Is EMC or Symantec better?

Personally, I feel that EMC is better, and the integration launched by hardware manufacturers is still more reliable, in fact, don't pay too much attention to what the manufacturer says, the key is to be clear about what effect you want. To give you an overview of the effects of the two disaster recovery modes:

1.Traditional data backup and disaster recovery: A complete copy of production data is kept in hardware (storage) by compressing, deduplicating, transcoding, etc., as the basis for future recovery. The disadvantage is that there will be a recovery waiting time during restoration, because the process of transcoding data during backup and then backing up is generally used.

Representatives: EMC, IBM, Dell, Syman, etc.).

2.Hot Standby Disaster Recovery: The data is transmitted to the disaster recovery end through the network, and the requirement is that the disaster recovery end must be written by the server as the basis for writing, and generally does not do transcoding, deduplication and other actions. Of course, the bad thing is that there are limitations when dealing with very large data, such as terabytes of data.

stands for Rose, Autostart, Syman, etc.).

The key is to see what effect you want to judge the result you want.

Thank you! Ask for points!

As I said upstairs, you have to figure out the requirements first, and there are two vague aspects of your needs.

1. There is a big difference between disaster recovery and backup, you want to go to disaster recovery, but you choose backup products.

2. Backup mainly focuses on high availability, including support for VM data migration, backup and recovery windows, etc., the data compression ratio, data deduplication, data recovery ratio, compatibility, operability and easy scalability that you care about are not the core of backup.

If you really want to choose, I recommend Simon. The market share and ease of use of its backup software are unmatched by DD. There are very few system administrators who have not used BE or NBU.

Very mature product. The advantage of DD is the deduplication ratio of the high-end (such as 890), and the low-end has not been touched, but the performance is definitely down a notch.

In conclusion, I suggest you think from a business perspective, not a product.

Symantec, support all devices, you buy NetE can only be used on EMC, in the future you are destined to only buy EMC and can only do data-level backup, Symantec's BE2012 (or 3600 all-in-one machine), NBU5230 (or 5230 all-in-one machine) is definitely better, support deduplication function and many other advantages.

I don't know, you can go and ask the experts.

Integrated disaster recovery is indeed a trend, and now Symantec, IBM, Oracle, HP, Huawei, AISHU, and Li Ji Yi have launched related products. It is worth mentioning that the all-in-one disaster recovery backup machine of Heli Ji Yi has two types of products to choose from, focusing on data disaster recovery and application disaster recovery respectively. It can realize database disaster recovery and backup under Windows and Linux (support real-time backup of MS SQL, Oracle, MySQL, DB2, Sybase, Kingbase, and Interbase databases, rollback at any point and ensure the integrity of the rollback data, centralized backup and centralized management, remote disaster recovery, and data recovery at any point in time), file backup (real-time backup, version rollback, sharing) and desktop backup (real-time scheduled backup, drag-and-drop upload, quick backup, mapping**, encryption, compression, filtering, sharing, rollback) and other functions, and the application disaster recovery appliance can also realize the takeover function to ensure business continuity.

Symantec, Commvoult, EMC, Weeam, Huawei Zhixin, Langqing Technology, etc. At present, LANKING Technology has done a good job in disaster recovery and backup, and there are many mature cases of radical travel.

Domestic Langqing technology is doing well.

Software: Symantec launches Storage Foundation

Alternatively, homogeneous storage uses a backup module for remote asynchronous synchronization, or virtualized storage provides remote disaster recovery for heterogeneous storage.

It depends on whether you want to implement application or data-level disaster recovery, how long the switchover time allows, and how much data loss is allowed.

IBM MetroMirror and GlobalMirror implement synchronous and asynchronous remote backup.

1. Symantec: Their earliest product is Ghost, I believe everyone has used, a very powerful product, and then acquired Veritas, he integrated Veritas with his own technology, only to come out of Be and NBU, and so far Microsoft's own backup software is still Veritas, you can imagine how stable their product is, as for the disaster recovery of data, it is actually another product - Veritas Storage foundation。 And the biggest advantage of their products is when you have multiple platforms.

If you're on a unified platform, like EMC or IBM, it's better if you use their own backup product.

