The aunt tripped over a suitcase at the station and died, does its owner need to be held responsible

The old man tripped over the suitcase at the entrance of the Beijing Railway Station, resulting in a cerebral hemorrhage, and finally died after the rescue failed, the family of the deceased sued the owner of the suitcase in court, and claimed 620,000 yuan, the case has not yet been pronounced, whether the owner of the suitcase is liable has not yet been decided, the following is my personal opinion.

It can be seen from the monitoring** that the incident was completely accidental, and the main reason was the deceased himself. It can be seen from the monitoring ** that there were not many people at the entrance of the station at that time, and the road next to it was still very spacious, and the reason why the old man tripped and fell on the suitcase was entirely because of his own carelessness, and it did not have much to do with the owner who pulled the suitcase. The train station is a place where people gather, and most people will carry large and small luggage, walking in a public place such as the train station should be extra careful, I don't agree with the accusations of the deceased's family on the owner of the suitcase, if this is responsible, then everyone has to worry about whether it will be loaded by others at any time, and then ask for compensation.

The responsibility of the son of the deceased is greater than that of the owner of the suitcase. The reason why the deceased tripped over the suitcase occurred when the deceased's son took the deceased to the wrong entrance and exited the station, and the deceased's son did not take good care of his mother during the whole process, and after the deceased fell, the deceased's son did not take the deceased to the hospital to determine the injury, but continued to ride.

I am deeply saddened by the death of the old man, but I really can't agree with the behavior of the deceased's son, who does not find the cause of the death of the mother herself, but puts the responsibility on the owner of the suitcase and claims high compensation from the owner of the suitcase, which inevitably makes people suspect that the deceased's son is using the death of his mother to profit for himself.

The aunt tripped over the suitcase and died at the station, and its owner needs to be held responsible, after all, it was because he did not take care of the suitcase that caused this tragedy to happen, and it is reasonable to compensate the victim to a certain extent!

I don't think the host needs to be held responsible. It was caused by the aunt herself not seeing clearly that there was a suitcase next to her.

If the luggage is placed correctly, you are not responsible, but if it is not, you are responsible, after all, it has caused deaths.

Responsibility should be taken. The owner of the suitcase saw that the aunt was not in good health and did not remove the suitcase, which caused a tragedy.

There is no need to bear it, because it was the aunt herself who tripped in front of the suitcase, and the suitcase did not move.

Only bear part of the responsibility, because the suitcase did not block the normal road, and the aunt accidentally hit it has nothing to do with the owner, of course, the owner also has the fault of not placing the items.

No, the suitcase is placed in a fixed position, and people passing by should be able to see it, but they didn't pay attention to it when they tripped.

An old lady in Beijing tripped over a suitcase and died, does the owner of the suitcase need to bear legal responsibility?

There is an old man in Beijing in the process of preparing to take the train at the train station, accidentally tripped over a suitcase carried by a woman, the old man fell to the ground at that time, and was sent to the hospital for rescue**, the old man still unfortunately left this world, the old man's family believes that the owner of the suitcase must bear the corresponding liability for compensation, so the owner of the suitcase sued the court and asked for 620,000 yuan in compensation.

After investigation, the court ruled that the deceased was walking in the wrong direction at the train station according to the results displayed at the scene, and the woman who was pulling the suitcase also took the initiative to avoid the old man, but the old man directly knocked down the suitcase carried by the woman regardless of it, and later fell, so the court held that the owner of the suitcase was not at fault and did not need to pay any compensation costs, so it rejected the claim of the deceased's family. Although the family of the deceased did not obey the verdict and appealed, the court still did not support the claim of the family of the deceased for compensation in the second instance, so the owner of the suitcase did not need to bear any legal responsibility in this matter.

