What are the disadvantages of the abolition of examinations in primary education? What measures shou

At present, some primary schools have abolished the 100-point system for examinations and adopted a grading system, for example, to evaluate students' academic level according to grades A, B and C. Such an evaluation system is more humane.

Or take 100 points for each subject and score more than 80 points for excellent, 60 points - 80 points for passing, and less than 60 points for failing. Those with a score of 60 or more will be counted as 5 credits, and those with a score of 80 or more will be awarded for excellence. If the score is less than 60, continue to strengthen the study of this course until the course reaches 60 points.

If you pass all the courses from the first grade to the sixth grade in elementary school, you will enter the seventh grade of junior high school. In fact, this is a more ideal student evaluation system.

Instead of abolishing examinations in primary education, the score evaluation system has been abolished and replaced by a hierarchical assessment system.

The basic knowledge of primary education must be firmly grasped, and the hierarchical system now adopted only protects the self-esteem of students, and teachers and parents must also refer to the level of learning of students, so that the quality of our entire nation can be improved.

Practicing egalitarianism, China's education system is not conducive to the development of deep development potential, and does not pay attention to the development of imagination and creativity. In addition, China's education market needs are closely aligned. The West is the opposite.

Without exams, students don't have to talk about basic knowledge.

Enhance the sense of achievement, honor and pride in learning.

1.The principle of educational equity has been clarified and educational equity has been improved.

2.It reduces the testing pressure of students and reduces the learning burden.

3.It increases the fairness of competition among students and avoids the problem of competition for students.

4.It effectively prevents the waste of educational resources and improves the efficiency of the use of educational resources.

However, there are some possible negative effects:

1.There are fewer opportunities for students to choose from, and they are not able to choose schools and study directions according to their learning abilities and strengths.

2.The selection of students is limited in the way in which the abilities and qualities of students cannot be fully examined.

3.The concentration of students in some high-quality schools has led to a small number of students in some ordinary schools, which has affected the teaching quality and the allocation of educational resources in these schools.

To sum up, primary and secondary schools are not allowed to select students through examinations or disguised examinations, which has both advantages and disadvantages. The Ministry of Education should formulate corresponding policies and measures according to the actual situation to minimize the negative impact and protect the interests of students and schools.

If primary and secondary school admissions are not allowed to select students through examinations or disguised examinations, the following will be affected:

1.Increased difficulty in admissions: Without exams or disguised exams, it will be difficult for schools to accurately assess students' academic performance and potential when recruiting students, thus increasing the difficulty of admissions.

2.Declining teaching quality: Entrance exams are an important way to measure students' academic ability, and if they are canceled, schools will have difficulty selecting the right students, which may lead to a decline in teaching quality.

3.Reduced academic competition: Selecting students through exams can stimulate students' motivation to learn and promote academic competition, and if exams are canceled, students may lack the motivation to shout academic competition.

4.Increased parental anxiety: Without exams or disguised exams, schools and parents will have difficulty judging whether a student is a good fit for that school or class, and parental anxiety may increase.

In short, the abolition of primary and secondary entrance exams or disguised exams may lead schools to select unsuitable students, reduce the quality of teaching, reduce academic competition, increase parental anxiety, and may also waste resources. Therefore, appropriate assessment methods should be adopted to select suitable students on the premise of respecting students' individuality and development.

Elementary school admissions are not allowed to select students through examinations or disguised examinations, which will have the following impacts:

1.Challenges faced by schools: It is difficult for schools to determine students' ability levels and adaptability without test scores, which can make it difficult for schools to enroll.

2.Parents' anxiety: Many parents may feel uneasy and anxious as they can no longer rely on their child's test scores to decide whether or not they will get into the school of their choice.

In order to overcome the above problems, it is recommended to take the following measures while canceling the examination selection:

1.Introduce a variety of assessment methods: Schools can introduce a variety of assessment methods, such as interviews, work presentations, sports tests, etc., to fully understand students' abilities and potential.

