Why some Chinese now generally lack original creative WPS

There is no shortage of innovative thinking, but there are no conditions for practice.

A high school student in the United States made a storage at home because he thought that the iPad storage was too small, and then uploaded it for everyone for free, and it didn't take long for hundreds of thousands of students to share it on this. When he was 21 years old, he sold it to an American Internet company for $200 million. In China, such miracles can happen, but in the end, the child didn't make any money, and you said that he didn't have the ability to innovate.

First of all, Chinese high school students don't know how to do it at all, and they can't pass the English level, and secondly, the successful ** are the introduction of advanced mature types from abroad**, such as baidu and sina Weibo, and there is no way to have a loophole.

To put it simply, we think of innovation as changing something old. However, China's old things are changed by introducing new things from foreign countries, and it is difficult to change some things unless it takes its own direction.

Or the United States, a 22-year-old genius scientist, spent 15 days building his own miniature nuclear reactor. But the raw materials he uses are very expensive, even Chinese university professors have never used them, because they are too expensive. Harvard University spends $4 billion a year, while China spends $30 billion a year on compulsory education.

The problem is that Harvard has only 6,600 students.

Money Force morality has long been more important.

All of China's current systems are making creative thinking people miserable.

If China does not have creative thinking, how can there be the "Four Great Inventions" of ancient China? How can there be two Nobel Prizes in modern China (Tu Youyou and Mo Yan)?

Chinese people should have cultural self-confidence and not listen to the arrogant and nonsense of individual scholars.

Scientific and institutional creativity has nothing to do with the ability to think critically and logically.

Aggressive and aggressive, Chinese culture is a tolerant culture, which can assimilate foreign cultures, but it is not aggressive.

No, a few more things, a few less. If there is more, there will be no more to say, what is missing, less freedom of thought, less cultural freedom, less academic freedom. It's not scientific, so it's not much progress.

Less is formed on the basis of more. Because of the net, I can only give you a general description.

Because since the end of the Warring States period, Han Confucianism has become orthodox.

No, it's just that you don't see its gold content in the eyes of Americans.

Blind optimism and self-confidence in national development, blind xenophobia, opposition to world equality (against world homogeneity), and a desire to solve the problem of the international situation through anti-peace and unjust means, and then lack of humanity and moral degradation.

It should be the result of many years of exam-oriented education, resulting in relatively solidified thinking and weak judgment and action. I hope that everyone will work together to reform the education and create a better humanistic ......environment for future generations

What is the basis for your proposal? There are people in China who lack rational thinking, but I have not heard of such a statement that Chinese lack rational thinking.

Reason? Chinese have never lacked rational thinking, but some original and innovative thinking.

It's not a lack of it, it's a different way of thinking and focus.

It can't be generalized, it can only be said that some people are easy to be emotional.