Does learning to apply well help with interviews?

I think that learning how to apply well is very helpful for interviews.

Although the essay is an important part of the civil service written examination, mastering the answering strategies in the essay will also make you better in the interview.

The number of civil servants interviewed is large, and the rigor and rigor requirements are high, so generally speaking, the interviews are more structured interviews. This kind of interview mainly examines the candidate's language expression ability and logical thinking ability. It can even be said that the interview process is not strictly required to use flowery language, but what you must do is to explain all the knowledge points involved.

Looking at the types of civil service interview questions in recent years, the scenario simulation questions test our adaptability, the comic questions test our thinking divergence ability, and the comprehensive analysis questions pay more attention to the examination of our logical ability and knowledge reserve ability.

No matter what type of question, we can easily find that this requires us to have a clear grasp of the national situation, provincial situation and even local market conditions, and all the interview question types are an extension of the policy document.

In the process of learning and declaring, we also need to master many important policy documents and leadership speeches. It has to be said that the spirit of these policy documents and leaders' speeches is the weather vane and the method that guides us to discuss and solve all problems.

And learning to argue well can just cultivate our ability to summarize. A lot of seemingly unrelated materials always revolve around a main line. Through the study of deuteronomy, we know that all issues have a central idea.

Therefore, in the interview answers, we also pay more attention to refining the main idea of the question, and also pay attention to our own discourse around the central idea.

Therefore, except for the gap between speaking and writing, there is almost no difference between the essay and the interview.

Helpful. Essentially, both the essay and the interview allow the candidate to discuss their views on a certain policy, a certain point of view, a certain phenomenon, the background reasons, the solution strategy, and so on. The difference is only in the form of the examination, the essay is examined in written form, and the interview is examined orally.

An important factor to consider in evaluating the candidate's interview level is the logic of expression, that is, the candidate's should be hierarchical and methodical, rather than eloquent and confusing. Logic is also the key to getting a high score in the essay topic, especially the essay essay. The most important thing in essay writing is that the essay is hierarchical, logical, and framing, and the language expression is standardized and concise, and it does not require outstanding writing, which is the main difference from middle school composition.

Therefore, the process of preparing for the essay is also a kind of exercise for the logic of expressing opinions, and this kind of thinking exercise is also beneficial for the interview.

Another key factor for candidates to get a high score in an interview is to have content. It is necessary to have an opinion that can stand up to scrutiny, to have arguments to prove the point, and to establish a connection between the argument and the opinion. The so-called opinions, arguments, examples, etc., are also needed in argument writing.

The process of preparing for the essay is actually the process of accumulating materials for the interview.

Finally, the actual preparation time for the interview is often very short, and the written test results are only about a month from the start of the interview. In a month's time, it is not easy to achieve fluent language, clear logic, rich and high-quality content. In the process of preparing for the exam, I deliberately strengthened the exercise of thinking logic and paid attention to the accumulation of materials, which can effectively reduce the difficulty of preparing for the interview in a period of time.

An essay is similar to an interview, that is, analyzing the problem, solving the problem, and clarifying the point. But the interview is more systematic, more comprehensive, and more difficult than the argument. Therefore, the help of the essay for the interview is limited.

Candidates also need to take the interview seriously, understand the interview correctly, and master the correct study and practice methods in order to win in the fierce competition. Nowadays, most candidates still have misunderstandings about the study of interviews, and always wait for the interview to study and prepare for the interview, and some candidates will apply for an interview class after an interview, in the final analysis, they don't understand the interview at all, and they don't master the method. Nowadays, many interview classes are just to make money, what to do 3-day classes, 7-day classes, guaranteed classes, 3 days and 7 days, that is, to understand the process and practice simply, there will be no improvement at all.

Passing the class is also just playing probability, relying on a lot of practice to train candidates to speak, there is quantity but not quality. I've helped some candidates who have spent a lot of money outside to study for interview classes, and I feel that this field is mixed. Those ten minutes in the examination room are actually what kind of person you are in the usual test!

As far as the argument is concerned, the material is the main reference for our answers, and without the material, our questions will become water without a source and a tree without roots. So today, I will explain to you how to efficiently and quickly select the key points in the materials in our essay exam.

To find the score points from the material, we must first read the question, the purpose of reading the question is actually very simple, that is, to know what the questioner is asking and what we are looking for when we return to the material, so how to choose the main points in the material? I hope my answer will be helpful to you.

