Robbing the yellow lantern, the public said that the public was reasonable, and the mother said that

From the current point of view, the Ministry of Public Security is also right, the implementation has been suspended for two days, it is really like a wall grass, if you want to enforce it, you will continue to enforce it, and if you don't implement it, find another way.

At present, experts also dispute this, mainly the role of yellow lights, which is still being debated.

Some experts believe that the yellow light does not mean to prohibit driving, nor does it mean to clean up the road, but only a warning to slow down.

And many people think that yellow light means to clean the road.

From this point of view, what exactly does the yellow light mean has become the core issue of whether this provision of the Ministry of Public Security is reasonably enforced.

According to the three lights in our country, the red light stops, the green light goes, and the yellow light should be noted. So what exactly does this sentence mean, it seems that there is no clear explanation in the law.

This may also be because our country's economy was not very good before, there were very few cars, and there were few cars on the road, and the leaders simply dealt with this matter, which is equivalent to making laws for the space shuttle now, but now it is different, and it needs to be explained in detail.

We assume that an intersection without a turntable uses three-color lights to direct traffic, and the most direct and simple way is to open traffic to the north and south first, and then open to traffic from north to west, and then open to traffic from north to south, so as to avoid chaotic collision of vehicles.

In order to improve the efficiency of traffic, the better the connection, the higher the efficiency.

On the whole, the lighting time of yellow light and green light in China is equal to the light time of red light, that is to say, whether it is a yellow light or a green light in one direction, the other intersection is a red light.

In the process of turning green to red, I was worried that the car would not be able to brake, so I used a yellow light as a buffer.

Then the role of the yellow light is to tell you that this light is about to turn red, and the other road will be green immediately, pay attention to safety measures.

From this point of view, when the yellow light is on, it should be stopped, and it is necessary to accelerate through the intersection if it cannot be stopped. Instead of slowing down as the experts say, imagine that the drivers on the other road are all on the accelerator and ready to sprint, are you still driving slowly and leisurely at the intersection.

Therefore, the role of the yellow light is to clean up the remaining problems of the green light and make full preparations for the green light at another intersection.

So the experts of the Ministry of Transportation are wise, but there is a certain difficulty in the operation of this braking distance. Judging whether to run a yellow light with a line is a bit too theoretical, and it may just be a product of homework books or high technology, and it is difficult for civilians to do it.

The penalty for running a red light is not as troublesome as a yellow light because there is a yellow light warning before the red light, so the red light penalty is relatively easy to point, and the basic nature of the line is determined.

It shows that people's cognition is affected by the main factor. Such as people's knowledge level, thinking structure, interest position, etc.

The purpose of the yellow light is to warn the driver to be ready to stop.

The public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable. This sentence is an old Chinese saying, what does it describe? The description is a quarrel between lovers, and each party feels that they are justified and feels that they are right, but when an outsider hears it, it does make sense, so what is the problem and what should be done.

First of all, the protagonists of this sentence are two people, one is a public and the other is a mother-in-law, these are different people, since they are different people, so the angle and aspect of thinking are inconsistent, and everyone expounds their own views, to justify, and cover the face with points, so there will be such a situation. For example, scenario 1: Your girlfriend complains to you that he is criticized for not doing enough work at the company, and the man says to eat first because he doesn't know anything about his job and because it's time to eat.

Is there anything wrong with the man's words, yes and no. The woman's current problem is that she is lost and unhappy because of her work, and the man's answer is not what she asked, and it is insignificant, so the woman will be even more angry.

Solution: Communicate with the woman about the problems encountered by the woman, and at the same time express some encouragement and approval for her work.

Scenario 2: How to praise your girlfriend, if you say something, it is like water without roots and a tree without roots. Some words seem to be high, but in fact they are official words and clichés, the communication between people needs to be sincere, sometimes the words do not need too much, sometimes one or two sentences can move people's hearts, so praise people need to be based on some actual situations, such as which point of the other party is very good, there is a basis, in order to make the other party satisfied.

People must learn to empathize, everyone encounters a different situation, the way of thinking is also different, can not rest on their laurels, just limited to their own thoughts, and finally just sit in the sky, a leaf blind.

各执字 [gèzhíyī

cí] each man holds on to his own filial piety. Inconsistent views on descriptions.

On this matter, the two sides insisted on their own opinions, and they were never able to unify everyone's opinions.

Chinese name. Differing opinions.

Spelling hand sounds. gèzhíyī

Cí explained. Each man insists on his own account.

Grammar. moving-object; as a predicate.

Interpretation. Persistence: Persistence. Each man insists on his own account.

Example. At the debate, the two sides were at loggerheads. Cave cheat draft.

On this matter, the two sides insisted on their own opinions, and they were never able to unify everyone's opinions.

各执字 [gè zhí yī cí].

Each man insists on his own account. Inconsistent views on descriptions.

On this matter, the two sides insisted on their own opinions, and they were never able to unify everyone's opinions.

Chinese names have different names.

Pinyin: gè zhí yī cí

Explain that each person insists on his own account.

grammatical verb-object; as a predicate.

Explanation: Persistence. Each man insists on his own account.

Example: In a debate, the two sides are at loggerheads.

On this matter, the two sides insisted on their own opinions, and they were never able to unify everyone's opinions.

The answer is: Toutou is the Tao.

The in-laws are two heads, that is, the head head.

Reason is the truth, that is, the way.

So the answer is, the head is the way.

The public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable (playing an idiom).

The answer: each has its own opinion.

The public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother says that the mother is reasonable, and the explanation metaphor A says that A is right, B says that B is right, and each insists on one word.

Word decomposition Explanation of Reason, reasonable, favorable, and modest, including only addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and exhaustive multiples; It does not contain an inexhaustible sum + is rational and the detailed explanation makes sense. "Five Lantern Huiyuan, Kai Funing Zen Master, Dharma Heir, Dazhong Yin Chi Wei, Shanguo Zen Master": "There is reason not to sell Li Sheng.

Dream of Red Mansions" Chapter 119: "See you."