Can primitive communes go straight into feudal society?

Yes, there are primitive societies and excessively feudal societies that are related to the national conditions of various countries. He Ru Shangyue believes that after the establishment of the Later Jin regime, the clan society directly entered the feudal society. Some backward peoples in Western Europe did not go through the stage of slavery and went directly from primitive communes to feudal society.

North America was originally composed of some indigenous Indians, in a primitive society, and later the West invaded, and the United States transitioned to a capitalist society. Some ethnic minorities in China have a primitive society that directly transitions to a feudal society and a socialist society, such as the Dulong and Oroqen ethnic groups.

A typical example of a direct transition from a primitive commune to a feudal society: the establishment of feudalism in Western Europe, from which the Germanic peoples went directly from primitive society to feudal society.

It is generally believed that Europe's entry into feudal society (the Middle Ages) was achieved through two ways: first, the Eastern Roman Empire in Eastern Europe, that is, the Byzantine Empire, transitioned from a slave society to a feudal society through peaceful means; The other is that after the Germanic people destroyed the Western Roman Empire by force, the original industry, commerce and handicrafts of the Western Roman Empire declined, the original slave mode of production collapsed, and the economy based on agricultural production from the Germanic people became the main body of social economy, and the Germanic people absorbed some of the ideas of the Romans and established a mode of production that was different from the primitive commune era in the past and different from the Roman period, that is, the feudal manor economic model. The establishment of this model determined the establishment of the mode of production in Western Europe in feudal society.

Yes, with the help of external forces. For example, when China was liberated, many ethnic minorities crossed the feudal society and directly entered socialism.

There seems to be no record of this, but I do know that the primitive commune could go directly to socialism.

The primitive commune was the first social form in human history, based on the primitive commune ownership of the means of production, under which people mainly used stone tools and wooden tools to gather natural food and fish and hunt for a living. The productive forces were extremely low, and they had to rely on collective labour for a limited means of subsistence, which were distributed equally among the members of the commune. There is no surplus, there is no exploitation, there is no class.

A society in which man exploited man after the collapse of primitive society. It is mainly characterized by the possession of the slave by the slave owner and the practice of supra-economic slavery. A system in which slave owners own slaves.

Labour activities must be predominantly slave-based, unpaid, and without personal freedom. In a human society, if most of the laborers in the field of material production are slaves, such a society is called a slave society.

In primitive society, people had equal status, and in slave society, there were ranks, namely nobles, commoners, and slaves.

Slave societies had armies, penal codes, prisons, castles and palaces. Primitive societies did not.

In the clan commune, the primitive commune system based on public ownership gradually disintegrated after the emergence of private ownership, the differentiation between the rich and the poor, and the hierarchical differential. The primitive commune system was replaced by the first system of exploiting man, slave ownership. The historical development of Longshan culture in various regions is uneven, with some areas developing relatively fast and others developing relatively slowly.

Therefore, the time of the end of Longshan culture in various places has come first and later. The Longshan culture in Henan developed the fastest, and about 2,000 years BC, the primitive commune system disintegrated and entered the slave society of the Xia Dynasty. The Longshan culture in Shaanxi ended relatively late, and it was not until more than 1,000 BC that it gave way to the slave society of the Western Zhou Dynasty.

Essential difference: the economic base determines the superstructure.

Primitive society is the first stage of the development of human society, and the level of human productive forces in primitive society is very low, and the means of production are all publicly owned. With the increase in the level of productive forces, after the emergence of a surplus of products, there was a differentiation between the rich and the poor and private ownership, and the original relations of common distribution and common labor were destroyed and replaced by class society. When society develops to a certain stage, the productive forces are highly developed, and the people's living standards are very rich, and at this time, people's consciousness is very high, and public ownership appears.

In short, public ownership in primitive societies is due to backward productive forces, while socialism is due to highly developed productive forces. It says so, and whether you believe it or not is another matter.