Which Sennheiser MX 560, MX 365, CX200 or AKG K313, K321 sound quality?

Hello landlord, in these headphones, the quality of K321 is very good, recommended consideration. First of all, the K321 quality is relatively versatile, and it can be competent for various genres. The three frequencies are relatively good.

The K321 is relatively cost-effective, and at this price, the performance of the K321 is still very satisfactory. Revert, parse, these are all well done. Compared with the other headphones that the landlord said, K321 should be a little more prominent, I hope it will be helpful to the landlord.

U5 is considered to be in this F price rangeP7The sound quality is good。 Sennheiser is a big Z brand, but AKG is not a Shenma K Y village, and T is a big X brand, but it is not as loud as Senhai. Therefore, the same price of 5akg is definitely higher than that of 5 Senhai 5.

Look at your budget, I don't recommend you to buy MX210, Sen also has many classic models, MX050, OMX10, MX00, these are better than 3MX660 This K price is only K357 and K435 can be 1 to choose, K401 is more expensive than 0, to three x four hundred, but listen to the classical is a god plug, very awesome 8. I think you have this H price, you can 3 look at the domestic brand earbuds, only RO8 zombie QPR500 or 2 Sonic's plug T, these stoppers X quality is also X is not wrong, the plug E characteristics also G meet your requirements, listen to the pop is very powerful F. If you have to buy a foreign brand F, we recommend you AKG K233, which can fully meet your requirements.

As for those parameters, the impedance is the overall resistance of the headphones, which parameters are basically useless, and the sound quality is all based on listening. In addition, buy earbuds on r**, buy a price similar to k, not p to buy in a digital store. will be pitted a lot of money.

Buy on ** on d o not f to be greedy to buy very cheap, the kind is very cheap, it must be a cottage.

The AKG K420 is an open headset with a better soundstage, and the sound is more slimmer, and the overall in-ear earbuds are much better than the Sennheiser CX200.

Model AKG K420

Wearing style: over-the-head.

Functional use: Game audio-visual.

The unit diameter is 40mm

The frequency response range is 13-27000Hz

The impedance of the product is 32 ohms.

Sensitivity 125db

The rated power is 30MW

Headphone plug plug (straight, gold-plated).

Other parameters. Earphone cable shape design product color: classic blue, dark blue, light blue, red, orange, green product weight 105g

Headset accessories. Packing list AKG K420 X1

Headphone pouch x1

Model Sennheiser CX200

Product type: dynamic headphones.

Wearing style: in-ear.

Functional uses: gaming audio, video, iPod headphones.

The frequency response range is 20-20000Hz

The product impedance is 16 ohms.

Sensitivity 110db

Total harmonic distortion

Headphone plug plug.

Other parameters. The weight of the earphone cable product is 5g

Headphones in the same price range should sound better than earbuds in the same price range, which is a must! The CX200 bass is relatively strong, but this kind of bass is muddy, and you will understand it if you have heard the big headphones! There is also better sound insulation!

K420 is more all-in-one, it is more suitable to listen to all kinds of **, and the bass is not bad, I personally recommend it!

The CX200 bass is not as good as the K420, the treble CX200 is thinner, and the K420 is more neutral. CX200 feels lighter, listen to popular advice K420. The resolution feels like K420 is better.

But if you have the conditions, it is recommended to try it out and see for yourself, and it is best if you like it.

Senhai MX360 is more suitable for you.

Quoting the evaluation of Lin S in Beijing's Lin family shop (don't say I copy,Personally, I think this is a very intuitive comparison,After all, it's the same low-end,The positioning is the same,There's no need to be too demanding,Putting aside the headphones to compare and suit yourself is the most important thing):

1. Let's talk about high frequency first: both are lower body players, and the high-frequency extension and smoothness of the two are basically equal, but K315's detail performance obviously has the upper hand, and MX360 is dark, scattered, and a lot of details are erased. The K315 is slightly better.

2. In terms of mid-frequency: MX360 vocals are more forward, warmer, looser and thicker; And K315 belongs to the soft and rigid sound, which has an obvious sense of bone in comparison, and there is no lack of warm colors. Of course, I've said it many times - the problem with 360 is that his tuning is too popular and loses the sense of line, and for the midrange, this scattered and warm tuning results in poor vocal resolution, and most of the singer's breath and teeth are masked - of course, it is not excluded that some people prefer such a sound K315 wins in this section.

3. Low-frequency comparison: MX360 is obviously larger (which is also one of the reasons why it is hot), while K315 wins in elasticity and diving, and resolution. Draw.

4. Sound field comparison: MX360 wins horizontally, loses vertically, and the sense of envelopment is inferior to K315, but the larger sound field causes it to be relatively calm when dealing with large scenes. MX360 wins by a small margin.

5. Positioning level: The positioning of MX360 is slightly floating, K315 is slightly better, and the layering MX360 wins with the help of the lateral sound field advantage. All in all, this is a draw.

Summary: MX360 is very balanced, and the three-frequency response is enough to deal with pop, and the sound field is good; But it was scattered and mixed.

K315 is also balanced, low frequency and mid frequency are better, the tuning belongs to a comfortable retro analog sound, and the sound field is small and the high frequency is almost a pity.

These two earbuds are tied in terms of listening to pop songs like Wang Feng, Xu Wei, Jay Chou, etc., but the three-frequency balanced MX360 is better in terms of pure **.

So I recommend Senhai MX360, I also have one, I feel very good.

In other words, the positioning of these two headphones is not at the same level... I've really heard of both headphones (the K315 is my own).

1.Personally, I think MX581 is cost-effective, although compared with the general entry-level headphones, it has advantages in the balance of the three frequencies and resolution, but the medium frequency is not as good as the MX470, and the low frequency is even inferior to the MX370, and in terms of the width of the sound field and the coordination of the three frequencies, it is not far from the MX760 I commonly use.

The resolution is very average; In terms of disadvantages, the amount of low-frequency diving is insufficient, but it is more textured; The midrange is definitely the highlight, and the vocal effect is outstanding in the same class of headphones; The high-frequency performance is not very similar to the booth (probably sacrificed to highlight the midrange).

Generally speaking, given that you like to listen to some popular ones that pay more attention to the singer's own voice and emotional expression**, then K315 is recommended among these two headphones, and relatively speaking, this model is also more cost-effective.

Finally, if you can still buy the MX760, then I recommend you try this one, which is also very suitable for the ** you said ** (I haven't heard of the successor MX880, but it is said that it is not as good as the 760).

I have one of them, and after personal use, I feel that its characteristics are as follows: the overall resolution is very average; In terms of low-frequency diving, the amount is insufficient, but it is more textured; The midrange is definitely the highlight, and the vocal effect is outstanding in the headphones of the same grade; High-end performance is not very good (sacrificed to highlight the midrange).

I've heard from friends, the resolution is also very average, and the sound field is not wide enough; The low frequency is remarkable (the personal feeling is that the quantity is greater than the quality); The mid-frequency is also said to be too spikey, and the high frequency is more rubbish.

I tried it in the store, and the initial feeling was that the mid and high frequencies were the highlights, but the low frequencies were completely scrapped (and the 370 in reverse?). ）。

I haven't really heard of it, but it is said that this model is not distinctive, and the voice is full of caution and muffled.

Overall:Personally, I think that among these models, K315 is more suitable for you,The higher vocal positioning of the type family is easy to please the ear,The better middle and low frequency is also more suitable for the sound performance of most European and American pop singers,And the appearance design of this headset is also excellent。