Can the J 7 be changed to a fighter like the European Tornado?

Exclude everything except missiles, even if you give an apron fcr....It's also completely impossible.

At most, the J-7 will be changed to super IDS. It is impossible to even surpass the F-15E.

Whether it can become a fighter or not depends on maneuverability and FCR, as well as the strength of the fuselage structure.

Although the J-7 has a word for destroying, it is a bomber itself. The air inlet is a typical subsonic air intake.

With the aerodynamic layout of the J-7 (similar to the minimum sweep angle of the Su-24 and IDS swept wings), the maneuverability is very poor, and if the speed is less than 500 km h, you jerk a lever to turn and ensure that you will be in an extremely painful state of change for the next few minutes. And with the Su-27, even if it is a 300km h pull rod, it is not very difficult to change it. For example, in order to suppress the enemy's anti-aircraft fire, after hitting the anti-radiation missile, it is necessary to disengage at full speed, and the F-35 can pull 9G to turn around and then retreat at full speed with very large acceleration, while the JH-7 needs to slowly and gently turn 180 degrees with the rod, which seriously reduces the survivability.

The performance of the aircraft is not a definite one-dimensional data, but a two-dimensional plane, and if you compare the IDS or Su-24 envelope with the Su-27 and F-15, you will find that the envelope of the former is completely covered by the latter.

As for the fire control radar, it is even more incomparable with the F-35 (of course, the current F35 is in a more chicken-catching state).

There is also the strength of the airframe, the fighter can generally withstand an overload of 8-9g, and the J-7 is definitely not good. In addition, modern air combat is increasingly emphasizing BVR, and emphasizing BVR requires emphasizing supersonic performance, which is the weakness of the JH-7. And then again, it is easy to reach 9G or even exceed 9G for the supersonic detractor, which is a great risk of disintegration for the JH-7.

As for the Tornado F3, it is at most an interceptor, not a fighter in the full sense of the word. Bombers like JH-7 with PL-12 missiles are purely for self-preservation, and the use is to give him one when someone's fighter comes to find trouble and then make a decisive U-turn, and people need to find a way to deal with missiles in order to avoid missiles, and they will postpone the pursuit of you, definitely not to fight for air supremacy, and it is impossible for the Su-24 or something to take the initiative to fight an air battle with the F-15.

In the final analysis, the type of mission was given at the time of design, and it was enough to do a good job of precision bombing and sea strikes. Just like the F-22, no matter how good it is, it will never do such a thing as running out of missiles and using a cannon to fight bayonets with a Shilka or Tunguska self-propelled anti-aircraft gun.

After all, if you can't make it, if you smash a Shilka, the enemy will lose up to 1 million, and if the F-22 is accidentally hit by the Shilka, it will be a devastating loss of one or two hundred million.

The competition of a single piece ** is of little significance,And you are still a comparison of different kinds of functions**,Personally, I think the advantage of JH7 is low-altitude and high-speed penetration,The function of air combat is like an additional function,It can be used,But it is not known if it is easy to use。

Clause. 1. The J-7 itself is a fighter-bomber, that is, it has the functions of both a fighter (fighter) and a bomber. Secondly, the combat effectiveness of the fighter is not only the first to be carried, the radar, aerodynamic layout, engine, and even the performance of the cockpit are all important factors that affect the combat effectiveness of the fighter.

From this point of view, the J-7 is far inferior to the F-35

Personally, I don't think it can't, first of all, it's a fighter-bomber, if you want to change it, it's a little reluctant, it's ground combat, China's latest research and development of CM-802AKG is suitable for it, as for what you said it's stronger than F35, I personally think it's a little inappropriate. If you want to know more about the J-7, you can watch the fourth issue of 2012, which is my personal opinion, and I hope that the predecessors.

First of all, this characterization is not very accurate, fighter is a general term for combat aircraft carrying ammunition, whether it is a fighter or a bomber, they are all fighters. Secondly, JH7 may not be able to configure PL10 and PL12, which involves compatibility issues, and it is necessary to have fire control radar and corresponding software support, PL10 and PL12 are designed for J10 and J11. The design of the JH7 at that time was ground-to-sea, so the radar was generally a ground-to-sea search radar, and the anti-air radar was relatively weak, and it was okay to bring some short-range air-to-air missiles for self-defense, but it was not possible to actively attack the air.

Your IQ is really urgent. It's completely impossible.

It is impossible to surpass the F35, according to the great god, you say so, the Indian MiG-21 can surpass the J-10 with a Rattlesnake???

<> "European Tornado" fighter.

Tornado is a twin-engine fighter jointly developed by Germany, Britain and Italy. The development of the Tornado began in 1970, its first flight took place in August 1974, and it was named the Tornado in September 1974. Panavia, which developed the Tornado fighter, is composed of three companies: Germany's Messerschmidt, British Aerospace, and Italy's Alannia.

The Tornado fighter features a tandem two-seater, variable-sweep overhang upper wing design. Two turbofan engines were installed side by side in the rear fuselage, and the air intakes were located on either side of the underwing fuselage. A speed brake is installed on each side of the upper part of the rear fuselage, which can be used in high-speed flight.

The two seats in the cockpit are arranged in a tandem front and rear, and both use Martin Baker ejection seats. There are several models of the Tornado, which also differ.

Taking the "Tornado" IDS as an example, in addition to a 27mm Mauser BK-27 cannon, it is armed with seven pylons under the fuselage and wings that can carry various missiles, Changlian late bombs, and rocket baggage-resistant bombs.

<> "European Tornado" fighter.

The Tornado fighter is a twin-engine fighter jointly developed by Germany, Britain and Italy, and made its first test flight in August 1974.

Basic parameters: fuselage length: meters.

Fuselage height: m.

Wingspan: m. Empty weight: 13890 kg.

Maximum speed: 2417 km/h.

The most callous long range: 3890 km.

Structural analysis: The "Tornado" fighter adopts a tandem two-seater, variable swept cantilever upper monoplane design. Two turbofan engines are installed side by side in the rear fuselage, and the air intakes are located on both sides of the fuselage under the dry wings.

A speed brake is mounted on each side of the rear upper part of the fuselage, which can be used in high-speed flight. The two seats in the cockpit are arranged in a tandem front and rear, and both are equipped with Martin Baker ejection seats.

Combat performance: There are several models of the Tornado fighter, which also vary. For example, in addition to the 27mm Mauser BK-27 cannon, the Nai-Lee "Tornado" IDS model is armed with seven pylons under the fuselage and wings that can carry various missiles, bombs and rockets.