Ask the students who are studying liberal arts. How to answer the question of history?

A: History is a combination of vertical and horizontal. Personally, I feel that there is no point in simply memorizing the meaning and essence, because the current exam questions will not be asked like this, and there are very few questions that can be ignored. The big topic is often comprehensive, not a knowledge point, an event, and its meaning, it is a combination of vertical and horizontal.

It has nothing to do with what you have learned, there are previous reasons and the answers to big questions are often abstract and comprehensive, not simply listing and piling up. In addition, learning history needs to be memorized, not memorized, but understood!

Grasp the main point: You need to read the question carefully to understand the intention of the person who wrote the question and what is being asked. It looks like crap, and when you really understand that this is actually what it is.

Hope it inspires you.

When answering the question, first look at what the score of the question is, usually there are 2-3 points for one point, and at the points, they are usually divided into politics, military, economy, culture, foreign relations, ancient Chinese history and ethnic relations, and it is almost the same to discuss the points.

Well, I'm a liberal arts major, and relatively speaking, history and politics are better. Personally, I feel that no matter which course it is, book knowledge is the foundation. Only by memorizing the knowledge in books can we expand and extend.

In addition, you should read some books related to history, and you will probably grasp the following historical context.

The specific methods are: 1. Take good notes in class and find a memorization method that suits you.

2: Ask more questions and learn to draw inferences.

Three: summarize with certain clues.

A little suggestion, I hope your grades improve!!

If it's purely for the final exam, there's no need to do it, someone will mark the key points for us at that time, and just memorize it. But if you want to choose history as your relevant subject, it is recommended that you still really understand history, do not memorize it, or see if you have a sense of history.

Key points: Start with the basics, time, place, people, events, meaning, influence, etc.

You don't have to memorize the questions, just look at what answer points are given in the materials, just what direction, generally the country.

The influence of the country plus the influence of foreign countries, or the influence of politics, economy, culture, nationality and military) The current college entrance examination, history has undergone a lot of reforms, anyway, my current session (2010) test is the pizza scoring standard: some questions must use the words that appear in the book, and not only one direction, to consider both horizontally and vertically, and the writing should be fluent, not the accumulation of knowledge points, to have their own thoughts in it (but this point must be slow).

Anyway, in addition to reading more books, you can choose to watch CCTV's documentary "The Rise of a Great Power", as well as the documentary channel's "Cultural China" and documentaries and the like, and the flowing ** is easier for people to remember.

That's all, I hope you can remember the advice of my past people!

Oh my God, this question is more detailed. First of all, I want to state that I am studying law, not history.

In fact, this question is to test the time and scope of application of the promulgation of these laws. The Twelve Bronze Tables were compiled in ancient Rome in 452-451 B.C. at the strong request of the civilian tribunes and the efforts of the commoners, after 506 B.C., so they are excluded.

Similarly, the Code of Justinian was promulgated in 529 A.D. and re-enacted in 534 after the Code of Justinian was amended.

The Aquilian Law was enacted in 287 BC to compensate for the deficiencies in the Twelve Tables on property violations, also after 506 BC. So choose A for this question.

b. The Law of the Twelve Bronze Tables

Named after the legend that it was engraved on 12 bronze watches, it was the earliest written law in Rome and a compilation of the original customary laws. Its promulgation was associated with the struggle of the plebeians against the aristocracy.

The plebeians demanded the codification of a codified code to restrain the arbitrary interpretation of customary law by the aristocracy** who held the judicial power.

The Law of the Twelve Tables made some restrictions on the abuse of power by the nobles, and the nobles could no longer interpret the law arbitrarily, which also had an important impact on medieval and modern European jurisprudence.

Therefore, the dispute between the commoner Azai and the nobleman Villari should be based on the Twelve Tables Law

Choosing A can be completely judged from the time.

The year 506 B.C. was the 6th century B.C., and the 12 Bronze Tables appeared in the 5th century B.C., and the Aquilian Law appeared later than the 12 Bronze Tables, and the Justinian Civil Law appeared even later.

This question tests the basics, which is the time of the Twelve Bronze Tables, which was customary in Rome before the Twelve Bronze Tables.

A Analysis:

It was only in the middle of the 5th century BC that Rome had its first written code, the Twelve Tables, and before that, Rome had only customary law, not written law.

1) Stage D is the household contract responsibility system, under the premise of maintaining collective management, farmers have the right to use the land, operate independently, and be responsible for their own profits and losses.

2) The successful implementation of any system will inevitably represent the interests of the majority of the people. The fundamental purpose of the state's reform is to arouse the peasants' enthusiasm for production, increase the productive forces of the country, and improve the living standards.