What did the low level knights of the European Middle Ages think of the Crusaders?

Let's start with the knights. Knight first refers to the medieval soldiers who were specially trained to serve the nobles and kings, loyalty and bravery are their life mottos, trained they will move forward bravely in war, in order to protect the master will not flinch, and chivalry has also become a virtue respected by the nobles in the Middle Ages, and even formed a unique culture, known as "knight culture". So, what kind of existence are crusaders?

Crusaders are also a type of knighthood, although they are made up of Catholic soldiers, recruit devout Catholics from among the knights, and are named after the special cross they wear.

The Crusaders played a huge role in the Crusades of the Middle Ages, and their own knightly origin, combined with their religious beliefs, made them more fanatical than the average knight, and they were more courageous in protecting pilgrims, saving slaves, and fighting for wealth and land—perhaps the main difference between a crusader and an ordinary knight.

Among the knights, the opinion of the crusaders is basically more positive, after all, in the Middle Ages, which advocated loyalty and bravery, the crusaders were superior in both faith and combat effectiveness, which is widely recognized. If it is an unknown little knight at the bottom, he should be full of envy and longing for the crusaders, right?

I think as a low-level knight should really want to join the Crusaders, after all, the status of the Crusaders is higher, so they will join without hesitation.

Personally, I feel that the enterprises at the bottom of the European Middle Ages should not join the crusaders without hesitation, because the crusaders are a group of more fanatical religious believers, and the knights will have their own thoughts and ideas. Won't give up easily.

The status of the crusaders was quite high, and the knights at that time admired the crusaders very much, and if the low-level soldiers also believed in Catholicism, then they would definitely join the crusaders without hesitation.

I feel like the knights of the Middle Ages. They looked down on the Crusaders. Knights are generally the embodiment of justice, and will not invade other countries like the Crusaders.

Every country has its own beliefs, for the sake of the country, I feel that they will join, everyone has a sense of national honor and disgrace, for the sake of the country, in order to protect the homeland of each of us, will join.

Crusaders are also knights, but not every knight can become a crusader, and it takes a very brave knight to become a crusader, so ordinary knights respect crusaders very much.

At that time, the European monarchy was divinely granted, and the church power was monstrous, and the knights at the bottom should be very envious of the crusaders, and becoming a crusader not only increased their status, but also robbed a lot of wealth in the hands of the Arabs, but it was very difficult to become a crusader, and it was necessary to consider the origin, martial arts, and beliefs, so the low-level talents who could not become a crusader organized a pilgrimage to Jerusalem.

Yes, bloody men will always stand up when the country is in danger, just like our country's soldiers, firefighters, **need**. The state is the territory they defend, and no one can infringe.

Most of the knights have one thing in common: blindness, foolishness, and the worship of force, and many are still white. So they all follow blindly and have no opinions of their own.

A group of people who went to pagan areas to rob and kill people legally, and also glorified to save their souls.

If you are canonized as a knight, even if you enter the aristocratic class, the knight is generally canonized by the king or lord, there are two kinds of knights, one is the Shichai Ming Pei, the other is lifelong, the king's choice of knights is mostly hereditary, and there are also brave fighters and outstanding contributions to be canonized as knights.

On the top of the riding tassel are barons, viscounts, earls, marquises, dukes, among which marquises, dukes, are generally canonized by members of the royal family.

It is an absolute honor to be canonized as a knight, <>

The European Middle Ages refers to a historical period from the decline of the Western Roman Empire to the pre-Renaissance movement, which lasted approximately from the 5th century to the 15th century AD. During this period, Europe underwent many political, social, cultural, and economic changes and transformations, including the expansion of the influence of the Roman Catholic Church, the establishment of feudalism, the Crusades, and other important events.

The knightly class refers to a special social class in the European Middle Ages, who usually fought in wars to gain wealth and honor as a way to increase their status and prestige. The knightly class consisted mainly of guerrilla combatants, who usually wore armor and rode horses, and possessed strong ** and combat skills. The knightly class had a fairly high status in the society of medieval Europe, and was seen as a symbol of dignity and bravery, and many nobles and members of the royal family were once members of the knightly class.

The knightly class usually follows some codes of conduct and morality, such as bravery, honesty, generosity, etiquette, etc., these codes are known as the spirit of knighthood, which has a profound impact on shaping the image and values of the knightly class. The Orange Class played an important role in the political, economic, and cultural development of Europe in the Middle Ages, leaving a deep mark on European history.

In the Middle Ages, the pope and secular rulers jointly organized armies to suppress the "heretical" movement of peoples against feudalism and the Catholic Church. 1096 In 1291, the famous "Crusades" (named after the red cross on their uniforms) were launched, and chivalric culture flourished. The knights were an important force in these repressive wars, and they were the lowest class of the ruling class in the Middle Ages.

The Crusades are famous in history, with several crusades to recapture the Holy Land of Jerusalem. However, the end result was a failure.

Question 1: At that time, only the eldest son of the nobles could inherit the mantle, and the others could only be sent to the monastery to become monks, and the son of a knight, regardless of whether he belonged to the nobility, could only be after inheriting his father's knighthood The training of knights should have been cultivated from an early age, and the heirs of the children would be trained from an early age in combat, horsemanship, etc.!

Question 2: When you are a knight, only the king or duke who named you or even the great nobles are the objects of your allegiance, such as the down-and-out knights and the knights of the wandering side can choose their allegiance, but generally speaking, since King Arthur, there have been many knights of the wandering side, but they will return to the king's flag when the king is in his most critical situation, and there is no time limit for his allegiance, because since a knight is loyal, then what he has to swear to him is to swear allegiance to this person forever!

Problem 3: Chivalry leads because it's a hardcore rule that knights have to follow!

Due to the different local traditions, just take France as an example.

1.The eldest son can inherit, and as for the other sons, it depends on whether you are a descendant of a landed knight or a landless knight. If you don't have land, you become a civilian.

2.To whom your land belongs, you will be allegiant. As for the wandering knights who have no land, they are free to choose who they are loyal to.

3.According to chivalry, the choice is to be loyal to the person who gives you the fiefdom. Of course, not all knights follow this spirit.