Can Luo Zhenyu s debate speech in the 24th issue of Wonderful Stories move you?

I think that in terms of knowledge and logic, Mr. Luo Zhenyu still has a very strong foundation, and the debate is not just about things, but more of a kind of thinking development, can start from a topic, think from more aspects, and finally draw a conclusion, so I think it is still biased for what Brother Mi Tang said upstairs.

In fact, the process of human change is also a process of growth, we continue to maintain balance with the world at the same time, we will also change our views and attitudes, and finally grow into what kind of person, this person is likely to be the person we once hated, but the price of growth is not like this? Who can guarantee that nothing has changed in our growth, which we once couldn't see. I think that when we grow up with the things that make us angry, we will understand the deep meaning and maybe be able to accept them, and really understand that if I say that a person's mind has never changed, then I believe that this person must be naïve.

I'm annoyed when I look at him, nonsense, and sure enough, it's really disgusting to look like a learned person in a variety show, who is now young people are intellectually anxious and have a low IQ society.

Like the few upstairs, it didn't impress me, it's just so straightforward. Luo Zhenyu's speech in the debate of the 24th issue of Wonderful Sayings is undoubted, but it is embarrassing to come and replace Gao Xiaosong, but Gao Xiaosong has no doubt about the weight of the show "Wonderful Sayings", just like the previous six-year-old children for the classic Journey to the West, how good Luo Zhenyu is, I still think there are shortcomings.

Luo Zhenyu is very good and has a lot of outstanding features.

This is because he speaks very straight and does not beat around the bush, so he is liked.

His words and scolding people are targeted, and what he says is what many people want to say, so he is liked by everyone.

He has a peculiar vision of things and can always find different points of view and opinions from others.

A program is supported by guests and content. And the guests are often supported by thinking and logic. Luo Zhenyu still has some appeal as a ** person, which is also the premise of becoming a guest on the show.

Of course, his nickname Luo Fatzi should have his connotation and huge thinking in addition to his size. So Luo Fatzi has also become an honorable title.

On the other hand, the era of relying on novelty and bizarre rhetoric to attract attention has been overwhelmed by the tide of history. Even many guests who relied on fancy costumes to win attention began to take the connotation route. And Luo Zhenyu's own experience is very suitable for being a guest on this show, highly educated, thoughtful, and very good at expression.

I think this is also the meaning of Luo Zhenyu's strange words.

In terms of comprehensive programs, Luo Zhenyu's performance is basically qualified. But the results were not as wonderful as I expected.

Combined with the show itself, as a debate program, the contestants in the first few debates are using their own logic to make arguments. Of course, because the premise of the debate is to accept a conclusion and try to convince as many people as possible, it is result-oriented. Who can convince more people?

In addition,Debates are concluded first, followed by logic and emotion. From this point of view, emotion and logic are used to impress the audience. From this point of view, the first few debates put forward points of view and were-for-tat.

To a certain extent, the contestants who conclude the debate or call the final argument play the role of drawing the finishing touch, because the wonderful final argument speech can make the views of the previous debates more prominent, and the discussion is also more complete. This is also Luo Yuhao's position in the process of the wonderful show. Of course, in terms of the effect of the program and the debate process of the latest issue on whether to clarify, Luo Yuhao's role is very complete.

Luo Yuhao still has his own symbols in the show. Whether it is his tone, intonation or diction, it is very distinctive. For example, the most frequent is logic, just like the name of his show, logical thinking

Of course, Luo Zhenyu's status in the strange theory cannot be compared with Gao Xiaosong. It is not possible to add up and compare programs because they are in the same position. Everyone has their own characteristics, and it is very important to play with their own characteristics.

Luo Zhenyu continues to advocate logic and thinking in the show, and it will also become a new highlight of the show. I also hope that in future programs, Luo Zhenyu can continue to use his influence to promote his ideas in a balanced manner, and can change the world to provide a clear stream.

<> whether it is He Jiong or Luo Zhenyu, their performance in "Wonderful Story" is very bad.

If it is an audience who has not watched "Wonderful Story" for a long time or simply watched it because of the popularity of this show, they may not have much opinion on Luo Zhenyu.

But for most of the viewers of Jian Suifen's "Wonderful Sayings", Luo Zhenyu's joining is really bad.

Because he deviated from the principle that the previous show of "Wonderful Story" made everyone feel related, that is, whether it was laughing and scolding, or deviant, under every debate, at least you will have a feeling of poking your heart.

And the most taboo thing about this show is not Cai Kangyong-style chicken soup, not Gao Xiaosong-style nonsense, not Venus-style non-profoundness, nor Zhang Quanling-style warmth and dissipation. The most taboo thing about this show is He Jiong's style of playing a round, and it is Luo Zhenyu's strong twist logic.

For example, in the first issue, the topic of single mothers is discussed.

Luo Zhenyu ignored a very serious problem, that is, the audience of "Wonderful Sayings" is different from the audience of his "Logical Thinking".

Most of the audience of "Wonderful Story" is relatively young, and these audiences belong to the new generation of people. Don't think that you don't understand anything, that you just don't want to talk to you about these points head-on.

For example, straight male cancer, not that everyone can't see straight male cancer in disguise.

Luo Zhenyu used his own personal experience to discuss this point of view that a woman who has a child is a single mother, which can be said to have attracted the disgust and laughter of most audiences.