See who makes the most sense 20 and see who makes the most sense in the analysis

Shang Ying's reform laid the foundation for the later strength of the country, from the perspective of progress and development, it was successful, as for whether he himself was successful, I personally think it was also successful, he basically completed what he had to do, and he could not see whether he had completely completed his goals, there were many events in history, which were very long, and could not be completed in a person's life, and they should all be considered successful.

Shang Ying's changes really made the Qin State stronger.

It can be said that the credit for the future unification of the whole country is also part of the Shang Dynasty.

As for the fact that he was framed.

I think it's a re-inevitable one. The Shang Dynasty was a process of transforming slavery into feudalism. Of course, they will be ostracized by some slave owners. In the wise people can not hide.

Here's an example. Sun Bin is such a smart person. was still harmed by Pang Juan.

Han Fei is a smart person. was still killed by Li Si.

Shang Ying used to be a native of Wei, because the monarch of Wei could not listen to Shang Ying's reforms.

persuasion, so Shang Ying came to the Qin State who was willing to change the law. Death for a confidant. Be a person who can stand at the forefront of the times, be talented, and have ambitions.

When I met a Ming Jun who appreciated his talent, of course he would dedicate himself to his ideals at all costs, this is the difference between Shang Yang and ordinary people. It doesn't matter if you cut off your head, as long as the doctrine is true. In fact, not only Xia Minghan, but also many people in Chinese history have been deeply influenced by this traditional culture, and they are mighty and unyielding.

Today, there are too few such people.

First, this is not a truth, the meaning of this passage should be said in this way, no matter any adult, when he sees a crying child, he will coax him, of course, the vast majority of people will be like this, this is a kind of child care psychology, for a long time, the child will always think that continuing to cry will have a good result, this is a matter of time habits.

Second, on the other hand, if you knew that your enemy was afraid of you, would you still be afraid of him? Therefore, the child thinks that the adults are afraid that he will cry and compromises with him. Adults are vulnerable, I don't think I need to say more.

Thirdly, the first is to understand the opposite, the adult may be capricious, and the child will not understand how the adult thinks, he just habitually thinks that crying will be beneficial. Well, keep crying, you might pretend you don't hear. It's the same in business warfare, and if you're not really sure it's going to work, don't go too far.

It's okay to cry, but it must be taken by sugar.

The meaning is very simple, and the explanation is as follows:

1. This is true to a certain extent, but it is not applicable all the time, and it mainly depends on what the other party is like. To put it simply, you must know how to express yourself, provided that the other party is just bluffing, these four words are very important.

2. As long as you understand the other party's temperament and know that the other party is bluffing, then in order to achieve your own goals, you won't have so many scruples, you love to scold, anyway, it's not true, I just get what I want.

3. It takes skills to use in practical life, and it is difficult to go from theory to practice, after all, not everyone is your parents, and they will definitely revolve around you. For example, if a poor county cries poverty with a higher authority, it may receive poverty alleviation funds; A good student will get an inch in the face of a teacher who likes him. In the business war, the partner can only gain a foothold in the competition if it has your support, and then you can put forward conditions, which is about what it means.

One last word of caution, everything is enough in moderation, and too much. If the child cries so much, the parents will really hit it.

Man has a monopoly and monopoly nature.

Only, the crying child has milk to eat, he does not understand what is controlled, nor does he understand what order you have, let alone who cares about the intimidation of adults, and will care about the bluff threat of force, and there is no one in his eyes at all, that is: he can eliminate and restrict competition and the behavior that may eliminate or restrict competition.

So in everyday life. Business wars "only the husband does not fight, so the world can not fight with it." ”

Shopping malls are like battlefields, "recorded with the words of blood and fire" The game of capital and wisdom can have such a realm of "indisputable" words, and only then can you write the wisdom of your personal, national and national wisdom.

It's not philosophy, trust me.