From a natural science point of view, who is wiser in the rule of Mufasa or Scar?

Updated on science 2024-05-11
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    In the movie, Mufasa has a strong sense of territory, as a leader must have a decisive character, Scar is better at this point, in nature, you have to speak with strength, but Scar is too selfish, this kind of character is not suitable for being a ruler, and when you encounter a big event, you may abandon your companions.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Mufasa is a wiser rule, the lion and spotted hyena are very fierce, and the most important thing to need in the face of attack is to be united, but Scar is a bit selfish and may abandon his companions for his own sake.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Personally, I believe that from the point of view of natural science, the domination of both lions and spotted hyenas has merit. Lions are generally hunted by male lions, which is due to their size, but spotted hyenas are small and social animals. Therefore, both of them can choose the most suitable way of survival according to their different characteristics, and both have merit.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    From a scientific point of view, it is still Scar's rule that is more wise, because there are natural laws in nature, and Mufasa's rule is obviously against this law.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Mufasa's rule will be wiser. Originally, lions and hyenas were very ferocious carnivores, and they were very territorial, but they did not interfere with each other, and Scar's rule was too cruel.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    In the movie, Scar kills his brother Mufasa for ruling the "Glory Country". But under Scar's rule, the "Glory Country" has become a cemetery like the "Elephant Cemetery". And when Mufasa ruled, the grassland was full of life and life.

    Comparing the two scenes, the result is obvious, of course, it is Mufasa.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    From the point of view of natural science, animals are territorial, and their territoriality is very strong. In this respect, both the reign of Mufasa and Scar have merit.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The interspecific rivalry between lions and spotted hyenas depends first on their relative numbers and secondly on the attitude of male lions.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Mufasa's resolute efforts to keep hyenas out of its territory are doomed to futility in nature. In contrast, Scar's approach to living peacefully with hyenas is much more pragmatic, and from a natural science point of view, hyenas do not affect the natural ecology.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Although lions and hyenas are both very territorial animals, each pack of lions and hyenas has its own territory.

    Mufasa and Scar are like lions and hyenas.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Although Scar usurped the throne for the time being, it also lured the wolf into the house.

Related questions
9 answers2024-05-11

After the apple is picked, it can be said that it gradually ripens and then gradually rots. >>>More

6 answers2024-05-11

Dialectics of Nature: A Reflection of the Marxist View of Nature and the View of Natural Science.

10 answers2024-05-11

Matter in philosophy is actually very general, (in fact, I think it is a name, similar to Lao Tzu's "Dao", just a saying) and natural science matter is what is seen and seen, or it can be said that it is a material form. The difference is that there is an inclusive relationship between the two, which is actually a kind of connection. (A connection is a collection of relationships, causality, containment, and dependence.) >>>More

6 answers2024-05-11

Scientific experiment is a kind of practical activity with the primary purpose of understanding nature, and as a research method for understanding nature, it is superior to general observation and production practice in many aspects. With the fierce struggle between natural science, religious theology, and scholasticism, a group of philosophers and scientific fighters vigorously advocated scientific experiments, and regarded scientific experiments as a powerful way for science to defeat opponents and strengthen their own strength. As scientific experiments have increasingly become independent social practices, modern natural knowledge has not only a unique practical basis. >>>More

10 answers2024-05-11

There is no so-called natural science in China? sky88088

Brother is right, "Since ancient times, Chinese have the idea of the unity of heaven and man, and like to see everything as interconnected. "But all this is the result of objectifying objects, because everything is indeed connected, for example, in a cool place you will feel cold, in the sun you will feel hot, if you face a mountain every day you will feel depressed, and every day you will see the starry sky over time your character will become cheerful, the wisdom of the ancients is very strong, they found that everything runs according to certain rules, and cannot be treated as a single object, for example, if you have someone around you, very strong like a mountain, you will feel depressedIf there is a person around you who is as tolerant as the starry sky, you will become very cheerful and so on, and then the ancients began to summarize their similarities, to put it bluntly, it is the operation of this world, and then called the gossip, and then completely invented the theory of yin and yang and the five elements. The common usage is to apply it to everything for deduction, which is similar to seeing that there is a mountain at your doorstep or that there are people who are much stronger than you next to you, and then deduce that your personality may be somewhat depressed, rather than saying that you are a bit depressed after a long time of careful questioning like a Western psychiatrist. >>>More