Which is better, Icon 4nano or ESI U46XL? I heard that icon exploded under win7

I don't have anything to say about ESI's sound card, because I haven't used it, about the sound card of the icon, I have a few words to say, icon 4nano is currently in use, very stable, there is no problem you said, but** aspect, 1200, you are the seller you saw in the 2080 room on yy, I bought it there, of course it is very expensive, in fact, it should be 1050, or lower, it is recommended not to go to the 2080 room to buy, the effect of their adjustment is average, and it has been used for a long time, You will find that there are a lot of problems, I bought it from the fat man in Luna's studio, the pit man, a dime is as big as the moon, you are the master before the transaction, and after the transaction, you will die in the pit, and you will suffer from it, and the selling price of their Aixiu products is even more outrageous. With the experience of a person who has come over, I would like to advise you to buy equipment, keep your eyes open, expensive is not necessarily good, don't be deceived by the surface, hope to be cautious.

I'm using the U46XL now, and the performance is stable! I'm also a win764-bit system! 980 bought, free shipping to help adjust, debugging is OK!

If you want to talk about the effect, you still have to adjust it yourself, but the after-sales debugging of that house is still very patient, because I just bought it back, I don't know how to play, and I often mess up those jumpers, and he helps me get it every time I find after-sales adjustment! icon 4nano has not been used, and I dare not speak nonsense!

esi u46xl 。I've been using this for almost a year now.

EISU46XL is the first choice, the drive is stable and easy to operate, and the cost performance is quite high.

icon4nano is a little better. The UK Pro has linear inputs. If anything, put it on this.

But now these sound cards are no longer cost-effective.

icon things, indicators are the same, so generally choose the one with more functions.

CUBE is just a little better-looking, a little smaller, UTRACK Pro has a high-impedance instrument interface, CUBE Nano does not.

I feel that the icon is flipping tricks, what cube nano, fancy, but the indicators have not improved.

Icon Uports 4 is an upgraded version of the 4nano. Mobile U is powered by a separate adapter.

It's more stable du as for the effect. Uports 4 is a little better than Mobile U.

Better than 4nano. But.

daomobile uI think it's stable. Special power supply. There are a lot of these models of sound cards that are debugged. Mobile U has hardly had any major problems.

In terms of recording, in fact, I personally feel that these two sound cards are a little better.

Maya ESI U46XL Maya sound card is one of the world's most famous German audio equipment manufacturers.

It's much better than that Aiken second-rate. Especially on the drive.

You don't really need to look at the sound card or anything. Just look at the sound card driver and you will understand everything.

Aiken's sound card is the best in the same kind of external version, and the price is still in the acceptance range, pure hardware ASIO, low latency driver, very good.

I'm using utrack.,The appearance is red.,Mainly because I personally like an independent power supply of sound cards.,I've used it for a few years.,There's no problem.,4nano hasn't been used.,But it's a little more expensive than mine.,It should be better.。