Judging from the on-site monitoring, it is entirely due to the old man's personal behavior that caused him to fall, and others are not responsible, the old man's family violates the facts, like the owner of the suitcase asking for compensation, which is obviously very unreasonable, plus the old man himself is relatively old, when he took the train, his family did not accompany Lu Mintong, and the most important thing is that in the process of the old man's hospitalization, even if the doctor dissuades the old man's family and insists on letting the old man's **, The family of the old man has been asking the doctor to take off the old man's ventilator, which led to the death of the old man, so in this matter, the family of the old man has an unshirkable responsibility, and it is obviously premeditated to ask others for compensation for no reason, so their claim has not been supported by the court's demolition of the hole, and I have to say that the family of the old man. It's really some people who see money, and for the sake of money, they don't hesitate to use their old people as bets, which is really outrageous.

No, because the person pulling the suitcase consciously avoided the old man, but the old man hit the suitcase, which is some responsibility of the old man.

Of course not. Because this was caused by the old lady's own carelessness, and this suitcase was not put in an unknown place, it had nothing to do with the owner of the suitcase, and the owner of the suitcase did not need to pay legal responsibility.

I don't think the owner of the suitcase needs to be held legally responsible, because this matter is not the fault of the owner of the suitcase.

Judging from the surveillance screen, the road was not crowded at that time, there was a lot of walking space, Ms. Wang (the deceased)'s son was not around, she may have turned around and went backwards to find her son, but she did not notice that Ms. Liu's suitcase was at her feet, she tripped on the spot, her waist and buttocks hit the ground first, she rolled on the ground and fainted in half a circle, and later died in 13 days, and the diagnosis was cerebral hemorrhage. The specific follow-up is still under trial, and the court will announce the verdict at a later date.

That is, the aunt tripped over the suitcase while walking, and she died like this, so this kind of thing makes us feel very sorry.

At that time, the aunt tripped over a suitcase at the entrance of the train station, resulting in a cerebral hemorrhage, and died after rescue failed.

At that time, Ms. Liu, who was pulling the suitcase, did not notice that the suitcase in her hand had tripped Ms. Wang. It wasn't until after the other party fell that Ms. Liu realized that the problem had occurred.

At that time, when the aunt turned back to look for her son at the entrance of Beijing West Railway Station, she didn't pay attention to the suitcase next to her, so she tripped and fell to the ground, but she didn't find anything abnormal at that time, and she found that she was unconscious in the afternoon and died 15 days later.

Ms. Wang, a 67-year-old woman from Beijing West Railway Station, tripped and injured herself in her suitcase and died 15 days later, and her family claimed 620,000 yuan from the owner of the suitcase.

Whether there is subjective fault and the magnitude of the fault are the core disputes in this case.

Because the objective facts are very simple, the deceased died after hitting the defendant's trolley box and fell to the ground, and there was a lack of timely rescue after the fact, which is objectively manifested. The defendant was not at fault for waiting quietly to enter the station, but on the contrary, the deceased had the bad behavior of going retrograde in a public place, and should be condemned.

Courts should take a long-term viewThe plaintiff's claim in this case cannot be supported, otherwise it will give an opportunity for speculators like this in societyI think if this can be won, there will be no problem of whether to help or not in the future, it is estimated that the elderly have to stay away, just like seeing a child fall, parents will say blame this floor, blame this chair, similar to this kind of dumping behavior.

This can also be explained by the rules of basketball, whether it is an offensive foul or a blocking foul, the defender of the offensive foul does not move, and the offensive team takes the initiative to hit the defender on the premise that the feet are steady, there is no body tilt and there is no downward pressure action of both hands.

The offensive player who blocked the foul has been activated, the defender has a lag in position, and the defender predicts the offensive line of the offensive player in advance and moves to the offensive line.

The defendant did not move, and the deceased took the initiative to hit the box in the wrong direction at the entrance of the pit stop, which must have been an offensive foul.

I think the old man is mainly responsible, after all, there are a lot of people at the train station, and the lady with the suitcase belongs to the normal queue, and she avoids it, which is too wronged if she is responsible.

Both parties are responsible, the placement of the suitcase is responsible for not observing the pedestrian status, and the tripping person is also responsible for not observing the specific situation.

