-
It's really hard to say, but China's national defense strength can easily destroy Japan.
The statement upstairs is very incorrect, according to your statement, China does not have aircraft carriers now, and Japan had aircraft carrier battle groups in World War II.
Also, the F22 was not in service in the 90s, it was finalized at the end of the 90s, just like the J10 was also finalized at the end of the 90s, and it was not mass-produced for large-scale equipment.
National defense strength is not just a simple assessment of ** equipment, or whether there is an aircraft carrier or not.
To refer to a country's comprehensive national strength and domestic production capacity, India also has aircraft carriers and advanced Su30MKI, but its national defense strength is not very good.
-
On average, this is the case.
The 70s of the 20th century in the United States.
Japan in the 80s of the 20th century.
The United States had a space shuttle in the 70s, and China does not have it now. The United States had aircraft carriers in World War II, and China does not have it now. The 90s in the United States.
The fourth-generation aircraft F22 is equipped with troops, and China's J20, which is not a real fourth-generation aircraft, is still flying and will be put into service in 15 years.
Most of the plants in Japan are now nuclear power plants, and there are only a few in China. Japan's energy development is advanced. Japan has *** aircraft carriers.
-
It's much more powerful than the United States is now, because we have people who can't die.
What is 30w, no, then 30w, who said it.
-
The Japanese were the first yellow people to defeat the white race. In a place as big as China, people use more than one million people to occupy almost half of China. In the Pacific War between the Japanese army and the U.S. military, the navy was also evenly matched with the U.S. military in the early days. The Air Force Zero fighter is a classic.
-
There are many reasons why Japan's soldiers make people feel strong, Japan is militaristic, and absolutely obeys the emperor's orders, and the second is that after World War II, Japan has given a lot of help, and high technology is developed, which is a great threat to China. Our history teacher said that if the Chinese were crowded in that small land and did not forge ahead, they would have been destroyed long ago
-
As far as ** is concerned, it should be able to reach the top 5 in the world, as far as China is concerned, this is not comparable, just like a 70-year-old man fighting with an adult in his 40s, and the adult still has ** in his hands.
-
If the United States does not limit Japan (although this is unlikely to happen, and the United States is not stupid) - Japan will have nuclear **;
Japan already has the ability to develop nuclear submarines, and as an island nation, it has a second-strike capability;
Japan's population base of 100 million can easily double and double the current 200,000 or so Self-Defense Forces;
Japan is now the third largest naval surface ship force in the world (the United States, Russia, and Japan), and the US military is inferior to itself in terms of anti-submarine forces, and its conventional submarine forces are comparable to Germany's technical and tactical level in the world, and its GDP is the third in the world, but its per capita is almost 10 times higher than that of China, and its air force combat power should not be underestimated, and the ground forces do not have to be compared, and they will not fight a ground war with China anyway.
The quality of the Japanese people and the centripetal force of the nation are extremely strong, in short, stronger than that of China at present.
You see, it's not easy for China to single out Japan, right?
-
It depends on how to say it, China has nuclear **, but Japan does not, but the international community can not use nuclear **, that is just a deterrent, China is not as good as Japan at sea, Japan is originally an island country, the development is sea power, the air force is almost all, but no matter how strong China is, it is a country that will only strongly condemn it, what can you expect from it, hehe. I hope to adopt.
-
Each has its own strengths and weaknesses.
-
Military power does not take into account nuclear **.
The Chinese Navy and Air Force are no match for Japan's Naval and Air Self-Defense Forces in terms of personnel training and equipment level.
Although the army is strong, the navy and air force have very poor long-range delivery capabilities, that is, they do not have the ability to launch landing operations on the main island of Japan.
The reality is that although it is called the Self-Defense Force, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force has become the second largest maritime military force after the United States, and the Air Self-Defense Force's fighter intact rate (that is, the number of fighters that can take off normally in wartime) is higher than that of the same number of U.S. military, that is, the world's first, and the level of pilot training is also higher than that of Chinese pilots.
Many people think that Japan's Self-Defense Forces are not worth mentioning because Japan has repeatedly emphasized the "US-Japan Security Treaty", but in fact this is not the case, because it is called the Self-Defense Forces, and only when others fight back can they fight back, you know. What Japan fears is that China will destroy China without declaring war like Japan's Pearl Harbor in World War II, so it has won over the United States ......
-
Strategic forces I come first; Army** quite; I am the first in the navy nuclear submarines, and the conventions are comparable; The Air Force is not counting the black silk that is about to be put into the army, and I am the first in the third-generation aircraft; The result is clear, and now it depends on the determination and decision to fight. Hope it helps! Modern warfare focuses on the system, and the satellite (Beidou, reconnaissance) system is incomparable to the devil.
-
Japan is a "self-defense" force, and China is a "liberation" army, you say.
-
As long as the United States is willing, the Japanese prime minister can be changed at will, who do you say is better in these two countries?
-
The United States is well equipped, and the Japanese have a strong mouth.
Paris is 49 degrees north latitude, and 49 degrees in China is already very far north, about Qiqihar or Nenjiang. >>>More
Japanese corporate positions are equivalent to Chinese positions >>>More
Jun Ji-hyun used to be quite popular in South Korea, equivalent to those occasional stars in China, such as twins, and now she is about 30 years old, she is changing careers, not the savage girlfriend she used to be, but broadening more drama paths, so it's a bit like Zhao Wei.
No. The U.S. is not the same as China.
China is a great unification, a strong regime, in charge of everything, and the provinces are just subordinate departments. The United States is developed from a dozen small colonies "huddled", it is a federal system, each state has a lot of independence (much more than our so-called autonomous regions), the United States federation ** and the states **, not a strict subordinate relationship, in addition to obeying the unified US Constitution, each state has its own set of legal system (now you know why there are so many lawyers in the United States!!). Governors are also self-elected. >>>More
Because China has a vast territory, the level of economic development in each region is different, so everyone's income level is also high and low, let's take the average salary in Beijing as an example, the average salary in Beijing in 1991 was yuan per month, and the average salary in Beijing in 2019 was 8847 yuan per month, about 37 times in 28 years, if you compare it according to the average salary in Beijing, then 10,000 yuan in 1991 is equivalent to 370,000 yuan now. >>>More