Is science good or bad? I want to be square .

Promote social and human development.

Environmental pollution, environmental pollution is due to the fact that science has not yet developed completely, as long as science develops to a certain extent, environmental pollution will be controlled. And the current environmental pollution is caused by the inferior character of some people, who will do whatever it takes to make money, and this has nothing to do with science! In the past, environmental pollution was to achieve rapid development, so that human beings could become the spirit of all things now, and now science is to develop and protect the environment at the same time!

Accelerating the extinction of species is also a problem for human beings, as for the tools used to hunt animals, they were born because human beings wanted to defend themselves, and ancient people did not want to be eaten by leopards......Wars, there were wars in ancient times, and now a war is quite a lot of thousands of deaths, much more than in ancient times, but there were only a few people in ancient times, how many people can there be in a tribe? Now there are 6 billion people on the earth.1 According to the percentage, it may be that the percentage of people who died in ancient times is even more! Diseases, it is true that there are more and more diseases, but without science, will all human beings get sick and die?

Science is still very important!

Think it's good when you need it, and you think it's bad when you don't. Or. When you are in a different place, do you feel the benefits of technology when you think of your distant relatives? Fear of harming the plate.

This data is ** on the map, and the final result is subject to the latest data on the map.

Interesting, I would also like to express my opinion, I think the first thing to distinguish between science and technology, I think science is both true, good and beautiful, because science is science, it is the law of nature, it is innocent and lovely, but technology has its main application scope, it is not necessarily. For example, nuclear fission is science, and the manufacture of atomic bombs and the construction of nuclear power plants are both technologies, and science itself is true, good, and beautiful, but the technology it produces is both good and evil. It depends on what kind of people have mastered the science and what kind of technology they have created.

If the good side masters science, it can bring benefits to mankind, and if the bad side masters science, it will bring disadvantages to human beings, so the question of the pros and cons of science and technology has become a question of good and evil for human beings.

If there is no scientific development, then the opposition simply cannot hold a microphone and oppose it!

Of course, it's Lida, where did you find your information?? It's on the computer! That's all about science!

Because we are human, it is in our nature to be curious about nature exploration.

Besides, although science has caused damage to the environment, if science is not developed, even if it is destroying the environment, we don't know at all.