The husband deliberately killed his wife, and the man needs to lose money, right?

This is not a question of losing money, but of going to prison and killing people, and if you deliberately kill someone, you must compensate for all kinds of losses in addition to killing someone.

You need to lose money, not only do you need to lose money, but you also have to go to jail, and you have to bear legal responsibility, okay?

Then you will definitely lose money, after all, it is a matter of human life, how can you not lose money.

I think I need to pay compensation for intentionally hurting my wife, but I think in the end, this husband may also be sentenced to death.

Although it is his wife, he also needs to be responsible for killing, not only to lose money, but also to pay legal responsibility, if it is intentional homicide, then what awaits him is the lightest and indefinite, impulsive, regret for life.

The husband deliberately killed his wife, which is a vicious criminal offense, and of course he has to pay money, and he has to pay alimony to the other party's parents.

The husband deliberately killed his wife, and the man needs to lose money, no, then he must lose money. And the death penalty should be imposed.

The husband deliberately killed his wife, and losing money is a trivial matter, but violating the criminal law is a major matter, and this is a matter of being shot to death, committing the crime of intentional homicide.

The husband deliberately killed his wife, and he had to pay money. And it will be subject to the legal materials it deserves.

The husband deliberately killed his wife, does the man need to pay money, I think the husband deliberately killed his wife, then he must go to jail, and he must also lose money.

This is intentional, it depends on how the court decides, but this must be compensated and sentenced.

If you kill your wife, you will not only have to be criminally responsible, but also have to pay compensation.

Husband, the man who deliberately hurt his wife has to accompany him with his life, unless it is a private conversation about killing people and living a long life, even if he is private, he will go to prison for a long time.

Not only will you lose money, but you will also be sentenced.

This situation should involve criminal law, he should be sentenced, and he also needs to pay money.

This is not to accompany the money, this is intentional homicide, and criminal responsibility is to be borne.

Whether you need to lose money depends on how the law handles it, and if you need to pay it, you will pay it.

The husband intentionally kills his wife, which is the crime of intentional homicide and bears criminal responsibility.

Is intentional homicide something that can only be solved by losing money? That's life-threatening.

When a husband kills someone, the wife is generally not obliged to pay financial compensation on her husband's behalf. The civil compensation borne for the criminal act is a personal debt, and the liability for compensation is borne by the criminal's personal property, and the wife will not be implicated.

Legal analysis

If a husband kills someone, the wife does not have to share the compensation. Fines refer to the method of punishment in which the court sentences the offender to pay a certain amount of money to the state. It is a type of property punishment and is a supplementary punishment.

Fines are imposed on the personal debts of the offender, and if the husband commits the crime, is the joint property of the husband and wife.

The wife will not be directly required to bear the part of the property owned by him. The husband's civil liability for compensation should be borne by him. In other words, it should be compensated by his property.

If the husband does not have any property, the others are not obliged to pay compensation. If the husband does not have property, consideration may be given to the existence of other marital property. If there is no property, the wife is not obliged to pay compensation.

Property belonging to the man in the community of the husband may be used for repayment. If the husband commits a crime, the wife is not obliged to compensate for the tortious debt, which is not a joint debt of the husband and wife.

The wife is not jointly and severally liable. If the murderer is executed.

After leaving an estate, then it should be inherited by the heirs in the estate.

to the extent of liability. If there is no estate, then liability is extinguished with the death of the debtor.

Legal basis

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

Article 1064:Debts incurred by both husband and wife as jointly signed by both husband and wife or by one of the husband and wife as an expression of common intent such as retrospective recognition by one of the husband and wife, as well as debts incurred by one of the husband and wife in their own name for the daily needs of the family during the existence of the marital relationship, are joint debts of the husband and wife. Debts incurred by one of the spouses in his or her own name during the existence of the marital relationship in excess of the daily needs of the family are not joint debts of the husband and wife; However, the creditor can prove that the debt was used for the husband and wife's common life, joint production and business, or based on the common intention of the husband and wife.

Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China.

Article 36: Where victims suffer economic losses as a result of criminal conduct, the criminals are to be given criminal punishments in addition to law.

and shall be sentenced to compensation for economic losses depending on the circumstances. Where criminals who bear civil liability for compensation are concurrently sentenced to a fine, and their assets are insufficient to pay in full, or where they are sentenced to confiscate their assets, they shall first bear civil liability for compensation to the victims.

