Little White Little White IS 70300L Choose one of the masters

There is no difference in the lens structure used by the XXB and the Love Death XXB, so there is no difference in imaging. The latter is equipped with the hand shake compensation mechanism, the IS Image Stabilizer, which compensates for shutter speed equivalent to 4 stops at all focal lengths, and provides mode 1 for normal shooting and mode 2 for follow-up shooting. In addition, the lens mount and switch panel have been sealed and optimized to better realize the waterproof and dustproof function, which is also the main reason for the price difference with XXB.

Fat White is the same as the Love Death XXB in terms of anti-shake system and sealing optimization processing. However, compared with XXB, the fluorite lens is relatively reduced in the lens structure, and the aperture is also a variable aperture, which is inferior in imaging quality, but it is also a red circle head, and the inferiority mentioned here is relative to XXB, which does not mean that this head is not good. As for the extra 100 focal lengths to understand, it will vary from person to person.

Photography enthusiasts have a relatively more preference for fat white, and professionals are more fond of xxb and love death xxb, which is estimated to be caused by high requirements for imaging, coupled with the introduction and recommendation of xxb and love death xxb is more popular, so that some enthusiasts choose to tend to xxb and love death xxb. However, I use fat white, and now it is generally used with 17-40, and the effect is good.

IS is for stabilization, which is useful if the shutter is near the critical line. However, an anti-shake 3000 yuan is really not worth it, and it may be better to buy a tripod, but it is not so convenient It depends on the personal choice. Xiaoxiaobai is a constant aperture, suitable for portrait shooting, 70-300L is a floating aperture, suitable for travel Theoretically, Xiaoxiaobai's image quality will be a little better, but 70-300L will have an extra 100 focal length It is more convenient to see personal choice.

The effect of the anti-shake function in the process of handheld camera shooting is obvious, not like what the critical point mentioned upstairs is useful, Xiaoxiaobai is a product of the film era, because of the excellent workmanship, good imaging, so it has been used to this day. Nowadays, the application of image stabilization technology in lenses is an inevitable trend, so it is the best choice to choose a telephoto lens with image stabilization. The difference between Xiaoxiaobai and 70-300L on the first floor is very clear, there is nothing suitable for portraits and suitable for travel, Xiaoxiaobai's imaging advantages are self-evident, not theoretical, facts.

Older lenses were less resistant to dust, and improvements in these areas were necessary. The choice of focal length is still determined by each person's actual needs. Recommend IS Xiaoxiaobai.

It's Xiaoxiaobai's is almost the same as Xiaobai's**.

Xiaobai wins at a larger aperture, and the background blur is a little better.

Xiaoxiaobai's imaging is better than Xiaobai's, and there is image stabilization, and it is also lightweight, if you are not pursuing the ultimate bokeh, it is definitely better to choose IS Xiaoxiaobai.

ISXXB, ISXB, XXB, XB, these four heads are the most difficult to choose. My personal recommendation is ISXXB, or XXB. There are several reasons for this:

1. First of all, weight must be a priority. We are playing machines, not playing machines, don't work too hard for yourself, it's not necessary!

2. Secondly, in terms of imaging, XXB is better than XB, because the structure of the lens ultimately affects imaging, XXB and ISXXB have a fluorite lens, while XB and ISXB do not. In terms of the use of depth of field, if there is geometry, it will be used, even if it is used, the background of the character is too empty and it is not good-looking, unless the character is very good-looking.

3. Finally, considering that since the ** of these lenses are increasing in multiples, therefore, with the priority of the greatest cost performance, at present, the first-hand xxb** is within 5000, which is extremely cost-effective. If you're on a budget, you might want to join ISXXB.

1、The portrait feels like is xxb bokeh in general,After all, the maximum aperture is 4,XB is not easy to grasp without anti-shake,In addition, you will still think about ISXB when you enter these two,It's better to save enough money to get ISXB in one step。

2. I feel that I use a lot of wide-angle shooting buildings, and I can surprise the grandeur of the building, and the composition of the building is limited by telephoto shooting.

3. According to your shooting theme, you can enter the original factory 10-22 or Tokina 12-24 F4, or Sigma 10-20 to shoot architecture, and 50 or 85 or 135 2 to shoot portraits.

It is recommended that you buy Xiaobaiis, otherwise Xiaoxiaobai and Xiaobai will make you feel disabled

Do you want iris or stabilization? In addition, Xiaobai comes standard with a tripod ring, which is not available to Xiaoxiaobai. A tripod ring from the auxiliary factory costs dozens of dollars.

