-
In terms of floating-point computing power, Intel's processors generally only have two floating-point execution units, while AMD's processors are generally designed with three parallel floating-point execution units, so among processors of the same grade, the floating-point computing power of AMD processors is better than that of Intel's processors. It has strong floating-point arithmetic capabilities, which is advantageous for game applications and 3D processing applications. In addition, in terms of multiple ** instructions, Intel has developed the SSE instruction set, which has now developed to SSE3, and AMD has also developed a corresponding, SSE-compatible enhanced 3D NOW!
Instruction set. In contrast, Intel's processor is slightly better than AMD's in terms of multi-instruction, and there are many software optimized for SSE, so in multi-** software and plane processing software, compared with AMD processors of the same grade, Intel's CPU appears to have more advantages. In addition, what kind of CPU to choose,** is a more critical factor, in terms of performance, the same grade of Intel processor as a whole may have a little advantage over AMD's processor, but in terms of **, AMD's processor is absolutely superior.
For example: Intel's P4 ** is about 1200, and AMD's Barton 2500+, which has similar performance, is only priced at about 600.
In the end, do you choose AMD or Inte's CPU?From the above, it can be understood that AMD's CPU has advantages over Intel's processors of the same grade in three-dimensional production, game applications, and processing, while Intel's CPU has advantages in commercial applications, multi-applications, and graphic design. In addition to the use, it is also necessary to consider the cost performance.
In this way, you can choose the most suitable CPU according to your actual use and capital budget.
-
It should be said that AMD's cost performance is relatively high.
But now this advantage is becoming less and less apparent.
Because AMD is no longer cost-effective.
Some of his products are already comparable to inter.
-
Cite. Huh!N years ago, it was definitely Intel Now the difference is basically not very big, although AMD has more heat, but there is a certain advantage in speed.
By: paradise2009 - Child Life Level 1 6-4 18:28
When did you see AMD's high calorific value, Inlel is a boiler!
-
There is no way to compare this, after all, both have a large number of followers, in terms of office, Intel is stronger, and in terms of games, AMD is slightly better.
-
In general, don't choose AMD.
The main thing is that the stability is too poor! ~
I really don't dare to compliment.
Although slightly better in the game.
Strengths. The advantages of Intel processors are that they are technologically advanced, high-tech, more in line with the concept of the future, stable in work, fast, cooler and environmentally friendly, more power-efficient, and quieter fans. >>>More
According to the pin type of the CPU, you can directly match the pin type of the motherboard by querying the pin type of the motherboard
The so-called AMD 3000+ means that AMD believes that this processor is equivalent to the Inter processor but in the dual-core era, it is not such a meaning, but simply indicates the level of the product. For example, 5200+ is definitely not the equivalent of a processor. There is practically no processor with such a high frequency. >>>More
AMD has now left an impression in the IT circle and in the hearts of IT people, with high performance and high speed. >>>More
The so-called platform refers to the "motherboard chipset", and the chipset is basically the north-south bridge chip of the motherboard. >>>More