Why did the villa where the woman hadn t lived for many years become the filming location of the cre

Film and television dramas have a demand for framing, and there is a market for the demand side. The villa has not been lived in for many years, the manager is greedy for profit, the management is not perfect, and there is a supply side.

Because the woman entrusted the house to the property management company to take care of after buying the house, she did not move in, so she was taken by someone with a heart to make a profit.

1.improper property management; 2.The woman bought the villa by herself and did not move in and did not manage it, which caused some departments to take advantage of it.

The crew is greedy and cheap, and they don't want to rent other people's villas, and they use it directly when they see a villa that no one lives in.

The villa that the woman has not lived in for many years will become the filming location of the crew because the developer is greedy for profit, so the house is rented to the crew for filming without the woman's permission!

First of all, because the woman works outside all the year round and hasn't been home for a long time, the property doesn't think it's a big deal, and then this villa is a very good attraction, so it will become the filming location of the crew.

It is obvious that the property was rented to the crew privately while the owner was away. and concealed the truth, thinking that the main family would not find out. The crew has all the scenes and items needed for filming, dozens of people can work at the same time, and renting a villa is also a common thing.

There are really strange things in this society, the house I bought has never been lived in, but someone else lived in it first, and I don't know it. There are a lot of things that you think are impossible, but they are real. The luxury villa purchased by a woman in Hangzhou was rented to others to film TV series without knowing it, and the case entered the second trial, but the result made Ms. Lin not very satisfied.

Ms. Lin has been working and living in Hangzhou, and bought a villa in her hometown in her early years, which was a model house installed by the developer at that time, and the decoration was very luxurious. After the purchase, Ms. Lin did not move in, but handed over the keys to the property, and she returned to Hangzhou to work. What Ms. Lin didn't expect was that she saw this villa again on TV, and it turned out that the property and the developer rented the house to the crew behind her back to shoot TV.

Ms. Lin was so angry that she took the developer and crew to court.

1. The defendant in the first trial did not infringe. During the filming, the crew caused a loss to the house and the things inside, and the crew recognized this part of the loss, and the developer and the property also recognized it. However, both parties denied that their actions constituted an infringement of privacy, so the first instance only sentenced the two parties to compensate Ms. Lin for more than 300,000 yuan, but did not convict the two parties of infringement.

Second, in the second instance, the focus of the dispute between the two parties is still on whether privacy is violated. Ms. Lin insisted on suing the other party for infringement, and the focus of the dispute in the second instance was still here. Ms. Lin felt that entering the house without her consent was an invasion of privacy, while the playwright thought that Ms. Lin had never lived in the house and did not step into the issue of privacy.

3. I hope that the court can give a fair judgment. I personally support Ms. Lin, if the defendant wins the case this time, then anyone who has never lived in a house can be filmed or rented to others in the future. The house is privately owned, as long as you enter, it involves privacy, and it doesn't matter if anyone else has lived in it, I hope the court will have a fair verdict.

The latest progress of the case has been claimed from the filmmaker of "About Love", and they also agreed to compensate the woman 200,000, but the woman was not happy and is still entangled.

A few days ago, the second trial was held, and there are still many issues, and the issue of privacy is still being debated.

In the end, the court ruled that the program team did not violate privacy, so it rejected the woman's application, and then the woman said that she would continue to appeal in the future.

At present, it is still in the state of litigation, and there is no clear news of the result, and the law will definitely give a fair and just result.

The latest development is that the woman was compensated accordingly, and the woman's legal rights and privacy rights were violated, and the woman won the lawsuit.

The latest development is that the woman is asking for 3 million in compensation. and the appeal platform removed the relevant TV series from the shelves. It should be successful.

At present, there has not been a final settlement, and now it is in the process of fighting the lawsuit, the first trial is over, and now it has entered the second trial.

In the end, the results of the second instance have been announced, and the lawsuit has been fought for more than two years, and then I feel that this matter does not constitute a particularly serious invasion of privacy.

At present, the lawsuit is still in the process of being filed, and the result has not yet been completely decided, and I believe that the law will definitely give a fair and just result.

Whose fault is it that the crew encroached on the villa---

This matter is indeed very interesting, according to the news I watched myself, Ms. Lin bought a villa in her hometown, and she didn't go back to watch it for several years, and recently she saw others "living" in her own villa in a TV series. I don't know that Ms. Lin is living on TV. <>

According to Ms. Lin's own account, she gave the key to her villa to the property management company when she left, so that they could maintain the villa regularly. However, his house was filmed in a TV series, which is a bit unbelievable. Later, Ms. Lin urgently returned to the villa to check the situation and found that many things in her hardcover villa had been damaged.

Elevators, fingerprint locks are broken and replaced. She then sued the producers of these shows, but the lawyer's letter was rejected.

