Why are Chinese not keen on adventure, and why are people keen on exploration

LS two nonsense.

The driving force of exploration is profit-driven and satisfying the strong human thirst for knowledge.

However, I believe that ideology and politics have also told you that knowledge is a luxury, and the premise and most basic thing is to sustain life.

That is, the original drive of exploration is to survive, and the ancestors of the Chinese are to survive, constantly exploring, constantly migrating to find food and water sources and coming to China from Africa, that is, when the resources are more scarce, the more people explore for livelihood.

Why Europe loves adventure more than the Chinese.

1, at that time, Europe was not rich in material, the kingdoms were relatively poor, and the land was small, so many people took risks to leave the land and seek a livelihood at sea, China was relatively rich in materials, and China was large, immigrants did not have to run to the sea, do not forget that the Han people were all over the country, and the Han people were only part of the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River during the Yan and Huang periods, not where did immigrants come from such a land in the past.

2. Europe's economic and technological backwardness will naturally drive them to seek exchanges with China, which is first-class in science and technology and economy; And it is precisely because of China's first-class economic and technological development that it will disdain to communicate with those barbarians, thinking that it is an act of self-surrender, which cannot be blamed, if you would also be willing to communicate with the United States more than to Africa.

That's why Europeans are keen on exploration, while Chinese don't like to explore.

Of course, since the late Ming Dynasty, many Chinese have traveled to various countries to seek livelihoods in order to make a living, but they have not received ** support and protection like Western European countries, so they are just a group of vulnerable groups.

If I have money, less work pressure, and less life pressure, then I will definitely go, and being keen may not be able to do it.

Chinese have no money, there are still many people, and most of the beautiful places have become protected areas, and if you go, you have to spend money, and some beautiful places are called ** lies made into profits.

Z is still exploring without living, life is an adventure.

Adventure is a biological legacy.

Why do people love to take risks? As the understanding continues to deepen, the answer gradually becomes clear - human beings are driven by profit to take risks; The more willing you are to take risks, the more likely you are to become stronger. Jay Fran, a biologist at the University of California in the United States, recently proposed a theory that has been recognized.

He believes that this adventurous habit of human beings originated in prehistoric times. At that time, there were two major groups of primitive people living on the earth, one nesting and settling, and the other daring to open up new horizons. Settlers mostly stay in their nests, living on the surrounding plants and small animals, and are always cautious.

In addition, they have accumulated a wealth of survival experience and are better able to withstand the rigors of nature. These more skilled doers tend to live longer and raise many children, thus successfully passing on their genes to the next generation until people like them eventually become dominant in the human race.

As a result, the love of adventure is a biological heritage of humanity, and the habitual love of adventure has been inherited and is still prevalent today. It's hard to deny that the brain sees risk-taking behavior as a powerful sign.