The man who pulls the suitcase is responsible, pulling such a large suitcase and only caring about walking forward, but not paying attention to the pedestrians on both sides, tripping the old man and causing death, and the owner of the suitcase is mainly responsible.

Both parties are responsible. After the old man tripped over his suitcase, he was already unwell, but he did not seek medical attention in time. And the owner of the suitcase did not deliberately move the old man in, just because he was in a blind spot.

But everyone should be more cautious when dragging their suitcase while walking.

Responsibilities of the owner of the suitcase. Because according to civil liability, it should be the responsibility of the owner of the suitcase.

The responsibility of the old man, whose suitcase is not pulled, is it close to the **? The old man himself does not look at the road, no one is to blame, and the owner of the box is not at fault.

At the trial on the morning of August 20, the son of the deceased Ms. Wang and the husband of Ms. Liu appeared in court as the plaintiff and the defendant in the lawsuit.

The plaintiff argued that the defendant was at fault for Ms. Wang's fall and death, and should bear at least 60% of the responsibilityThe plaintiff claimed a total of 620,000 yuan from the defendant Ms. Liu, including medical expenses, death compensation, and compensation for mental damages.

The defendant Ms. Liu's lawsuit alleges, "It is a fact that Ms. Wang tripped over Ms. Liu's suitcase and fell and was injured, but the defendant was not at fault, let alone seriously at fault. ”

At that time, Ms. Wang's son sent his mother on the train, but when he left the entrance of the station, he did not take proper care of his mother, Ms. Wang was in a hurry to find her son, and tripped over Ms. Liu's suitcase. ”

In addition, the defendant also argued that Ms. Wang did not seek medical attention in a timely manner after the accident. His son left his mother alone on the train and was taken to the hospital five hours after he fell, delaying the best time for treatment and aggravating the injury.

Moreover, they moved from the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, which has better medical conditions, to Hebei Youai Hospital, and their families also asked to remove the ventilator and oxygen nasal cannula, resulting in Ms. Wang's death from respiratory failure.

I think the family of the deceased bears a lot of responsibility in the whole thing, after the whole incident, I think Ms. Liu's approach is reasonable, but it negatively exposes her incompetence as a child, and did not seek medical treatment in time after the old man fell, and also moved out of a better hospital, pulled out the life-sustaining breathing, and eventually led to the death of the old man's respiratory failure, but in turn asked Ms. Liu to compensate, I don't understand this matter, the family is from the perspective of money or just for a reason?

I hope that the court will give a satisfactory result.

Fengtai Court** heard a case of "the old man tripped over the suitcase and died 15 days later", and the family of the old man sued the owner of the box for 620,000 yuan.

The family of the elderly felt that the defendant was at fault in the cause of death, and the defendant should bear great responsibility, and the family of the elderly claimed more than 600,000 yuan from the defendant for medical expenses and death compensation.

The family of the elderly believes that the owner of the suitcase is at fault and has to bear 60% of the responsibility, including medical expenses, death compensation, funeral expenses, and a total of 620,000 yuan, and has sued the owner of the suitcase.

The family of the elderly claimed compensation from the user of the suitcase, arguing that the death of the elderly man was directly related to the fact that the elderly person tripped over the suitcase.

At present, the family of the elderly has appealed to the defendant Ms. Liu for a series of expenses totaling 620,000 yuan, including medical expenses, death compensation, and mental damages.

After the old man accidentally tripped over the suitcase, so that he fell to his death, this incident was unexpected, and the owner of the suitcase did not mean it, and the old man also had some of his own physical reasons, but the family did not think so, and the family would ask for a certain amount of compensation.

The family claimed 620,000 yuan from the owner of the box, believing that the owner of the box was fully responsible. However, the owner of the box believed that the family did not cooperate with the hospital** and refused to compensate.

Claim compensation. Because the family of the old man believes that it is the owner of the suitcase, they demand compensation.

The family of the elderly man filed a claim for compensation of 620,000 yuan because they believed that the owner of the suitcase was grossly at fault.