The basic principle to follow in the answer is what to ask, and the principle that the material is king, that is, we must carefully examine the question, determine the answer idea from the question stem, and then return to the material to find the answer.

There is no trick to answering arguments, the key is that after you have mastered the skills of answering questions in an internal way, you can do it.

Consolidation is done with lots of practice.

？It is estimated that ninety-nine out of a hundred people will shake their heads above you.

The essay test is actually a kind of test that simulates the work of an exemplary civil servant, mainly through the candidate's analysis, generalization, refinement, and processing of the given material, and tests the candidate's reading comprehension ability, comprehensive analysis ability, ability to propose and solve problems, and written expression ability.

The foundation of reading comprehension ability, its cultivation process is a process of quantitative change to qualitative change, that is, through a large amount of reading and accumulation, when you see some language and words, you will naturally think of its literal meaning and deep meaning, and with the increase of your own reading, the speed of reading may change freely, and you can grasp the time well when skimming and intensive reading of the argument material.

Therefore, if you want to do well in the essay, you must work hard before the exam.

The slow method is to read more news and newspapers on weekdays to grasp the hot spots; Do more real questions, how to solve the questions and scoring skills; Read more books, accumulate a lot of money, and sooner or later you will have strong reading skills; ......

Of course, you can also take some shortcuts and look for some exam tips to shorten the learning process.

10.(Popular Science) (hook class, send materials and handwritten argument answers) Public examination interview Q&A, will there be an advantage in the interview of people with good arguments?

1. Write a neat and clear hand.

The answers in the essay examination are all computer-marked, and candidates are required to answer neatly, clearly and beautifully. Nowadays, candidates usually have their own writing habits and form their own fonts, but in the process of marking the exam, the marking teacher often can't recognize them, which is easy to lead to the main points being written, but because the examiner does not recognize and recognize them, they lose points. We can practice a copybook every day, in order to facilitate the preparation of students, the publication of "Zhonggong copybook" is a good choice, that is, to improve the standardization of our writing, neatness, but also in the process of practicing fonts to accumulate famous sayings, aphorisms, good beginnings, ends and other materials.

We can also be in peacetime; When practicing, there is a "grid spirit", and use manuscript paper or professional answer sheet to write to form a neat and clear font.

2. Read poems, news, and materials often.

First, ancient poetry is a treasure of our culture, and it also contains some truths, and the use of ancient poetry in the process of writing essays will increase the literary brilliance and also increase the persuasiveness. Second, we should also have the habit of reading the news, the specific timeliness and extensiveness of the argument material, the news is part of the argument material, and the reading of the news can help us understand the core theme of the material during the exam, and can help us better present the main points. Third, we can understand the direction and angle of the essay materials by reading the past past questions, and accumulate them to understand the examiner's thinking about the questions, and be able to think from the perspective of the questioner, and get the answers that the questioner wants to see.

We accumulate a piece of material every day and take good notes, not greedy, but we must remember it firmly, understand it thoroughly, and do a good job in the basic skills of argument learning, which starts from reading bit by bit.

Third, the practice of writing is indispensable.

The argument material has a lot of words and is relatively boring, and many students only mark the main points in the material and determine the knowledge mastery of the answers, and save time at the same time. However, this is a misunderstanding of the preparation of the essay exam, the essay exam has strict requirements for the number of words, according to the number of words, the details of the main points presented are also different, and the key points drawn out in the materials should be deleted, and the number of words should not be mastered in place. Therefore, it is important to keep practicing the pen.

1. A notebook, insist on writing a notebook every day.

2. An accumulation book, accumulation of cases and materials.

3. A manuscript on paper, practice standard writing every day and week.

1. The key is to put forward countermeasures, question types, and review questions. When it comes to reviewing questions, many students will feel that the question stem is very short, and you can read it quickly without paying too much attention. The questioner also grasped the psychology of the candidates, and often set up some traps in the examination process, so that the majority of candidates were recruited unconsciously.

To give you an example, the stem is expressed as follows: given the information that mentions the main problems encountered by a city in the census work, assuming that you are a census taker, please suggest specific measures to solve these problems. From the perspective of the stem alone, it is true that we can directly propose solutions to the problem, but let's take a look at the requirements again:

The problems are clear, the measures are appropriate and targeted. Write in sections, no more than 300 words. After reading the requirements, we will find that it is not enough to simply ask questions, we also have to summarize the problems briefly.

Therefore, when we review the questions, we can't sort out the materials after reading the questions, and sometimes the answer requirements will also point us in the direction of the answer.

Web Links.