Is it possible to remove gallstones without removing the gallbladder!

Give you your advice directly, if you really do gallstone removal, it is easy, and it can basically be said that it will be **, this kind of surgery will generally only be done in an acute attack of cholecystitis that the gallbladder cannot be completely removed, in order to relieve the symptoms. In addition, if there has been no seizure, such as right upper quadrant pain, you can temporarily leave it alone, continue to observe, recheck regularly, and if there is pain, it is recommended to do it, because it will usually occur again after the seizure. This should be done if there are not only small stones but also small stones, which can easily pass from the gallbladder into the common bile duct, which may cause obstructive jaundice or biliary pancreatitis.

So it depends on your own situation. (Coding words is time-consuming, please respect the fruits of labor).

Now there is a minimally invasive cholestone removal method, and it is recommended to consult a regular hospital. Good luck soon**!

It is completely possible to carry out gallbladder preservation and stone removal, and oral Chinese medicine to prevent it after stone removal**.

Now there is a policy for stone removal, but there are many complications or sequelae of gallbladder preservation, such as: easy to recur stones, easy to complicate cholecystitis, pancreatitis, etc.

The technique of gallstone removal is quite mature, and Shanghai Hongkang experts use three-mirror combined stone removal to be safe and effective.

It's all checked, I think you should consider **, the current technology is non-invasive, and it shouldn't have any effect.

If your gallbladder function is intact, you can go to the hospital for gallstone-sparing surgery.

Hello dear, I am honored to answer for you: dear, the method of removing gallstones is to open the cyst wall laparoscopically, remove the stone with a cholangoscope, and then combine the double mirror on the suture of the gallbladder incision with a combined cholelithotomy, open the abdominal cavity with a small incision to find the gallbladder, open the bottom of the gallbladder, remove the stone with a cholangioscope, and then sew the small incision of the gallbladder for gallstone removal, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, remove the gallbladder, and also remove the gallbladder, as well as open gallbladder removal, mainly these four methods of removing gallstones. **There are three methods for gallstones, the most common and most effective method is cholecystectomy, which can be performed by open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

There is also cholelithotomy, which is to open the gallbladder to remove the stones, and then sew the gallbladder shut. Patients can also take medications**, mainly taking bile salts such as ursodeoxycholic acid, so that the cholesterol in the bile changes from a saturated state to unsaturated, which helps the stone to dissolve or is not conducive to stone formation.

When there is bile, a large amount of bile is present in the bile to cause stones, and without bile there will be bile in the bile duct to form stones, and stones will be formed in the liver.

I have read many medical records, and many of them cause the formation of stones in the liver after bile resection. Of course, the doctors in the western hospital generally do not tell you this secret, which will greatly affect their income commission.

Finding a good Chinese medicine practitioner and adjusting it according to your physique and dietary habits can be environmentally friendly.

Away from the fake Chinese medicine of integrated Chinese and Western medicine, most of them are Western medicine in their bones. It's the course they take.

If you really want surgery, you also have to do open stone removal, do not do bile removal, the chief surgeon will definitely mobilize you to do bile resection, because the removal of the whole gallbladder is simple and easy to do, it can be done in half an hour, the commission is in hand, and the whole gall is well mobilized to do laparoscopy, the wound is small, the patient is easy to accept, the fee is high, the doctor has a lot of commission, and it is a good match.

It's hard to open a hole and take a stone. Doctors have a lot of time thinking about themselves, how to save time, how to increase income, how to leave work on time. As for the impact on the patient in the future, where to put it, only the doctor himself knows.

That's because most of the gallbladder functions that can grow stones are gone, and if you take the gallbladder, the gallbladder will still grow stones in the future, so it is best to be on the safe side.

After the removal, there will be another stone, is it meaningful to have two surgeries for the same disease?