AMD 8 core bulldozer performance can surpass the i7 990x

Bulldozer. The competitor should be 2500K or 2600K, and it is generally speculated that the top of the bulldozer FX-8170 (8 cores, Turbo Core performance may not be comparable to 2600K. AMD has never had an advantage in terms of single cores, but in terms of multi-core and multi-threading.

, the difference between the FX-8170 and the 2600K should not be too big. This time AMD is doing floating-point arithmetic.

A lot of effort has been put into it, and the bulldozer's floating-point arithmetic will almost certainly exceed 2600K, which is comparable to 990X (AMD currently emits 4 double-precision instructions at the same time, while Intel has 3 single-precision and 1 double-precision). But the integer arithmetic is certainly not as good as the i7 2600k, and even though Bulldozer has two int pipes per core, the number of ALUs per int pipe has dropped from 6 to 4 in the previous generation. That said, the advantages of bulldozers over Sandy Bridge are not obvious in terms of multithreading, let alone single-threading.

More than 990x is even more impossible.

All in all, the direct competitors of the bulldozer are the 2500k and 2600k, and should not be compared to the 990x. Just look at the price difference: the bulldozer FX-8170 is around 270-320 US dollars, and the 990X is 8000 yuan.

AMD has always been racing this kind of horse racing.

AMD has never been a top-level CPU in recent years, and it can't afford it. But in the low-end side, AMD's price-performance ratio is obvious to all.

By the way, in my opinion, there is no need to buy 990x at all, unless you want to toss the computer with your heart, otherwise you basically can't feel the gap between 2600k and 990x. The 990x is even weaker than the 2600k in some games.

It's so stupid that you haven't used the i7, have you ? Hyper-threading is turned on, and the compression and transcoding are significantly faster, and the game fps is also nearly 10 improved.

Do you dare not compare the low-end of the i7 with the high-end of the i5?

Or the image point... NC in humans and NB in animals must be more sensible in animals. So people are more wasteful than animals? It's stupid.

AMD Ultra i7 990X Dream ah.

AMD's bulldozer is compared to the i7 2600K to meet the humility...

However, the single-core efficiency was still lost by the i7 2600k seconds hahaha the 4-core bulldozer and the 4 and i7 2600k do not open hyper-threading must i7 2600k win...

This is the gap between Intel and AMD...

Look at the market share of poor AMD is only about 10%... Everything else is basically Intel's...

Why AMD's Bulldozer will be close to the i5 2500K because that's how well it performs. Recall that in the P4 era, AMD performance surpassed Intel and how much AMD sold sky-high、。。

Now AMD's ** can't go up, it's a good proof that AMD performance is wasted...

The 990x is a 6-core, 12-thread, 8-core bulldozer that is far from decisive...

The top of the range models and i5 2500k in the bulldozer are close to 、。。 That means、。。

i7 can be played in i seconds, why? It's because of the multi-threading of i7's chicken ribs,The current game is generally optimized to 4 cores,But i7's multi-threading is to divide 4 cores into 8 cores,One person does the work of two people,Fool Xiaobai with it。

I digress, I personally think it should be about the same.

Last time, I saw the performance test of 8 cores and i7, in general, 8 cores Theoretically outstanding performance, workmanship is good, but in practical application, i7The performance is better than that of a bulldozer, which **, in the end, it has to appear in the use of i7 is better than Jue, using a bulldozer It feels like a chicken rib, and the performance can't be improved!

Baby. AMD didn't even dare to think about it. The FX8150 is expected to be at the level of 2500K, and it is 2600K when it is played well. If it is not a running party, the gap between the two is estimated to be between the two. 8 cores also have a little advantage in many tasks.

It should be close, maybe even a little lower.

As far as the current evaluation (it should be the ES version close to the official version), that is, to compare it with 2600k. and i7 990x....

990x 4000+ oceans.

AMD FX-8150 1800+ Ocean.

How to compare? This is to compare the speed of the Hornet with the Charger SRT-8... Can you run it?

You get what you pay for,AMD cost performance is high,But not unlimitedly high,8The default performance of the 8-core bulldozer is about the same as the actual experience of the i5,Of course, AMD overclocking is still good,But if you want to reach the level of the third generation i7,You still need to work hard。 The comparison of platforms not only depends on the CPU, but also on other aspects, such as the motherboard, graphics card, etc.

However, the 8-core bulldozer did not even dry the 1090t

That bulldozer is quad-core. It's called AMD X4 631

The CPU you're talking about isn't called a bulldozer, it's the same as the i5.

Personally, I think that the advantages between these two types of U are different, depending on which aspects of performance users value more, there is not much comparison!