2. Aishu and Quick Preparation: Both are domestic brands, and the advantage is that they are cheaper, but they are not as good as Simon in terms of performance and safety, after all, Simon has been tested for many years.

3. There is also Kangfu: the English name is commvault, their technology came out of Simon, and then made their own brand, of course, it is similar to Simon's. **It's all about the same as Simon's.

But the good thing is that he's put the product together and doesn't require you to buy deduplication separately. The others are the same as Simon's. But the after-sales service may be almost bad, after all, there is no economic strength of Syman.

It's also a brand you can consider.

The choice of data backup software depends on what kind of data you need, what functions you want to achieve, whether the enterprise needs to choose a domestic or foreign brand, and what kind of demand you have. In fact, many enterprise users are very entangled in **, foreign products are too expensive, do not want to use, domestic products do not know who to choose, in fact, there are many domestic software is still good, for example, Rui Yun Hanlin and a few upstairs said that those brands are good brands. Personally, I think that if you want to use any software, you can go to the site for an inspection or try out the software.

It depends on how the company chooses!

Cloud Core: An emerging disaster recovery backup vendor in China, the main product is XCLOUD-TECH, XCLOUD-TECH is really more than disaster recovery, takes over the business in real time, and restores the business in minutes, which can not only protect data but also protect workloads. It is believed that Yunxin will develop into a brand of domestic content disaster backup in the next few years.

Shanghai Langqing Information Technology Co., Ltd. is the largest backup and disaster recovery software manufacturer in China, and has a first-class brand influence in the field of backup and disaster recovery.

The largest backup and disaster recovery software manufacturer in China.

Symantec USA is the best at information security.

Recently, there is a new product, multi-backup, which is specialized in data backup and disaster recovery, and applies the theory of cloud storage.

I haven't adopted it yet!

It is recommended that you use a backup software called multi-backup, which should be a SaaS application in the strict sense.

1.Symantec: It is the earliest data backup software vendor, and currently only has two products, BE and NBU.

One is a generation-end product and the other is a high-end product. BE once dominated the entire Chinese backup market, but now it can't keep up with the times. The NBU is a product that they acquired in previous years (BE was also acquired).

Their products are average overall.

2.Aishu: It can be regarded as the boss of domestic backup, the company is the largest, and it is also very early in domestic products, but his current development direction is more inclined to hardware products, such as file servers. The real backup feature can only be described as average.

3.Quick preparation: I haven't heard of it, it should be a small manufacturer in China, the products of this kind of small manufacturers are cheap, simple to operate, and belong to the tool class of products. If the number of machines that need to be backed up is not large, and the quality of the backup is not high, you can test the filter.

4.The Kangfu mentioned upstairs is also an American product, similar to NBU, the company is called Kangfu, and the product is called Simpana. The user experience is good, and the company is growing quite fast.

It is one of the fastest growing backup vendors. Table-level recovery of databases is possible. Among the above several products, I think it is the best.

If I'm not mistaken, VMware integrates it into its own vCenter for VM backup, and EMC does its own solution for high-end products. EMC's acquisition of NetWorker is not bad, and it is on the same level as NBU and Simpana.

As I said upstairs, today's backup products have their own characteristics, and you need to choose one according to your needs. In terms of function, there is not much difference between everyone. It mainly depends on the ease of use of the server and the product.

Many units can't use the backup system. It caused a great deal of waste. It is recommended to use domestic products.

It is recommended to try and test first. I feel that I can really use it before buying.

1. Symantec: Symantec is a solution provider in the field of information security, providing enterprises, individual users and service providers with a wide range of content and network security software and hardware solutions, which can help individuals and enterprises ensure the security, availability and integrity of information.

2. Veritas data protection solutions are focused on providing reliable, scalable software storage management, backup and recovery capabilities for heterogeneous environments—from the desktop to the data center.

Remote disaster recovery can be divided into intra-city or off-site, synchronous or asynchronous, and software or hardware.

In the case of software, Symantec can achieve 3-4 levels of data-level disaster recovery for ordinary investment, and 2-level application-level disaster recovery for high investment.

The hardware is done with a disk array, and the disk array should be one local and one in the other place, and the storage data replication software must be configured, and the same city can be synchronized, and the remote is generally asynchronous. Generally, big brands are fine, and Huawei Symantec is also okay if it is cheap.