ADOBE FLASH PLAYER 10 OR ADOBE READER 9,2, WHICH ONE SHOULD BE DELETED?

1.One is the browser's required animation** plug-in Adobe Flash Player 10, and the other is the essential software for e-book reading, adobe reader 9,2, can you delete it??

2.Both are essential software for installation. If you don't read e-books, you can delete Adobe Reader 9,2, this program supports many formats of e-books to read, it's a pity to delete it!!

Browser required animation** plug-in adobe flash player 10 can not be deleted, if deleted, you browse the web without ****, animation, only display blank *, can not display and other blank screen and prompts! Then you can only look at the text!! Is this still online?

It is strongly recommended to keep both and delete them in a hurry, otherwise it will be inconvenient to use and will not be able to browse the web and read the electronic text!!

Adobe Flash Player is used to watch Flash on the Internet.

Adobe Reader 9,2 is used to open PDF documents.

Adobe Download Manager is used to automatically update both of these things.

In a word, ignore them and delete them.

10 is much better, reflected in 1) occupies a smaller space, 9 after the installation of Mori Liang Youbi about 280m of space, 10 only needs more than 140m; 2) 10 with this Huai annotation function, 9 is without this function.

If the small screen is normal and the full-screen card is full-screen, it is estimated that it is the graphics card performance, network speed, network card and other problems.

Adobe has just published a high-severity vulnerability in FlashPlayer, Adobe Reader, and Acrobat that could allow an attacker to remotely control a victim's computer. Adobe said it had received an information report about the vulnerability on Friday, but there is still no official patch release.

The following software versions are currently affected by this vulnerability:

editions and releases, as well as earlier and series releases, including Windows, Macintosh, Linux, and Solaris platforms.

Adobe Reader and earlier versions, including Windows, Macintosh, and Unix platforms.

However, Adobe has officially confirmed that the version, Adobe Reader and are not affected by this vulnerability.

Adobe has not stated when an official patch will be released, but as advised by Adobe, regular users can upgrade to a version to temporarily address the vulnerability.

Adobe Acrobat and Reader users can solve the problem by deleting, renaming, or restricting access to files, although this may cause the software to crash when opening a PDF document containing SWF content, but it is a good temporary solution for the computer to be controlled by hackers.

Adobe Reader software. The default installation directory of the DLL file is here, and the default installation directory of Acrobat is here.

It looks like you have Adobe Flash CS3 installed

Let's keep it as normal.

Adobe Reader Simplified, this one is relatively large. But it's not very big, why don't you just clean up the disk space? Or transfer the virtual memory to a non-system disk.

Delete the second one, and then install a foxit reader to read the pdf.

Plug-ins for IE and non-IE browsers,Keep it.,It's not impactful.,It doesn't take up space.。

You can delete the first one!

Others are a must!

Please accept the judgment to the mailbox before sending.

I don't know what the difference is, but I know the most important thing: Adobe Flash Player is not affected by this vulnerability On June 7, Beijing time, according to foreign ** reports, the well-known software company Adobe issued an announcement, which mainly focuses on major security vulnerabilities in Flash Player, Reader, Acrobat and other components. The vulnerability, codenamed CVE-2010-1297, could allow hackers to move, modify, and delete system files at will, thereby gaining control of a computer

Adobe Flash Player or above; Adobe Reader and Acrobat versions above. The company emphasizes that the latest version of Adobe Flash Player is not affected by this vulnerability. There is no most effective way to fix it, but users can defend against this attack with the latest version.

It's best to pack the two together and it's okay and there is not much difference