It's that AMD's process is not good enough, the money is not enough for Intel, and after i5, AMD is basically incomparable, but AMD is the first to propose 64-bit and multi-core, in the dual-core period, many people like AMD, it readjusts the architecture to dual-core, not just embedding two cores on the circuit board. Actually, AMD is good, without AMD you can't use the i5 now

Not ......

AMD's single-core performance is far inferior to Intel's.

I heard that AMD FX 8-core is at the level of the Core i5. And that power consumption is also large.

I've also heard that AMD's CPUs don't perform well in physics and aren't good for gaming.

There are many factors that determine performance, there are the number of cores, the architecture, the frequency, etc., and the poor performance of a single core of AMD is mainly due to the lower architecture execution rate than Intel.

Since you take the i5 and AMD are better than the AMD8 core, the same configuration, the game time is faster than the i5, the web page is opened, and the decompression is fast. If you don't believe me, compare two computers from a friend near you. In the end, I am not lying, computers can talk.

Do you run the score .It's just a joke...Speed of reaction is king.

I want to say again, it's actually faster than the i7, don't lift the cylinder, if you don't believe it, compare it.

Obviously not a grade·· i7 990x six cores and twelve threads·· The computer identified it as 12 cores (12 cores · · Horror)

1L is also a good thing to say, AMD's U is basically just a bunch of cores now·· 8 cores can't beat someone else's 4 cores (i5 2500k overclocking fx 8150).

And now the latest is not 990x, it's 3960x...

AMD's range of bulldozers. A little stronger than the i5 and weaker than the i7.

The i7's 6-core CPU, whether it is 1st or 2nd generation, is a one-of-a-kind experience.

AMD used to be 6 cores and i5 quad-cores, and now AMD is 8 cores and i5 second-generation quad-cores.

It's not a grade at all, how can it be compared to 990X, which is a physical 6-box virtual 12-box CPU, and the price is there.

The performance of the bulldozer is not much different from the i5 2500k, what happened to 8 boxes, but it can't do 4 boxes.

The Bulldozer 8 core performance is about 2 times that of the 1100T, ** at only $320, which would be devastating for the entire i7 series if true.

However, Intel will not sit still, it has already been developed"3D transistors"CPU, the production process has reached 22nm. From this point of view, a new round of CPU wars is coming.

Here's a report, you take a look at 1!!

The i7 980X's architectural advantages have been strongly demonstrated at the top end, while the bulldozer is still in the product testing stage, and the jury is still out on how well its new parallel wrapping architecture will perform. And it's too strong to adjust the computing power of the number end, which feels a bit off. Moreover, Intel has suppressed AMD for so many years, and the latter has not been able to turn over, and it feels so difficult to fight a product with a hypothetical architecture to turn over.

Why don't you send a bulldozer to kill the i7 ** upstairs, the landlord can rest assured, the bulldozer is AMD's bargaining chip to turn over, and I'm not sure it won't be listed. Isn't the K8 era also completely better than Intel, and everything is now a floating cloud.

Hey, I can't lift my energy when I hear the bulldozer! Single-core performance is not as good as its own fat dragon6 core,,Don't talk about winning,It's good to have a tie with i5,And one is** Now Jingdong and** are in stock But that**。。。

The bulldozer is a product of Intel, don't make a mistake, discuss for a long time, and laugh off the foreigner's big teeth.

AMD's high-end is not good in the first place, and now it is not good in the low-end.

Even the strongest bulldozer FX8120 is only a little stronger than the 2500K, and the 2600K is a few streets away from him! The specific Zhongguancun and Pacific Ocean have been evaluated in detail for a while, so you can go and see it!

In terms of ordinary applications alone, AMD's performance is basically enough, so we can only take the cost-effective route to confront Intel with the strategy of Tian Ji horse racing, not to mention that now Intel's X79 LGA2011 platform has been listed, AMD is not a little behind.

i7,The bulldozer just added a core graphics card with a price comparison,The CPU performance inside has not changed,But the process has been changed to32nm,It is estimated that the heat control is better than before,A and i are not comparable,AU lags behind the IU generation architecture,The key depends on what you do with it。

What seconds are not seconds, all day long, you know seconds, seconds, Intel is so powerful, everything is seconds? My most bs is the one who says the second to the night, the i7 is better than the bulldozer, the good is not a little bit, the gap between the two dynasties.

Pretty sure you listen! i7 Benefits! i5 2nd generation is a spike bulldozer!

The i7 2600K is much more powerful

The bulldozer overclocking is okay, but the heat is huge.

AMD Bulldozer i7**i5 flight performance, 8 cores equivalent to i5 2500K