What is the AMD 3000 equivalent to Celeron? 10

Theoretically, AMD Athlon64 3000+ is equivalent to, comparable to, in fact slightly inferior. The frequency of AMD 3000+ is about the same. If you use Win XP, you will definitely use AMD Athlon64 or P4 well, in terms of dealing with multi-** and other aspects.

In terms of arithmetic, it is still good at p4. It's better to play games or amd.

There is no way to compare the AMD 3000+ with the Celeron D at the same frequency, and AMD is definitely better.

The processing speed is about the same as that of P4! Without overclocking, the performance is similar to that of Celeron! It also depends on what platform you use, if the platform is good, AMD3000+ can be on! If you are a gamer, we recommend using AMD

The Sembleon in AMD is the equivalent of Celeron in Intel. The main frequency of Sempron 3000+ is 1.6GIf you don't understand anything, don't blow it up!

Equivalent to Celeron's 2 G points. AMD's models are not based on the main frequency. It is named after the corresponding Intel product.

The game is much stronger.

3000 is equivalent to the meaning.

p4 top -

Probably P4 is the most handsome single-core.

I also use AMD Athlon64 3000+, which feels pretty good.

1. For AMD, its most popular place is its good overclocking performance and low price**, which is the fundamental reason why it currently occupies the market share of processors, and it is also its advantage. When we choose, if we are DIY masters, then it is definitely right to choose AMD, you can get better performance for less money.

2, Intel is known for its stability, has good instruction support for many **, and is more suitable for some ** enthusiasts, office machines, and some home machines that don't know much about computers.

3,**In the case of the same performance, Intel's processor can be regarded as high compared to AMD, although you get what you pay for, but there is also a certain monopoly factor in it, but its excellent and stable performance makes many computer enthusiasts still set it as the first choice when they install it. It is precisely because of its stability that many brands of computers mostly use Intel's processors.

First, this question is asked in a more general way, AMD processor is the full name of AMD, including a variety of CPUs. And Celeron is the lowest-grade processor in Intel.

Second, if you compare AMD's mid-to-high-end processors with Celeron, AMD is naturally better. For example, AMD's A10 and FX bulldozer series are sure to be much better in the race.

But if you take AMD's low-end brands, Sempron and A4 compared with Celeron, it is naturally better than Celeron.

3. Classification of current popular CPUs: (clear at a glance).

1. Notebook processors Celeron and AMD, it's really hard to say, because Celeron is the lowest grade in Intel processors, but AMD has many types of processors, and there is a big difference between high and low grades.

Second, the high-end and mid-grade AMD processors must be better in the competition. But the low-grade AMD processor naturally has to compete poorly.

3. Classification comparison of current popular CPUs:

Let's start by correcting this statement. Celeron is a series of INTE chip CPUs, and AMD is a brand of CPUs. So it's like asking which is better, iPhone4s or Samsung, and there is no way to answer this.

Celeron is a product of Intel in the early years, and it is now almost obsolete, and the models of AMD and Celeron at the same time are about AMD3000+ and 2600+

At present, AMD has dual-core, 4-core, A10 chips, and Inte has Core i3 i5 i7 at the same level.

There are fewer Celeron notebooks, right?,It's generally core.,If you don't have a separate graphics card, choose AMD.。

If you support your own country, you should choose AMD, and the CEO of AMD is an overseas Chinese.

Can you explain the model number of Intel Celeron(R) to ask?1 What is a Celeron processor? Everyone knows the Pentium processor, from the earliest Pentium to the current Pentium 4, which is the P4 processor.

These processors are the products that Intel Corporation pushes on mainstream price point machines, and their prices are relatively high. However, in order to meet the needs of the low-cost and large-capacity market, Intel had to launch low-cost processor products, so the Celeron processor was born.

2 What is the difference between Celeron processors and Pentium processors? Celeron processors are identical to Pentium processors in terms of compute cores, except that the size of the L2 cache is different. The L2 cache size of the existing desktop processor P4 is 512KB, while the L2 cache size of the P4 Celeron is 128KB.

The L2 cache size of the Pentium M processor used in laptops is 1MB, and the L2 cache size of the new Celeron M processor is 512KB, which is the same as that of P4. The Pentium M and Celeron M processors are the same except for the L2 cache size.

3 What are the features of the new Celeron M processor The new Celeron M processor is a simplified version of the Pentium M processor (commonly known as the Centrino processor), which reduces the L2 cache of the Pentium M processor by half, and the rest is exactly the same as the Pentium M processor. In addition, in order to distinguish between the two processors, Intel has lowered the operating frequency of Celeron M processors a bit, and the current highest frequency is. Since then, the Celeron M processor has always been lower than the mainstream Centrino processor.

This is due to Intel's product policy.

4 The difference between Celeron M processor and Celeron processor The difference between the new Celeron M processor and P4 Celeron is: First of all, the processor core is different, one is the core of Centrino (Celeron M), and the other is the core of P4 (P4 Celeron), so in terms of data operation efficiency, Celeron M is much stronger than P4 Celeron, which can be described as a natural beauty. The second is that the L2 cache is different.

Celeron M's L2 cache is 512KB, which is equivalent to the L2 cache size of mainstream P4 processors today, while P4 Celeron's L2 cache is only 128KB, which is very small. According to the previous statement, its operating efficiency will be much lower than that of the game. So the Celeron M processor will be much stronger than the P4 Celeron.

5 Comparison between Celeron M processor and Pentium 4 processor The difference between Celeron M processor and P4 processor is in two places: One is that the two cores are different, one is the core of Centrino, and the other is the core of P4. In this way, of course, the core of the Centrino operates efficiently, consumes less energy, and generates less heat.

Second, the energy-saving technologies used by the two are different. Celeron M uses the same energy-saving technology as Centrino, so it lasts longer than the P4M's battery. The L2 cache capacity of Celeron M is the same as that of P4, and its core operation efficiency is higher than that of P4, so its actual performance is better than that of P4 processors of the same frequency.

Coupled with a reasonable **, the user is actually buying a better processor.