Personally, I think the core of this problem lies with the property management company, because the property management company is responsible for this. The TV drama company also entered the villa through the property, and they decided that it was impossible to break into the house privately. So to figure out the relationship here, you still have to find the property.

The author believes that the producer must of course bear certain legal responsibilities, and it is impossible not to strip it clean. Because they did not fully understand the ownership of the filming location, they illegally signed an agreement with the property management company without seeing Ms. Lin's entrustment contract at that time. Most of the responsibility is, of course, borne by the property management company.

We all know that property companies are difficult to deal with. In our country, it is not known how many owners are on the road to fight with property companies every day. When will the state be able to introduce some policies to rectify the property company industry and bring benefits to these owners?

I can only sympathize with Ms. Lin's situation, this must be a big guy who is not bad for money. I was really surprised that a villa could sit for a couple of years without going to live in. That's not bad for money!

Or what's the deal behind this villa It's not known. Of course, in the end, I hope that Ms. Lin's problem can be solved perfectly.

If the crew can prove that they did not know, it is a trespass and should bear secondary responsibility. If there is evidence of knowledge, then the main responsibility is the same as that of the property.

When the crew chooses a filming location, if it is a legal location owned by others, they should follow the consent of others, and it is illegal to not follow the consent of others.

Before entering the villa, the crew was approved by the community property, and also paid a certain amount of tens of thousands of yuan to the community property, and the villa owner's house is a model house, so the crew's behavior is in line with legal standards and is reasonable.

Using other people's villas as filming locations without the consent of the owner, this behavior of the crew is an infringement of the private property rights of others, and the owner is also suing the producer for compensation through legal channels.

No, the crew will definitely negotiate and communicate with the owner of the villa in advance, and requisition your villa, you should have money to collect. If the crew shoots without the consent of the villa owner, the owner sues the crew.

No, in our country, trespassing on their homes without their consent is illegal and requires legal responsibility.

It seems that yes, this owner seems to have been defending his rights for more than a year, but there is still no result, and he has been very popular recently by netizens.

Yes, because the owner of the villa only found out that his villa was rented out as a filming venue when he was watching a TV series, it can be said that the owner of the villa did not know in advance.

Ms. Lin, who lives and works in Hangzhou, bought a luxury villa in her hometown five years ago and has never been back since. Last year, Ms. Lin occasionally saw on a popular TV series that the heroine's home in the play was very familiar, and everyone in the play was eating and sleeping in the villa. If you look closely, it turns out to be your own villa.

In October 2019, Ms. Lin went back to the villa to count, at that time she bought a model house, and immediately handed over the key to the property, so there was an inventory when she received the house, and now she will do a correspondence: an elevator in the house is damaged and cannot be started, the fingerprint lock is damaged, the luxury silk scarf and all the carpets are defaced, many furniture is worn, and decorative paintings, projections, tableware, etc. are missing.

In desperation, Ms. Lin sueed. Ms. Lin demanded that the three defendants of Ningbo Film and Television, Wutong Property and iQiyi apologize and jointly and severally compensate for the corresponding losses, and demanded that Ningbo Film and Television and iQiyi completely stop broadcasting and delete the infringing TV series.

The crew's behavior is already illegal, and if someone doesn't live in a house, it doesn't mean that they can enter someone else's house to film without authorization, if there is communication in advance and pay the corresponding fees, it is not illegal.

Of course, because they did not obtain the right to use the owner, such behavior will definitely be severely punished by the law.

Breaking the law, the crew should not enter the filming "without permission", strictly speaking, this is trespassing on a private house.

When the woman was chasing the drama, she suddenly found that the villa where the heroine lived in the play was very similar to the villa she bought many years ago, and it was later confirmed that it was really her villa.

There are indeed many bizarreities in this incident, each has its own opinions, each has its own version, and both sides feel that they have done nothing wrong, and it was with the permission of others, so it is currently in the process of investigation.

They just thought that this was just a model house, so after simply communicating with the sales staff and the developer, they went to the villa to settle in and shoot a TV series for seven days, and after this incident, the owner of the villa also asked the TV crew to take off the shelves and shoot the relevant scenes in the villa, but there is no result yet, I think the property should bear the main responsibility for this incident, because he rented the house to the crew.

The main problem is in the property, the owner just asked the property to help open the windows for ventilation, while the property let the crew come in to shoot.

This problem may be due to the fact that the woman has not lived in her own villa for many years, so that the crew has formed the wrong idea that the villa has no owner and no one to manage it, so that they think that they can use it themselves.

It's clear that something is wrong with the property. In order to earn money, the property rented the villa to the crew for filming.

First, my villa was not taken care of, and the house had to be cleaned and ventilated if I didn't live for a long time. Second, if you hit the burglar alarm device, or monitoring, you can also avoid such a thing. Thirdly, the property ignores the owner and does not fulfill its responsibilities.