The Nasri that Arsenal bought is known as Zidane II, is he similar to Ribery s technical type?

Not very similar.

NASRI's is technical.

Possession skills are high.

The passing vision is also very open.

But it's on the slower side.

But taller than Ribery.

It is an attacking midfielder.

The technique at the foot is top-notch.

When I was playing in FIFA.

I bought him. I didn't know much about it at the time.

Still in Marseille.

I just think he's younger.

And the speed is not bad (a bit worse than Ribery).

But he has a lot of promise.

Come to Arsenal.

Playing in the Premier League will be good for his development.

It is expected to be a similar type of midfielder as Cesc Fabregas.

They are a good pairing.

I guess you'll like it.

When so-and-so is called the second of whom, it is the beginning of so-and-so's bad luck.

Not to be compared to Zizou, Nasri still has a long way to go.

Franck Ribery is a player with a lot of character, fast, technical and good on the wings.

Nasri doesn't feel like much, but he's well-rounded and closer to Zizou in terms of position. But he's still young, he's not particularly outstanding in all aspects, and in general, he's still a good player.

Ribery plays wide and Nasri plays in the middle The only thing in common is that they are both short.

Nasri and Zidane can't be compared, Nasri is still very young, Wenger bought it and has to transform it into a winger, I don't think it's good for his development.

Not at all similar, Ribery is clearly better than him.

Zizou is a myth and young players still have a lot to go 1

In contrast, Ribery is a speedy winger, dribbling at times fancy, but extremely fast. Nasri played as a striker when he first debuted, but he was quite fast, and now he has basically changed to a forward midfielder, and his technique is more comprehensive and practical, but his speed and body are not good. It is a player belonging to practicality.

In terms of speed, Nasri is faster than Zizou. But it seems that this is the only one that is stronger than Zizou - Zizou's ball is called elegant, it's comfortable to watch, it's beautiful, and Nasri is still far behind.

Reminiscent of the era of Qizu and Feiluo. Now I feel that Ronaldo Messika is not as beautiful as Zizou, Fat Luo, Figo, Nedved in their time

However, it is almost impossible to reach the heights of Zizou, who is one of the few Grand Slam players......

Nasri is still in his infancy, not as good as Zidane for the time being.

The gap is huge, but the former is fast.

Let's talk about it in 5 years! Personally, I don't think it's comparable.

Far from it! He doesn't even dare to do Messi Kaka now, let alone Zizou.

Not to mention anything else, light stunts, Zizou has a Marseille maneuver. What's in Nasri?

The world is far behind Zidane only behind Maradona ahead of Pele Nasri has another good work.

First of all, the character Nasri is not good, and secondly, Qizu is a classical front waist, and the position is different, is there a classical front waist now? Nasri will compare Messi first.

It must be that Nasri is bigger, and in terms of technology, Nasri is more comprehensive than Ribery. On age, Nasri is younger than Ribery. Personally, I prefer Nasri's style, which is very smart and has a high football IQ.

Zidane Ribery is not in the same position as Zidane, he is more active on the wing.

Ribery has better technique.

Ribery is better.

Nasri has a lot of room for development It is difficult to say in the future.

They are not the same style of player at all.

Ribery is fast, full of energy, likes to break through the wings, can also form a threat in the middle, has a strong scoring ability, has some organizational ability, but cannot be the heart of the midfield.

Zizou is slow, delicate in technique, good at midfield organization and scheduling, has a good view of the overall situation, and has a certain ability to score at key moments, but he is by no means a scorer (which is not as good as Rivaldo in the era).

Forget about Benzema, he is in a slump at Real Madrid, and he is a striker, he is not similar to Zizou at all, he is closer to a Henry who has a good header, can grab points, and has slightly inferior skills.

Zidane, that belt is handsome, but Gattuso is the most handsome when he was a dance partner.

There is no comparison between the two of them. Zidane is a master, Nasri's level is worse than me, how can I compare with Zidane!

It's hard to be a master level person who needs a lot of talent plus experience around you, and there is only one football king, and you can't do it.

With a little time, it's possible! ·

According to the landlord's statement, it is normal for such a question to occur. This is because your original patch contains the player data you used in your previous matches, and your new patch contains the new player data. Obviously, if you're not mistaken, then your new patch shouldn't have Zidane's stats in it.

Generally, there should be Qi Zu in the live ten, and there should be in the original old if not in the active players, and some of the live versions of the original old characters are not all out at once, but in the second season or in the following seasons. In view of this, it is recommended that the landlord take a good look after the loss, if you really like Qi Zu, you can do it yourself, and if you want Fan Kongsen to feel troublesome, you can make the next latest transfer patch. Not a master, just trying to help you.

Of course, it is Gourcuff, Nasri is more inclined to play the wing, and Gourcuff is the one who plays in the midfield. Gourcuff has a stronger sense of the big picture and impact, and his height and weight are also better than Nasri's.

It's Ribery now, and the overall situation and passing awareness are very good, but it's ugly, hehe.

It's not like Nasri is not as good as Ben Arfa, he and Benzema in the youth team can win if they want to. Gurkuf: I feel a bit like Kaka.

It's not like it, but if you have to pick one, I think it's Nasri.

Nasri: But I think Ribery is more like that.