Is the military integration of Western Europe, the military integration of the European Union?

Next week's Introduction to International Relations class will talk about the topic of military integration in Western Europe. Can you help? Thank you.

I have a better answer.

Bold. Drifting red.

Symbol. Numbering.

Typesetting. **。

Annex. Map.

On the surface, it is military integration, but it is all led by the United States.

As a matter of fact, because the EU has always preferred to be an organization dominated by economic integration, France hopes to exclude the United States' military integration plan for the alliance, and the progress has not been as good as that of NATO's military integration led by the United States. And they are all very different in terms of development ideas.

However, in fact, the military integration of most of the developed countries in Western Europe has been completed, mainly because of the military alliances that have always existed in the European member states of the NATO military integration organization (to which France does not belong to the world) and the process of military integration that has evolved over the decades.

Citation: The organizational structure of NATO forces mainly consists of one and multinational forces, as well as their related combat commands. The command organizational structure is mainly engaged in the command and control of joint military operations within strategic and semi-strategic regions. The organizational structure of NATO forces is mainly engaged in the command and control of specific combat units within the tactical scope.

According to the new structure, NATO forces should be able to be deployed quickly to any critical area of the world and have a certain level of sustained combat performance, i.e., be able to carry out corresponding combat operations both within and outside NATO territory.

The European Union is a Europe that has experienced the overall weakening of the world after World War II and was divided by two major military blocs, and the Europeans understand that only European cooperation can create a new future for Europe. The landlord must see this big premise. 1 The Anglo-French Alliance and the Weimar Triangle have been formed within Europe, but Europeans should seek a larger alliance to challenge the hegemony of the United States of America and to maintain security in the region, and to play a leading role in the region.

In my opinion, European military integration should be completed in about 20 years, mainly in the hope that US dominance will decline significantly in 20 years. After completion, NATO will cease to exist, NATO has long lost its historical role, and the disappearance of NATO will really loosen Europe's bonds. 2 The EU is an imperfect organization, and it has forced countries together when there are still large differences in their economic conditions, so their problems will mainly focus on the leadership of the EU and the distribution of rights.

3 Britain and France in the EU have nuclear **, and it is not surprising that Germany has this capability. 4 They are each other's largest partners, I personally feel that many companies in Europe need technical support from the United States, in other words, Europe has some technology ahead of the world, but on the whole, it seems that they are all under the United States. 5. The economic strength is not surprisingly the United States, and the country's economic strength must be exerted, it must look at the international status of its currency and the country's ability to use it, that is, to see the control ability of ****.

The cornerstone of the world's economy is the dollar, the euro is only one of the challengers, and Europe does not yet have a unified and efficient **, which can be seen from the fact that Europeans do not have a lot of basic scientific research on future research and development.

On the surface, it is military integration, but it is all led by the United States.

In fact, because the EU has always preferred to be an organization dominated by economic integration, the EU military integration plan that France hopes to exclude from the United States has not progressed as well as the US-led NATO military integration. And they are all very different in terms of development ideas.

However, in fact most of the developed countries in Western Europe.

Military integration has been completed, mainly in the context of the military alliances that have always existed in the European member states of NATO, to which France does not belong and the process of military integration that has evolved over the decades.

Citation: Organizational structure of NATO forces.

It consists mainly of one and multinational forces, as well as their associated operational commands. At the hierarchical level, the command organizational structure is divided into the organizational structure of the command and the organizational structure of the troops, and the command organizational structure is mainly engaged in joint military operations within the scope of strategic and semi-strategic regions.

command and control; The organizational structure of NATO forces is mainly engaged in the command and control of specific combat units within the tactical scope. According to the new structural concept, NATO forces should be able to be quickly deployed to any critical area of the world and have a certain level of sustained combat performance, i.e., be able to carry out corresponding combat operations both within and outside NATO territory.