2.Strengthen extracurricular activities: Schools can understand students' interests, hobbies, strengths and actual performance by organizing extracurricular activities and practices, so as to better select suitable students. This calendar.

3.Strengthen home-school communication: Schools should strengthen communication with parents to better understand the school's admission policies and evaluation methods to reduce their anxiety.

To sum up, the pros and cons of abolishing the entrance exam for elementary school admissions are as follows:

Pros: Reduce the pressure on students to enroll and improve the equity and inclusion of education.

Cons: Increased challenges in schools and increased anxiety among parents.

Recommendations: Introduce a variety of assessment methods, strengthen extracurricular activities, strengthen home-school communication, and improve the quality of education.

If primary and secondary school enrollment is not allowed to select students through examinations or disguised examinations, the following effects will be brought about:

1.Promote fair competition. By abolishing the examination or disguised examination, the school will no longer only use the test score as the only criterion for selecting students, but will give more consideration to the comprehensive quality and personal ability of students.

2.Return to the basic meaning of education. The abolition of exams or disguised exams will also help to return to the essence of education, which is to preach, teach, and solve doubts, so that students can develop freely in a relaxed and healthy situation.

This helps students to establish a correct outlook on learning and values, and gradually develop good self-management and self-directed learning skills.

3.Reduce the burden of enrollment and enrollment. The cancellation of exams or disguised exams can also make the process of enrollment simpler and reduce the pressure and burden caused by admission.

In this way, primary and secondary education can be shifted to more important and meaningful directions, such as healthy development, innovation, and thinking ability, so as to create better educational conditions for cultivating high-quality personnel of high quality.

4.Improving the social status of education. The abolition of examinations or disguised examinations will bring education back to its rightful place and raise the social status of education.

Instead of taking the test results as the only criterion for judging students, each student will have the opportunity to show their versatility and strengths, and better reflect the student's personal ability and personality.

Although there will be some negative consequences of the abolition of exams or disguised exams, overall, the advantages clearly outweigh the disadvantages, helping to promote equity and innovation in education.

Primary and secondary schools are not allowed to enroll students through examinations or disguised examinations, and this policy, if implemented, may have the following impacts:

Positive Impact:1Curbing the excessive concentration of educational resources in top-level schools is conducive to the equitable distribution of educational resources. This can reduce disparities between institutions and equalize educational opportunities.

2.Reduce the pressure on parents and students to choose a school and go on to higher education. By no longer competing for exams to achieve higher education, you can avoid the test-taking education and the pressure of students going on to higher education too early.

3.It is conducive to promoting quality education. Schools no longer pass the results of the pure section test and are judged by the pants, and can pay more attention to the all-round development and quality cultivation of students.

Negative effects:1It can reduce the quality of education. Some schools relax admission standards in pursuit of quantity, which affects the quality and order of teaching.

2.It is difficult to achieve true equality of opportunity. Parents will still try to get their children into better schools through other means, such as moving to choose a school district, relationships and other informal routes. It's still not fair.

3.It may increase the burden on primary and secondary schools. Some parents will use various means to get their children into better schools, which may bring pressure to the operation of the school and affect the normal teaching order.

4.In some areas, it may be difficult to get into school. In areas where educational resources are scarce, some students may find it difficult to find appropriate access to school, and it may be difficult for them to enter school.

5.It is also facing the problem of difficulty in policy adjustment. The implementation of this policy requires the coordination of the interests of all parties, but in reality, the relationship between all parties is complicated, the policy adjustment is relatively difficult, and the implementation is also facing challenges.

In summary, the implementation of this policy takes into account the positive significance of educational equity and stress reduction, but there are also many negative impacts and challenges that cannot be avoided. The implementation of the policy needs to consider various influencing factors and promote it on the basis of coordinating the relationship between all parties to achieve the established educational goals and significance. It is difficult for a single policy change to solve complex educational problems, which requires a joint force at all levels to ultimately change unreasonable educational concepts and behaviors.