English A few fill in the blank questions need to be asked

Updated on educate 2024-06-07
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    did he arrive?--he arrived at yesterday.

    read his books when i was at enjoy them very much.

    1. From the answer, we can see that it was 2:00 p.m. yesterday, so it can be judged that the questioner is asking when he arrived and happened in the past, so the tense is the ordinary past tense.

    2. From when i was at school, it can be judged that when I went to school after the feast, so the main sentence uses the simple past tense. Both the past tense and the past participle of read are archetypes, but the pronunciation is different. "I love these books so much.

    The potato auspicious infiltration is speaking of the general situation, so the number ridge is used in the general present tense.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    ① the moment the 29th olympic games were declared open,the whole world cheered.

    That's right. The moment the 29th olympic games were declared open is a temporal adverbial clause equivalent to when the 29th olympic games were declared open.

    russ and earl were auto mechanics earning the same pay,but earl had more embition.

    That's true. earning the same pay is a postpositional modifier for the present participle phrase. But there is a sentence before russ and earl were auto mechanics.

    So there are clauses before and after but!

    Good luck!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The first half of the first sentence is a definite clause, the antecedent is the moment, and that is omitted at the end, and of course the predicate verb should be used in the clause.

    The second sentence has the predicate verb were, earning is the subject complement in the sentence, and the logical subject is the subject of this sentence, which is the active relation, and there is no special requirement for the time relationship, so the present participle form is used.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    1. Passive voice, baby. Phrases and sentences are not distinguished by commas, but by sentence structure. The subject is the object of the open action, not the executor.

    2, earning is the present participle as an adjective used as a definite for mechanics, earning is not a predicate form of a verb.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The fact that there is no conjunction and no comma does not mean that the clause cannot be supported. Hehe.. This kind of stuff just messes up.

    I'm all professional now, and I still can't explain these structural issues. But just remember, the moment leading clauses, such as the moment i got there, they had left. You can understand that at the moment omits at

    It's enough to read a few more sentences like this, and no one will be able to explain it.

    2.The landlord ignored that there was a still one in front of you. Hehe.. This is a matter of carelessness.

    If you don't understand, then ask. Feel free to answer.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The whole world in the first question....The following is the sentence stem, which means that the comma can no longer be preceded by a sentence (unless there is a conjunction). But is this question really a sentence before the comma? No, but a noun moment.

    The 29th Olympic Games is used to embellish The Moment. You have to learn to analyze sentence structure, not just look at the surface, which shows that English still needs to think, not just rote memorization as people think. The second question earning can be changed to who earned.

    earn has changed from non-predicate to predicate! This shows that non-predicate verbs can be transformed into clauses. When the non-predicate is an adverbial, it can be converted into an adverbial clause, and when it is a definite sentence, it can be converted into a definite clause.

    A non-meaning: when you don't understand why it's in that form, you can try to transform it into a corresponding clause and look at the problem from a different angle.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It's not that mom doesn't want to, it's mom who doesn't allow, it's called mom who doesn't allow, and item A doesn't about the second empty't, which is a negation of the verb allow, indicating that mom won't let me buy it.

    The question about would is will in the past tense, but it means will and the question is why didn't you buy the calculator? ,didn'The word t means in the past tense, and people ask why don't you buy a computer?

    I had wanted to here, I thought ah, had done means what I wanted, but I didn't do, in the past perfect tense, so your would watch is going to be in this situation, I can't say it at all.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    When you say would not indicate your willingness, it means that you didn't want to do anything, but you did it, that is, your mother didn't allow it, but she still allowed it.

Related questions
5 answers2024-06-07

b.The meaning of the whole sentence is: we could have walked to the station, it was so close. Yes, there was no need to fight in the first place. Both sentences denote the subjunctive voice with complaint and regret. >>>More

7 answers2024-06-07

1.Choose A. The following "will" indicates that this is the next step. Therefore the preceding thing must be done. >>>More

8 answers2024-06-07

The phrase be careful with һ .

It is logical that people spend more than they save, that is, spend early with credit cards. >>>More

22 answers2024-06-07

In English, tense denotes tense, which reflects the action and behavior of the time when the mind occurs, and is divided into present tense and past tense; The aspect represents the tense body, which reflects that the verb occurrence is a state process, which is divided into a continuous body and a complete body; The combination of tenses and tenses produces 16 basic tense sentence patterns; Chinese called tense is a popular non-professional name, and when you are majoring in English, you will not call it tense, because English verbs have two latitudes: time of occurrence and state, immediate tense and tense.