If a husband kills someone, is the wife obligated to pay financial compensation? It is the husband's fault that the husband kills, but the wife is not obliged to pay financial compensation, which can be used if it is the joint property of the husband and wife.

Shang Fu killed someone, in fact, he is obliged to bear financial compensation, because his wife is obliged to compensate, because the money in the family is shared by the husband and wife. So the half belongs to the husband, so he is obliged to pay compensation.

The husband kills, the wife is. Those who are obliged to bear the financial compensation are still a family after all, so it is also a matter of duty.

If a husband kills someone, is the wife obligated to pay financial compensation? There must be an obligation to pay financial compensation, since part of the joint property of the husband and wife is used to bear financial compensation.

If the husband kills someone, if the other party files a civil lawsuit, the wife is obliged to pay financial compensation, and the joint property of the husband and wife will be enforced by the court.

It is necessary to use the husband's part of the property to make compensation, that is, the wife only occupies a part of the joint property of the husband and wife, and the husband has a part, and the part of the husband should be used for compensation.

No obligation, this law has provisions! You can take a closer look at the 2021 Civil Code!

If the criminal liability attached to the case is caused by one of the spouses, then the other spouse should be compensated in their joint property. However, if the marital property is relatively small, then the compensation is also limited, not unlimited.

This is an obligation to bear the liability for compensation, because you and your husband are husband and wife, so you have this obligation.

Hello, as long as there is no complete divorce, you have a certain obligation, and you must tell your husband to reform and change his ways.

If your husband kills someone. As wives, you are. The relationship between husband and wife also has this responsibility.

If your husband kills someone, I think you should divorce your husband as soon as possible to protect your economic rights, that is, try not to compensate, and it would be better if you could not compensate.

Legal analysis: After the husband kills his wife, the woman's family can file a civil lawsuit attached to the criminal case, requesting the murderer to bear civil liability for compensation.

Legal basis: Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Issues Concerning the Scope of Civil Litigation Attached to Criminal Cases

Where the victim has suffered mental harm as a result of the criminal conduct and the attached civil lawsuit is raised, the people's court will not accept it.

Article 2: Material losses suffered by victims as a result of criminal conduct refers to actual losses that victims have already suffered as a result of criminal conduct and losses that they will inevitably suffer.

Article 3: Where, after a judgment is made in accordance with law, a people's court hearing an attached civil litigation case ascertains that the defendant truly has no property available for enforcement, it shall rule to suspend or terminate enforcement.

If the death is caused by negligence, the death penalty will not be imposed; If it is intentional homicide, the death penalty is generally imposed, and if there is a child staring at the dust, the court will most likely not sentence the death penalty because the court will consider the child's future life. The specific needs depend on the facts of the case. In the course of the trial of the case, it is important for the husband to actively compensate his wife's family, and the sentencing of the husband can play a decisive role to a certain extent.

Legal basisArticle 232 of the Criminal Law.

Intentional homicide] Whoever kills exclusively and intentionally shall be sentenced to death, life imprisonment, or fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years; where the circumstances are more minor, the sentence is between three and ten years imprisonment.

Generally, there is no obligation and no financial compensation.

Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 19: Agreements on marital property.

Husband and wife may agree that property acquired during the marriage and property acquired before marriage shall be separately or jointly owned or partly separately and partly jointly owned. The agreement shall be in writing. Where there is no agreement or the agreement is unclear, the provisions of articles 17 and 18 of this Law apply.

The agreement between the husband and wife on the property acquired during the marriage and the property before the marriage is binding on both parties. If the husband and wife agree that the property acquired during the existence of the marital relationship shall belong to each other, and the debts owed by the husband or wife to the outside world are known to the third party, the debts shall be paid off with the property owned by the husband or the wife.

Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China (II).

Article 24.

Where a creditor claims rights in respect of a debt incurred by one of the spouses in his or her own name during the existence of the marital relationship, it shall be treated as a joint debt of the husband and wife. However, one of the husband and wife can prove that the creditor and the debtor have expressly agreed that it is a personal debt, or can prove that it falls under the circumstances provided for in paragraph 3 of article 19 of the Marriage Law.

The wife is not obliged, but as a joint property of the husband and wife, it should be compensated by its general.

There is no obligation to pay financial compensation for the husband's homicide, but the victim may apply for a freezing of the property of the husband for part of the joint property of the husband and wife.

In the case of a husband who kills a crime, the financial compensation is limited to the part of the marital property belonging to the husband, and the wife is not obliged to bear it. However, it can be voluntarily undertaken.

During the marriage, there is such an obligation and it should be assumed!