How do astronomers study the formation of the universe?

Many Westerners believe that the earth and sky were created by the supernatural 6,000 years ago (and many still believe in this conclusion, although in doing so their intellect looks the same as those who believe that the earth is flat). In any case, most scientists now accept the fact that the solar system was formed 4.6 billion years ago by a natural process of dust and gas clouds, and that these clouds may have existed since the universe was formed 15 billion years ago. At the beginning of the universe, for the first 300,000 years after the birth of space-time, the universe was opaque.

As protons and electrons combine to form atoms, radiation can pass freely, and an observable universe is formed. But if we go back to the time of the big ** and assume that all the matter and energy of the universe is concentrated in a fairly dense ball, and this ball is very hot, and it happens** to form the universe, then where does this ball come from? How did it come to be?

Do we have to assume that there was supernatural creation at this stage? Not necessarily, scientists introduced a discipline called quantum mechanics in 1920, and it was so complex that we can't explain it here. This is a very successful theory, which properly explains phenomena that other theories cannot explain, and can also ** new phenomena, and ** new phenomena are exactly the same as what actually happens.

In 1980, an American physicist Alain. Guji began to use quantum mechanics to study the question of the origin of the Great **. We can assume that before the big ** happened, the universe was a huge glowing sea in which nothing existed.

Obviously, this description is inaccurate, these do not contain energy, so it is not a vacuum, because by definition there should be nothing in a vacuum. The pre-universe contained energy, but all of its components were similar to those of a vacuum, so it was called a false vacuum. In this false vacuum, a tiny particle exists where there is energy, and it is formed by an aimless force that changes irregularly.

In fact, we can think of this glowing false vacuum as a foamy bubble that can produce a small piece of existence here or there, like foam produced by ocean waves. Some of these beings soon vanished, returning to a false vacuum; And some, on the contrary, become very large or form an object like the universe after a large **. We live in such a bubble of success.

But this model has a lot of problems, and scientists have been making up for and solving them. If they solve this problem, wouldn't we have a better perspective on where the universe came from? Of course, if part of the Gusi theory is correct, we can simply go back and ask where the energy of the false vacuum came from in the first place.

We can't say that, but it doesn't help us to prove the existence of the supernatural, because we can go back a step and ask where the supernatural matter came from. The answer to this question is shocking, i.e. "it doesn't come from anywhere, it always exists that way".

The universe is too large to study uselessly, it's all there to speculate and talk nonsense, just like ants discussing the Milky Way