It's not good! These two lenses are not used for portraits!

70-200f4lis:

How do you shoot portraits with the aperture of F4L? How do I blur the background? Even if you use the longest focus of 200mm to blur, what is your safe shutter?

1/400?What rays can reach 1 400?If you go on a tripod, then shooting portraits is too tiring and slow to be efficient, don't expect is, serious photography still has to go on a tripod.

It's too heavy, even 85L will make your arms sore for a while, not to mention Xiaobai, it's difficult to make a good film when shooting without a tripod this lens, when there is a tripod, plus Xiaobai, you don't want to take them out at all, because it's too heavy!

Therefore, it is recommended to take portraits cheaper, and the licensed goods are within 2800, and the quality is very good"Close to perfection"

Or the value-for-money 135L, parallel goods** about 5500 yuan, the sharpness is very high, the color is very rich, it is a bit similar to 35L and 50L, but the resolution is definitely above 50L, this lens is highly recommended.

The main thing is to look at the use.

If there are more opportunities for handheld shooting, stabilization is better.

It also depends on the performance of the body (high light sensitivity).

Because both wide aperture and stabilization do the same thing.

From a practical point of view, I think it's better to love Xiaoxiaobai, it's lighter, it's easier to hold and it's rarely used to shoot apertures.

In addition, shooting people with a telephoto is inevitably a little farther.

If it's me, I'd rather get one or the image quality and sharpness don't lose the red circle zoom.

Go to the shadow of Mowgli to see what a noisy mess.

Questions with no answers.

Canon: **Quite is to take what you need **The disparity is that there are different grades and imaging quality, and there are different opinions.

What I like about XXB is because XB is so heavy and it's as simple as that.

The image quality parameters are definitely better, and the quality of the lens is not the same, but there is no difference from the actual effect, and the love of Xiaoxiaobai is anti-shake, very practical function!!

Both are fine, because the Terminator is an XBIS

To shoot a concert, first of all, you have to make sure that you can bring a tripod into it.

Normally, if you're not a journalist or something, it's almost impossible to bring it in.

So you have to buy a light one, otherwise you will lose your shoulders or something.

It's best to wear anti-shake, because not to shoot paste is the first thing, so from this point of view, the recommendation is to be a little white.

Teleconverters will sacrifice a bunch of things, aperture, the aperture you want is gone, image quality, so it is not recommended.

In addition, I don't know whether the landlord's camera is full-frame or non-full-frame, if it is full-frame, Xiaoxiaobai's focal length, you have to sit in front of 10 rows, if it is not full-frame, there is a coefficient, that is, 320mm focal length, then sit in front of 30 rows, and it is also becoming.

Da Bai's words are really not recommended, the first is expensive, thousands of dollars more expensive than Xiao Xiaobai, and the second is heavy, you have to use a tripod.

Third, you can't just watch a concert to burn such a shot, next time you use it and don't know the year of the monkey, in short, if you sit far away from the stage, then I think it's better to buy a VIP ticket.

Xiaoxiaobai is can buy a Hong Kong line, save about 1,000 yuan, about 7700.

I hope it will be helpful to the landlord.,After reading the landlord's supplement.,Then according to the landlord's delivery of this condition,If you still choose between these two lenses,Of course, it's Xiaoxiaobai,The first row,320The focal length used in 7D is too enough,In fact, the first row,Use the full-frame machine next to the ruler for example5D2,200The focal length is enough enough.,There's really no need for a magnifier.,Big white or something.。

Besides, this lens is also convenient for you to use in other occasions.

Compared with Xiaobaiis,The improvement of the second-generation Xiaobaiis,ISThe stabilization has been increased from the previous 3 levels to 4 levels,In addition, the closest focusing distance of the lens has also been increased to meters,The magnification of the lens has been increased from multiple to double,There is also a significant improvement in the lens of the lens,The improvement of the shooting effect and the use experience is still obvious,So if the budget is sufficient,XiaobaiIS second generation must be a better choice for the landlord。

The aperture is f4, and the lens stabilization function is with IS.

With lens stabilization, it can theoretically increase the shutter speed by three stops.

There is a difference in the lenses, and the IS version of the lenses is better. Of course, the IS version has IS, and the lens is stabilized, but Xiaoxiaobai does not.

Everything else should be about the same. However, I believe that Canon will improve the quality of the IS version.