The life of philosophy, the definition of life from a philosophical point of view

Which is weaker and which is stronger, how can it be judged casually? The ruler is short, and the inch is long. In the natural world, there is a chain of organisms.

But this biological chain, we eventually found that it is a relationship of mutual checks and balances. In the philosophy of the Chinese, it is to live and overcome each other. Mutual roots.

A tiger can be strong for a sheep. But a mosquito is a much more powerful thing for a tiger. But keep going on and you may find that a creature that is weak for sheep is strong for tigers.

So who is the strongest? High is an advantage, however, when both a mouse and an elephant are trapped in a room, the mouse can burrow and crawl out, but the elephant can't do anything about it. This is already a matter of near common sense.

Brother, it seems that you are very persistent? Shuncheon changed his life. Being aware of the cruel side of the world may be instructive in our lives, but exaggerating certain things is actually not conducive to our psychological development.

To put it bluntly, it's nothing more than death. It's nothing more than a powerful interest. Shakyamuni was originally a prince.

There's everything. But he saw death. He threw away everything he could get.

My brother must have called him a fool. Or maybe the brain is flooded. I don't know how many so-called heroes and heroes in this world are narrow-minded and confined to the interests of power and self-righteousness.

Actually? It's just an illusion in the universe. As the so-called Er Cao's body and name are destroyed, the rivers and rivers will not be wasted.

Let's look at the point! As a young person in the 21st century, you can't even see these truths clearly!

The inequality of life is not God, it is caused by nature, it lies in oneself, 'things are man-made', people are not strong, at least not at the beginning, and the wisdom is not outstanding, but they have to develop and continue to develop to this day, so it lies in themselves.

Equal at first.

Later ......Gradually, it changed.

Philosophical definition of life: life is a component of living things, the nature and ability of survival and development of living things, the consciousness of survival and development manifested by the growth, reproduction, metabolism, stress, evolution, movement and behavior of living things, and the concrete things and abstract things that human beings discover, define, manifest and extract from living things through cognitive and practical activities.

The essence of life: life is the product of conditions, from birth to growth, to aging, death, the completion of the whole process is always accompanied by various conditions, some conditions are blessed to continue life, and some conditions are to end life is a curse. Living in nature, society is in the midst of self-selection, natural selection is delayed, social choice.

Organisms are natural objects with life, survival consciousness, and survival performance. Life and biology are both opposed to each other and unified with each other, and life, survival and development performance, survival and development consciousness are the essence, simplicity, regulations and laws of living things, and are the components and constituent elements of living things.

Who am I? I'm from **? What is the meaning of life? ......

This is a philosophical question that mankind has been pondering. Different people gave different answers from different perspectives.

Some are pessimistic, some are optimistic. Some people think that everyone will experience birth, old age, sickness and death, so there is no point in living; Some people believe that existence is meaning, and enjoying a journey of life is a beautiful thing.

Just as some people think that "human nature is inherently evil" and some people think that "human nature is inherently good", pessimism and optimism are both feelings in people's hearts.

Schopenhauer was pessimistic, and so was Nietzsche. But their pessimism is different.

Schopenhauer was pure pessimism, he believed that life is a tragedy, life is not worth optimism, but we can only calmly accept all our encounters, and all the encounters we encounter must be encountered, everything that happens is bound to develop, and any seemingly small thing has its unchangeable inevitability.

Schopenhauer also proposed that there is nothing worth being happy in life, and even if happiness exists, happiness is very short-lived. Life is a mass of desires, and if desires cannot be satisfied, they will be miserable, and if they are satisfied, they will be bored, and life will oscillate between pain and boredom.

Nietzsche, who was influenced by Schopenhauer, was also a pessimistic person about life. However, his pessimism is different from Schopenhauer's, he affirms life on the premise of acknowledging the tragedy of life, establishes a positive stance towards the tragedy of life, puts forward the image of "superman", and focuses on solving the major problem of the meaning of life.

He adopted a positive attitude toward joining the WTO and affirming his life. He has been trying to find ways and means to solve his pain.

A true pessimist is not a person who escapes from pessimistic reality, they explore the causes of pessimism, face the pessimism of life, and their life is positive.

So since life is meaningless, how do we live?

I like Zhou Guoping's more on this issue, he said, "There are two ways, one is to find your own hobbies and hobbies, and you can use it to support yourself; The other is to find someone who is in love and can bring her joy. ”

That is, we either have something to be cute or someone is cute. Love is the meaning, with love we will not be lonely, we have the courage to face pain.