Which is better, Canon 350D or Nikon D40? Help analyze it

Hello, these two cameras are outdated, you can consider Canon 1000d Canon 450d is better if you have to be one of these two, once 350d is a big shock in the photography industry, it is the beginning of the SLR in the photography industry, it is the plaything of many nobles, and it depends on your personal appreciation style, Canon's tone is soft and warm, of course, it is relative to Nikon It is not so soft and so warm as imagined, Nikon's sharpness is very high, and it has been photographed The highlights on the classmates' beards are just exaggerated, suitable for landscape architecture, Canon is suitable for all-round portrait landscapes From the point of view of parameters, there is no difference between the two products, both are beginner photography enthusiasts, and they are very sufficient.

But the 350 D has 7-point focus for easy framing and framing, a little more precisely.

Nikon is only 3 points and the frame is very large.

The workmanship is better than Nikon, and I personally prefer the internal performance of the Canon.

There is no big difference between pixels, Canon 8 million and Nikon 6 million, you can't see it with your eyes, the so-called pixels are**zoom size, it's all on the computer now** It won't be so big. Of course.

Accurate investigation or 800 makes people feel more comfortable, hehe.

First of all, both machines have been off the assembly line a long, long time ago.

The 350D is a 7-point focus, 8 million pixels.

The D40 is a 3-point focus, 6 million pixels.

All are plastic bodies, junior models.

If you want to buy a DSLR, you can now consider Canon 1000D (4500 yuan) and Nikon D60 (4100 yuan).

All of them are the current entry-level models.

The 350D is at least a serious DSLR (also with a Canon lens with a motor), the D40 and D40X are simplified machines, so forget it!

The D40 and D40X do not have a motor, so they cannot drive Nikon's AF-series AF lenses without a motor, and only Nikon's AF-S series lenses can be used! Let's buy a 350D! If you want to play Chase's manual head, you can also buy the D40X!

The main consideration for choosing a camera is the lens, and you can buy the body of whichever lens you like. As the saying goes, Nikon's wide-angle Canon's telephoto (just referring to the two companies having their own strengths, not that Nikon's telephoto or Canon's wide-angle are bad). It depends on what you're shooting.

In terms of body performance, it is meaningful to professionals, ordinary users and beginners do not have much significance, and most professional photographers are still using film SLR (the color reproduction and resolution of film are still higher than digital).

Nikon, Canon (or other brands) all have their advantages, but they also have their drawbacks. The needle has no two ends, and the words must be said at both ends. Nikon and Canon have to argue about who is higher and who is lower, and the argument will never end. It's up to you to see which one you like.

You can buy a 350D from the body alone, or you can buy any from the lens!

I think the 350D is better, I've used both, and I think the low-end SLR is good.

Let me tell you about it.

Which is better, Nikon or Canon, I won't say much, this is a topic that has been debated all the time and has no results. Let's take a brief comparison between the D3000 and the 450D. I won't paste any parameters, it's meaningless. I'm sure you've checked it too.

Now for the question, I will make two points:

1) The D3000 and 450D bodies do not have a focusing motor, and can only be autofocused on lenses with an autofocus motor, otherwise they can only focus manually. Nikon can autofocus the lens is not as much as Canon, except for the sleeve with a motor, it is several thousand larger, more expensive than the D3000 machine, if it is equipped with that cheap 50 small spittoon standard lens can not autofocus; Most of Canon's lenses are equipped with a focus motor, so you can choose from a wide range of cameras, and there is a lot of room for camera upgrades.

So what are the benefits of autofocus? For novices, manual focus is not a very easy thing, for example, when you find a wonderful moment, busy to manual focus, wonderful is fleeting, I am not here to say that manual is not good (quite a lot of top works are manual), but photography on the one hand to practice technology, in addition to convenience is another very important aspect, go out to travel, spend a lot of time manual focusing, tired. Others have long since run away with card machines and autofocus SLRs, hehe.

Putting the cart before the horse is not the purpose of traveling.

2) Live viewing, although for SLR, live view may not be as frequent as that used by card players, mainly relying on the viewfinder. But when using a tripod to shoot night scenes, macro shots, and portraits, this function comes into play. The D3000 does not have live view, the 450D does.

