Help me look at grammatical errors... Exam today

It's not the same as programming.

1. Belonging to the National People's Congress.

2, it's not Chaohu Lake, Chaohu Lake is in Anhui, it's Dongting Lake.

3, that is, exempt from criminal punishment, provided that the person is found guilty after trial, and the non-criminal act does not have the premise 4, no, a large amount of hydrochloric acid even dissolves the kettle itself.

5. There is also an Arctic Ocean basin called the Irtysh River, which eventually flows into the Arctic Ocean.

1 Inflection conjunctive ending. It is generally expressed as interrupting the action or state that is currently being carried out and moving on to another action or state. (There is also a grammatical meaning, but I don't know very well, which is to make an emphasis on the subsidy, which is used as a demonstrative pronoun or later, to express emphasis).

2 ( Treat it as , and the same as , as a nominative particle, but with an emphatic meaning.)

3 ( indicates concession. Although the existing conditions are not good, or what should be possessed is not available, it is still necessary to settle for the meaning. It is equivalent to "even if ...... in ChineseAlso ......"Despite ......Also ......"Although ......But ......”

4 ( indicates concession. "Even if it's ......Also ......"Even if it's ......Also ......”

T1 is wrong with the use of syntax. The word that is wrong in t2 is his verb, and the word in front is the subject, which is obviously not right. The t4 syntax is used incorrectly, is out of context, and the ending cannot be in the past tense.

This question must have been chosen incorrectly, right? Only 1 is false, and the other three are correct.

1.Case-based particle, which means "to put.".Placed in....Above" such as: So the sentence should be changed to: It turns out that the file is at home.

2.It is added after the body word to indicate emphasis. Now you have to develop your own capabilities.

3.It is added after the body word to indicate concession, "even if, even if". But it's good to get second place.

4.It is added after the body word to indicate a concession, "although it is..."”。I was hungry last night, and (albeit was) instant noodles were cooked and eaten.

The first half of the sentence is generally fine.

But what it was expected to have is reserved.

First of all, IT is synonymous.

I believe it should refer to the materials

If so. They should be used

Moreover, it is more appropriate to use 'present tense' in the tense

Let's look at the whole phrase again.

In terms of the principle of minimal change.

There are two ways to express it.

One is to use when

i.e. till when they are expected to

The second is to use what

i.e. till what they are expected of

The sentence was originally "they are expected of sth", replaced by what and then adjusted at the beginning).

So instead of to, use of

As for major changes.

Please refer to the method of OXD BXO.

Slightly changed to. deterioration could cause the decrease in (the shortening of) the minimum performance period of building materials ，which means the materials will last shorter than they are expected.

or deterioration could decrease (shorten) the minimum performance period of building

materials ，which means the materials will last shorter than expected.

I hope that there will be experts to give advice on this issue.

Not is generally used in conjunction with until, although till and until are basically universal, but in the negative sentence it should be not....until...Let's set it up.

Not grammatically, but there is a problem with expression.

1.What deterioration causes?

to remove, directly use the decrease the minimum ......3.I feel that the period is not right, and it is recommended that time4Amend the latter sentence to read

which means that the materials could not work in regular/standard time.

It makes sense to add a of lead to and decreasing, and overall the sentence has no grammatical errors, but it translates rather stiffly. I think the following translation is more reasonable:

deterioration could cause decrease of minimum performance period of building materials ，which means the materials will last shorter than it is expected to.

It only represents personal opinions, please forgive me for any inappropriateness.