-
If the landlord is a beautiful woman recommended: Panasonic LX3GK (inch), Sony T700 (inch).
If the landlord is a handsome guy, it is recommended: Ricoh GX200 (inch), Canon G10 (inch).
Like what Nikon, Canon, Pentax is just full-frame SLR, APS-C format SLR, 4-3 system SLR is the best! The digital class can only be said to be average
And I don't want to discourage your enthusiasm The big screen means that it costs electricity, and it is a big trouble for travel shooting!
The following introductions are all powerful models:
The strongest comprehensive strength of consumer DC is still Sony's, like T300, T700....A lot
There is also the Panasonic TZ3, which won the EISA2007 Best Consumer Product DC last year, and of course, this year's Panasonic LX3GK is also quite outstanding!
The most famous is of course the Ricoh GRD-2, the lens is superb!
Of course, the strongest picture quality is the Sigma DP-1, which is close to the image quality of the SLR!
Of course, if you have rice, you can buy an aristocratic machine - Leica M8 drooling
Or the same sentence: DC is not MP4, not PMP, don't blindly pursue a large screen! The camera is based on image quality, and the image quality is subject to the lens & sensor! Remember!
-
The card machine is very dangerous. Not yet.
-
I feel like Sony's T700 is not bad either.
inch LCD screen, 4x zoom, double image stabilization, 4G memory (980 images can be stored by itself**), smiley shutter, post-repair. The style is also very good-looking, ultra-thin.
Or Nikon's S60, which is also an inch LCD screen.
But Sony's screen can be a little better.
-
Panasonic LX3,**Reference: 3700 This is much better than Canon, and it is an indispensable addition to the photographer's equipment.
-
1) Pixel: 980is = 14.7 million pixels, 870is = 1000 pixels "==870is is OK, 1000 pixels can wash A4 size photos 2) Sensitive chip: 980is = 1 inch, 870is = 1 inch "==980is is better.
3) Optical zoom: 980is = times, 870is = 4 times "==870is is better.
4) Focal length: 980is=36-133mm, 870is=28-112mm《==870is is better, because the wide angle is now better than the far angle.
5) Microcomputer zoom: 980is = not lower than 5 cm, 870is = not lower than 2 cm" == 870is is better, can shine on closer objects.
6) LCD screen: 980is = inch 230,000 pixels, 870is = 3 inches 230,000 pixels "==980 is finer, 870 is larger.
The rest of the data is more or less the same. Based on the above, I think the imaging function of the 870is is better, especially the 870is is the only model in the Canon IXUS series that supports a wide angle of 28mm.
-
Maintain the usual Canon characteristics.
Overall appearance of the Canon Ixus 870 IS (click to enlarge) The body size of the Canon Ixus 870 is millimeters and weighs 155g, which is not much different from the Canon Ixus 860 IS. The Canon Ixus 870 IS is available in both gold and silver versions, and the body color of this review model is gold, which looks more retro than the silver version. The curvature of the front panel of the fuselage is reduced compared to that of the IXUS 860 IS, and the design of the back buttons is more integrated.
The IXUS 870 IS is also designed with a metal body, which feels heavy in the hand, the back panel is brown, and the unique personalized button design also adds many fresh elements to the IXUS 870 IS.
Well, Canon Nikon is indeed a little stronger than other brands in the mid-to-high-end SLR, but it is not better than other Japanese cameras in the low-end card machine, among which Nikon's consumer camera performance in the Japanese domestic market is still slightly behind Sony, Panasonic, Canon, and Casio. >>>More
Samsung's i9220 is good, the screen is very big, and it's super domineering, you can consider it, oh, it's about 4200, and there's Lenovo, I don't know if I like it, and the machine is not bad.
I went to look for domestic ones, and I saw a lot of them.
Love to shoot masters, don't go online.
Haha, it must be "Wolong and Phoenix".
**Connect below. >>>More