Since you fancy these two machines, they are positioned as entry-level machines. In addition to the jumper, the entry machine should also have a 50mm standard lens, to practice photography skills, standard lenses are essential, there are many photography masters, and they will only use standard lenses to take pictures for the rest of their lives. Therefore, it is recommended that if you buy a DSLR, you should add a 50 standard lens, which is not expensive, and Nikon Canon's are around 700.

Remember, you have to focus manually on the D3000 and auto on the 450D.

After comparison, you should be able to weigh which one to buy. However, it is important to remember that the machine is secondary, and even the entry-level SLR can shoot a good work, the key is to look at the head behind the camera. Hehe.

The ** of these two machines is about the same, novices, it is recommended to buy a 50 standard lens for the supporting machine, and it is no problem to get it within 5000, hehe.

Of course, if you have enough money, you don't have to worry about this, just go to the Nikon D90, or the Canon 550D.

The performance of these two is really not much different, you can choose which one according to the shape you like.

By the way, since I'm using Nikon right now, I'd go with the D3000 if I had to choose, it's purely a matter of personal preference.

There is not much gap in camera performance, the problem is to consider the factors that will be used to configure accessories such as lenses after getting started. If you want to develop at an advanced level, choose Canon, and if you want to use it yourself for practical results, choose Nikon. Because the mid-to-low-end lens is still Nikon's, it is more realistic.

Please consider carefully before you get started. Because if you want to change the door after entry, all the lenses also need to be replaced, and the loss is too great. Of course, if you already have a DSLR lens, you can only choose it inside the door.

This can also lead to significant savings.

These machines are entry-level, use Nikon D3000, the effect is good, and then use D90 when you are cooked

The Nikon D200 uses a 10.2 million pixel CCD sensor in a mm, APS-C format format with a lens magnification of the lens. The maximum resolution is 3872 and 100 200 400 800 1600. The shutter speed is 30 - 1 8000 seconds.

It also has an inch LCD display and an optical viewfinder with 95% coverage. Use a CF card as the storage medium. The battery system uses a lithium-ion battery with the model EN-EL3E.

The Nikon D200 weighs about 830 grams and has dimensions of 147 113 74mm.

Nikon D200 Key Performance Indicators:

1: A CCD sensor with 10.2 million effective pixels in APS-C format.

2: The body frame of the D200 is made of magnesium alloy, and it has the waterproof and dustproof ability that only the Canon 1D series has.

3: Brand new focusing system with 11 focus points.

4: The continuous shooting performance is improved by 5 frames per second, 54 shots at a time in JPEG format and 22 frames in RAW format.

5: The second generation of 3D color matrix multi-zone RGB metering sensor.

6: The camera start-up time is seconds, and the shutter lag is seconds.

7: The LCD display screen uses the mainstream inch TFT screen, with 230,000 pixels.

8: Finally ISO 100 with ISO range of 100-1600 (expandable to ISO 3200).

9: The built-in flash also has the function of wireless flash.

10: Specially set up "multi**", "panorama" function and black and white shooting mode.

Khan, the words are almost good, and they are really all written by themselves. It's pretty professional.,Buddy leave a QQ.,Add you.,Let's play photography together in the future.。

Words for a simple comparison:

Compare Nikon D80 and Canon 40D, the latter was launched a whole year later than the former, although both are quasi-professional SLRs at the level of tens of millions of pixels, but the technical update cannot be ignored, for example, the 40D display size is larger, 3 inches, D80 is inches, playback**, the difference in the size and effect of the display screen is still quite obvious;

**, the latter is nearly 2k more expensive, and the lens group of the latter is stronger than the former in other aspects.

One thing to note is that most of Nikon's SLRs do not have a driver motor, so if the level of the body is not enough, it is difficult to drive more advanced and high-end DX lenses, or it is difficult to play the efficiency of high-end lenses, while Canon does not have such a problem, that is, Canon can use a cheaper body, such as 400D, to drive all the red circle L lenses, which has no effect on the function of the lens.

As for**,Although the 40D** is slightly higher,But as I said,You can choose Canon's cheaper body,Use the rest of the money on the lens,After all, the lens is still the determining factor in **quality。 The choice of lens, the water is also relatively deep, if you are only used for tourism, do not pursue the quality of imaging, you can buy a suite, if you want a single lens, there is a lot of choice, there are many types, you need your specific requirements.

Going back to your question, mine is both, I've already said it before, but I recommend Canon more, as for which one is up to you.