AMD3000 is faster than P 3 0

The AMD3000+ is a bit better.

AMD's frequency is worse than Intel's, and the nominal 3000+ refers to the actual performance achieved.

But AMD's CPU architecture is much better than Intel's.

Intel is just blindly increasing the frequency to increase the speed, Intel is now also focusing on architecture, hyper-threading (i.e., virtual dual-core) and dual-core processors (PD) both reflect this, but AMD adopted dual-core before him, and it is structurally superior, even claiming that Intel's dual-core is pseudo-dual-core.

The advantages of the architecture can be seen from the best home processor IBM Power G5, which has only frequency, but the performance is much higher than that of Intel and AMD processors, which is only the advantage of the architecture.

In conclusion, Intel's frequency is indeed higher than AMD's, but performance may prevail.

It should be about the same, but it actually corresponds to the AMD3000+

But AMD is doing better, so it's comparable.

P4 yes, it should be better for P4, and the AMD3000+ is good in some ways.

AMD is the first choice for gaming

That's what I think.,As long as it's good at playing games.,Then the rest isn't all a piece of cake.。。。

Are you right?

I think now the AMD300+ should be better than the P4. Personal opinion.

Almost,AMD's 3000+ means it's about the same as P4 3G,Generally speaking, AMD's gameplay is slightly better。

Personal opinion: AMD 3000+ is a little better with short response time, good gaming performance, and high frequency and low energy of Pentium. Hehe.

There seem to be several kinds of Ben 4 or 3.0, and the different performance is different.

AMD3000+: Do you ask Athlon or Flashdragon?

If it is a speed dragon, then the three thousand plus is better than Ben Si, if it is a flash dragon, the performance is not as good as Ben Si.

When buying a machine, in addition to considering the performance, it is also necessary to consider the entire balance.

At present, it is generally believed that Bensi plus Intel's original chipset has advantages in office applications and processing.

AMD's U and VIA's chipsets work together to have great strengths in gaming and 3D processing.

Personally, I think that the current change of Intel's CPU to the contact type is to send the probability of CPU damage to the motherboard, and because of the design, the power consumption cannot be reduced, but it has not been able to have a good performance. So, in the current situation, will not buy.

I don't think it's easy for AMD to work with NF chipsets, and I think that NVD companies have not been in the chipset market for a long time, and the considerable technical precipitation is not enough, and in terms of compatibility and stability, it can't be compared with VIA.

If there is a difference, please discuss it.

I also think Ben 4 is better.

It should depend on your requirements, there is no best processor in the world.

3000+ good! Go to the computer city and ask, the power consumption and heat generation are not ordinary! High-frequency and low-energy, ultra-long assembly line!

Saying that 3000+ is unstable is a fart, and stable and unstable is not just for CPUs! Unless you use a copycat-level motherboard, it will still crash with a copycat motherboard! 3000+ is 64 bits, is 32 bits!

Use CPU-Z to see how much more than 3000+ supports more than the multi** instruction set! That aspect is better than 3000+!

The AMD3000+ is fast and enjoyable to play big games, but if other configurations are not good, it may overheat and crash. Ben 4 has good comprehensive performance and good compatibility performance. However, for general customer applications, there is not much difference between the two.

Your mentality is not suitable for overclocking, overclocking 1 depends on the CPU physique, 2 looks at the motherboard and also looks at the memory.

However, AMD3000+ is very good when it comes to more than two o'clock, and it is more slim to want to go to 3G, unless you get some of the god U.

Every CPU is different. Can someone overclock the CPU to 335MHz

But mine can only go beyond 267MHz, which is equivalent to a frequency of 3800+ .

Look at the hardware performance.

Your AMD 3000 is better than the C4 in both FlashDragon and Athlon.

It must be 3000+ strong.

The Shining Dragon's is also stronger than C.

The AND3000 is good, but the fan cooling is good.

Of course, the cost performance is AMD, in fact, the performance is similar.

Now advocating energy saving, but the performance can not be inferior, AMD is your first choice.

Preferably amd2.

AMD3000+, if you want to use it for 1-2 years, you can buy Yingtai motherboard (cheap), and if you want to use it for 5-10 years to be stable and not have an accident, you can buy ASUS motherboard. The interface of 939 is bought NF4 ASUS. 754 interface to buy NF3 ASUS.

Distinguish it among me.

It's about the same CPU, but if you ask me to choose from these two CPUs, I choose P4, although it's an old CPU, but as long as it matches the motherboard, the performance is still good, of course, it can't be compared with the current CPU...

It's not about garbage, this CPU was a terrible CPU a few years ago, the computer hardware is updated too fast, this pace will never be able to catch up, so, as long as your computer feels enough, with the right match, good maintenance, then it is not garbage until the day it falls!

The Athlon 3000 is better, the Ben 4 office performance seems to be better, the game performance is not as good, the power consumption is high, and the efficiency is low.

This depends on your own positioning.,Can't say in general terms whether she's garbage or not.,I'll use P42,4The guest rate is lower than yours.,But it's not slow.,AMD's heat is much bigger than Intel.,Small dots burned off on hot days.。

AMD 3000, of course.

AMD 3000 is slightly more powerful than the former.

But because the architecture is advanced.

It is better than the former in terms of heat generation and power consumption.

The former is the old architecture of the past, and it cannot be compared with the K8 architecture.

The latter is also higher than the main frequency performance because of the architecture.