Why is Zheng Yujiao overly defensive? 15

I don't understand the judgment of **, if it comes to legitimate defense, does the heroine still have the ability to defend? Can there still be legitimate defense? It is no wonder that the legitimate rights and interests of women cannot be protected.

It is not surprising that China has the power to be above the law if it has money.

This judgment is also reasonable, if everyone kills each other because the other person violated him, then it is not allowed.

This is China, what do you think?

Poking the person into the incapacitated and unable to die, then it can be considered legitimate defense.

But in that case, people who are a little bloody can't be controlled, how can they be calculated so accurately.

How can the little common people be innocent?

Only when a man wants to kill a woman can a woman defend herself with a knife. It's just that the vast majority of defense at this time can only accelerate the death of the woman herself.

Of course, it is not completely justifiable defense.

How can you tell? The scene of a weak woman at that time was about to fall into the tiger's mouth, and I don't think it would be too good to defend it! The judge thinks again: If it is your own mother and sister, how to deal with this kind of scene? Martyrdom is the best title!!

Of course, it was not justified defense. The sorrow of the law, the people have no right to interpret the law.

No is there any doubt about it!!

Hehe! Do you think everyone is like pigs, eating and sleeping, waiting to be slaughtered?

It's really hard to say.

Anyway, it's not all according to the police.

I can't help it.!

First of all, the mental state should be considered, a person with mental illness is incapacitated and does not have to bear criminal responsibility;

Secondly, it will definitely be sentenced, that is, the question of whether the sentence will be suspended, and the sentence is difficult to determine.

Excessive defense, sentenced to n years in prison, and got a suspended sentence.

Those who hold this view believe that under the circumstances at that time, Deng Yujiao could protect her rights from infringement by relatively moderate means, and used means that clearly exceeded the necessary limits.

Based on the available materials, I believe that Deng Yujiao's actions fully meet the conditions of legitimate defense and are not excessive.

They came up with this idea, thinking that a dead person would be excessive, and they haven't told everyone the details of what happened so far.

A simple case that has been held for so long shows its law enforcement ability.

The fact that the process of handling the case is not open is convincing.

That is, there is no ability to find out the truth, and no one takes over, which shows the ability of the upper management.

The results of the announcement have been changed again and again, and its attitude of handling things with responsibility can be seen in its political ability.

If you don't have the Internet, you don't know its ability to enforce the law fairly.

Everyone is equal before the law, and I believe that the judgment will be made in accordance with the law.

Say something p, I don't want to believe that I can say the above sentence.

It's not better, everyone has to be our "polluter"! Even if you go in, it's the worst treatment!

The results of her handling are not yet available.

However, both of them were dismissed and dealt with.

Looking at Mr. Zhu's blog, there is a detailed analysis.

The objective aspect of excessive defence is that the act of defence clearly exceeds the limits necessary to stop the wrongful encroachment and causes significant harm. First of all, the defensive behavior of excessive defense clearly exceeds the necessary limit, and the correct understanding of the meaning of the word "obvious" should be specifically considered from the following two aspects:

First, the act of defence goes far beyond what is necessary to stop the unlawful offense, for example, if the defender injures the unlawful thief to stop the unlawful offense, but if the killing of the thief is taken, it goes beyond the purpose and scale of the defence and should fall into the category of "obvious".

Second, the intensity of defence greatly exceeds the intensity of an unlawful offense of an ordinary nature. This should be judged mainly from the comparison of factors such as the intensity of the defensive means used by the defender and the nature of the unlawful infringement. In addition, if an act of defense that is excessively defensive causes a result of major harm, whether the result of the defense constitutes "significant harm" is the main factor in distinguishing whether the act of defense is excessive, and legitimate defense and unlawful aggression are completely opposites, and it is not sufficient to stop the unlawful infringement if it does not cause a certain amount of damage to the unlawful infringer, and if it exceeds the necessary limit and causes serious injury or death, it is a major harm.

Punishment: When dealing with offenders who have acted excessively defensively, the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law shall be correctly applied, and punishment shall be commuted or waived as appropriate in accordance with law. Judging from trial practice, where excessive defense causes serious injury or death, constituting the crime of negligent causing serious injury or negligent causing death, the punishment is to be reduced in accordance with the corresponding sentencing ranges provided for in articles 235 and 233 of the Criminal Code, respectively; Probation may be used if conditions are met; If the circumstances of the crime are minor and do not require a criminal punishment, punishment shall be waived.

Where the crime of intentional injury or intentional homicide is constituted, the punishment shall be commuted in accordance with the corresponding sentencing ranges provided for in articles 234 and 232 of the Criminal Code, respectively; If the conditions for a suspended sentence are met, a suspended sentence may be applied; If the circumstances are minor and do not require a criminal punishment, punishment shall be waived.

Excessive defense refers to acts in which legitimate defense clearly exceeds the necessary limit and causes significant harm to the unlawful offender.

Question: If a classmate hits me first, then I fight back, is this justified defense?

If you seriously injure him, you are overly defensive.

Q: What if I knock him out?

Or break the Adam's apple.

Question: What does that look like?

Do things calmly, and don't hit people casually.

If the question is just a green one.

Ask the question, he hit me first, the premise is.

If you are seriously injured, you will not only be compensated for medical expenses, but will also be subject to criminal liability.

If the other person hits, you can tell your parents and teachers. Don't be impulsive.

"Excessive defense" refers to criminal conduct that clearly exceeds the necessary limit and causes major harm, and shall bear criminal responsibility.

Excessive defence is characterized by two aspects:

1. Objectively manifested as an act of defence that clearly exceeded the necessary limits and caused significant harm;

2. The act of defence must clearly exceed the necessary limit and cause significant harm.

Article 20, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that:

Where legitimate defense clearly exceeds the necessary limit and causes major harm, criminal responsibility shall be borne, but punishment shall be commuted or waived,"

Boldly Diao people, river. Crab. Establish. Hui, what do you want to do?