility of the traffic police? If it is really to avoid the wrong vehicle and avoid danger and kill C, it should be said that B is fully responsible. The deceased is a death compensation, and the family of the deceased can claim spiritual consolation.

Is it to avoid a wrong-way vehicle? If C is hit in order to avoid a vehicle driving in the wrong direction, A's behavior is an emergency avoidance, and A has no criminal liability, and the civil liability for compensation should be borne by vehicle B that caused the danger.

Is there no traffic accident liability certificate? Looking at the responsibility of the three parties to the accident, A and B must be responsible, but C is not necessarily not responsible.

The compensation includes moral compensation and death compensation, and there is a problem with this, we should try to increase the death compensation within the amount of compensation paid by the insurance company, because the insurance company does not pay moral compensation.

Because B had a traffic accident at work, B's workplace was also liable for compensation.

1. A was responsible for avoiding parking in the same direction and driving on the road and killing C. B stops on the opposite road, objectively causing a traffic accident, and is also responsible. C's position is in ** you have not introduced, if C is on a zebra crossing, C is not responsible; C is also liable if he is not on a zebra crossing and is walking on a motorised road.

2. Compensation for traffic accidents is based on the responsibility for the accident and the age of the victim.

3. C is 54 years old, and the funeral expenses are 6 months of the average monthly salary of the local people; The death benefit is 20 years of the local resident's disposable income.

4. The settlement of the accident shall mainly follow the negotiation between the party responsible for the accident and the family of the recipient, and the traffic accident handling department shall rule if the negotiation fails.